中国新型大型巡洋舰与美国海军的火力相当 [美国媒体]

China’s Giant New Cruiser Matches America’s Naval Firepower
The Type 055 boasts 122 missile cells

中国新型大型巡洋舰与美国海军的火力相当
——055型拥有多达122个导弹发射单元



China’s Giant New Cruiser Matches America’s Naval Firepower

中国新型大型巡洋舰与美国海军的火力相当。

Chinese state television has broadcast the first clear, overhead view of the Chinese navy’s first Type 055 cruiser. The image confirms what foreign analysts have expected since the new cruiser began taking shape in 2014.

中国国家电视台首次播放了中国海军第一艘055型巡洋舰清晰的俯视画面。自2014年该新型巡洋舰开始成型以来，首次证实了外国分析人士的预期。

The Type 055 carries no fewer than 122 missiles in vertical cells — any mix of anti-air, anti-ship and land-attack models. That matches the weapons-loadout of the U.S. Navy’s Ticonderoga-class cruisers … and exceeds the armament of every other surface warship in the Pacific region.

055型至少携带122个垂直发射单元——可搭配防空、反舰、对地导弹型号，其战斗力与美国提康德罗加级导弹巡洋舰相当……且超过太平洋地区其它任何水面舰艇。

The new cruiser could enter service as early as 2018.

该新型巡洋舰最早可于2018年服役。

The Type 055 — which is an estimate 590 feet long and displaces at least 10,000 tons — represents a new class of warship for the Chinese navy. When Beijing launched its naval rearmament program in the 1990s, it focused on building large numbers of small- and medium-size corvettes, frigates and destroyers.

055型据估计590英尺长(约180m)，排水量至少为10000吨，代表了中国海军新一级战舰。北京在90年代启动海军军备改良项目时，聚焦于建造大量中小型轻巡洋舰、护卫舰和驱逐舰。

These surface vessels patrol the Chinese coast, sail independently or in small groups to deter pirates in the Indian Ocean or act as escorts for China’s new amphibious assault ships and the country’s — so far — sole aircraft carrier, the refurbished, ex-Russian Liaoning.

这些水面舰艇巡视中国海岸，独立或成小型编队在印度洋航行以威慑海盗，或充当护卫舰，以保护中国新型两栖攻击舰以及中国迄今为止唯一的航空母舰——翻新前俄罗斯的辽宁舰。

Prior to the Type 055, the biggest surface combatant in the Chinese fleet was the 7,500-ton-displacement Type o52D destroyer, six of which were in service and several others fitting out as of October 2017. A Type 052D carries 64 missiles in vertical cells.

在055型之前，中国海军最大的水面战舰是7500吨级的052D型驱逐舰，其中6艘在役，另外几艘将在2017年10月装备。052D型携带64个垂直发射单元。

For comparison, the U.S. Navy’s 9,600-ton Arleigh Burke-class destroyers boast as many as 96 missile cells. Japan’s Atago-class destroyers, displacing 10,000 tons, also feature 96 cells. The 11,500-ton Russian cruiser Varyag, the biggest vessel in Moscow’s Pacific fleet, carries 120 missiles.

与之相比，美国海军9600吨级的阿利·伯克级驱逐舰拥有多达96个导弹发射单元。日本的爱宕级驱逐舰(日本版的阿利伯克级)，排水量为10000吨，也拥有96个发射单元。11,500吨级的俄罗斯瓦良格号巡洋舰是俄罗斯太平洋舰队最大战舰，可携带120枚导弹。

With the Type 055, China has caught up to, or surpassed, the other Pacific powers in terms of sheer seagoing firepower. Per ship. But the Chinese fleet still lags behind the United States and barely exceeds Japan in the overall number of seagoing vertical missile cells, a useful shorthand for naval power.

拥有055型后，中国在单舰火力方面已经赶上或超过了其它太平洋大国——注意是单一战舰，但中国舰队的垂直发射单元总量仍落后于美国，勉强超过日本——这是海军实力的一个简单写照。

China’s 39 modern destroyers and frigates — not counting the Type 055 — together can deploy around 1,500 cells. The U.S. Pacific Fleet’s 36 Burkes and 12 Ticonderogas together possess nearly 5,000 missile cells. Japan’s 19 modern destroyers carry around 1,000 cells, combined.

不包括055型，中国的39艘现代驱逐舰和护卫舰可部署大约1500个单元。美国太平洋舰队的36艘伯克级及12艘提康德罗加级总共拥有近5000个导弹单元。日本的19艘现代驱逐舰携带大约1000个单元。


Sander6 days ago
Photo is NOT 055 cruiser! It is an older 052 destroyer CNS Harbin(112)commissioned in 1994. The photo was taken when it made port call to San Diego years ago!

照片不是055型！而是1994年服役的老式052型哈尔滨号(舷号112)。这张照片是它数年前停靠圣地亚哥时照的！

DE5 days ago
As a Chinese people I want to say that,a lot of photos of China on Yahoo looks weird, maybe Yahoo likes to uglify China.It doesn't make any sense.

作为一个中国人，我想说，雅虎上许多中国的照片都很怪，可能雅虎想要丑化中国吧。毫无道理。

B525 days ago
Stoopid fake news Yahoo, cannot even get the photo right.......find an old picture with some Chinese standing on board.....yawn!

愚蠢的雅虎假新闻，连照片都找不对……随便找了张中国人站在甲板上的照片……打哈欠！

colette6 days ago
I thought it was odd as it was flying the US flag....ugh!

哦，难怪，我就觉得上面飘着美国国旗很奇怪。

Joe6 days ago
But the Chinese ships still have to call India for their tech support.

但是中国战舰仍然不得不打电话给印度人请求技术支持。

Mark5 days ago
Is that what your Indian partner told you in your dream ?

这就是你的印度伙伴在梦里告诉你的？

Cobra5 days ago
"My gun doesn't work. "
- "Your son is a jerk?"

“我的枪出问题了。”
“你儿子是个白痴？”
(枪——鸡儿，意思是老爹出毛病生下了白痴儿子)
(PS：经网友指出，这个应该是印度从俄罗斯买AK47，结果被转手买到了中国的56式的梗，后来印度人把枪用坏了，打电话给我们要求售后服务。
两句话发音有些相似，是在讽刺印度人的英语口音，确实是高端黑啊！)

WHOCARES6 days ago
China only calls India when the sailors want curry beef.

中国只有在海员们想吃咖喱牛肉时，才会打电话给印度。

Stupid Flanders6 days ago
Oh lookee - it's "The National Interest" again...and again...they try to start fights that are in NOBODY'S INTEREST...national or otherwise.

哦看呀呀——叒是《国家利益》(美国杂志)，他们试图到处煽风点火。

But aside from the war mongering and the fear mongering, this article is basically a giant request for more funding. You know...because outspending the next 10 countries combined isn't enough for them...and having ANY services to our own citizens...or any improvement to our infrastructure, or education for our kids...is somehow too much for us to ask of our own taxes.

但且不提战争贩子和恐惧贩子，这篇文章基本上是在狮子大开口——要求更多的资金。你懂的……因为国防支出超过10个国家的总和还不够……而为我们的公民提供任何服务……或者改善我们的基础设施，或者教育我们孩子……似乎都是纳税人很过分的要求。

Stupid Flanders6 days ago
For the people complaining that we spend too much on healthcare...yeah...because the AMA is a powerful lobbying organization and our healthcare costs are not regulated like OTHER countries do. We spend more for our healthcare and get the least out of it...because of lobbyists. Just like we spend so much on "defense" (I think it's not "defense" when you blow giant chunks of it invading people and putting our guns to everyone else's heads). That nonsense about spending "only" 650 billion...does not include our ongoing weapons giveaways to terrorists, and whatever else we blow on invading the middle east and trying to play both sides of the fence.

有些人抱怨我们在医疗保健上花了太多钱……是啊……因为美国医学协会是一个强大的游说组织，我们的医疗费用不像其它国家那样受监管。我们花更多的钱购买医疗保健，但获益却是最少的……都是因为游说集团。就像我们在“防御”上花了太多钱一样(我认为，当我们对别人狂轰乱炸、当我们用枪指着其他所有人的脑袋时，这不能称作“防御”)。而这些狗屁“才”花了6500亿美元……这还不包括我们不断向恐怖分子提供的武器、我们入侵中东的花费，以及试图当两面派浪费的钱。

And BTW - I was concerned about ALL these things since the year 2000...because that's when our government stopped even pretending to care about those things.

顺便说一下，自从2000年以来，我就一直担心这些事情……因为自那时起，我们的政府甚至都不愿意伪装了。

Gunslinger6 days ago
I like big boats and cool guns as much as the next guy but using our Navy as a force projection around the world has made other countries realize that they need to keep up. It was an arms race and socialism that killed the Soviet Union, look where our country is heading. We are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past, heck we even fought a decade long war in Afghanistan. Our leaders and more importantly our people need to open a history book.

我像其他人一样喜欢大船和很酷的枪，但在全世界到处投射我们的海军力量让其它国家感到他们必须跟上，正是军备竞赛和社会主义杀死了苏联——再看看我们国家现在的方向吧！我们注定要重蹈(苏联)覆辙——我们甚至在阿富汗打了数十年战争。我们的领导人——更重要的是——我们的人民需要翻开一本历史书。

Damned If I Know6 days ago
Translation - Military contractor need more money. Your schools, roads, bridges, and anything else you pay for...that you'll have to do without.

我来翻译一下文章——军火商需要更多的钱。忘掉你的学校，道路，桥梁吧……你纳的税应该用来买军火。

Volax Porter6 days ago
China is so much like Japan circa 1930 it's scary

中国太像1930年代的日本了，太可怕了。

Yahoo6 days ago
sneaky attack obsessed Japan is not a worthy comparison.

痴迷于偷袭的日本不配作比较。

Bill6 days ago
US is so much like 1930's Germany its scary !!!

美国太像1930年代的德国了，太可怕了! !!

Dennis Bergkamp6 days ago
Neocons love draining American taxpayer money in foreign countries, while Americans at home are struggling.

新保守主义者喜欢在国外耗尽美国纳税人的钱，而美国人正在家里在苦苦挣扎。

Jimmy5 days ago
"Matches the US Navy"? That's the funniest overstatement of the year! LOL

“媲美美国海军”?这是今年最搞笑的吹牛！哈哈哈哈！

brian5 days ago
Yeah but I bet they can't run into a cargo ship as good as we do

是啊，但我打赌他们没法像我们那样又好又快地把军舰开进货船里。