中国警告日本不要在争议岛屿附近挑衅 [美国媒体]

-------------译者：罗罗纳多索隆-审核者：罗罗纳多索隆------------



BEIJING (Reuters) - China's Foreign Ministry warned Japan on Wednesday not to take "provocative" action around a group of disputed islets in the East China Sea, saying Tokyo would have to accept the consequences.  

北京（路透社）——中国外交部周三警告日本不要在东海争议岛屿周围采取“挑衅性”举动，否则的话东京要接受后果。


On Tuesday, Japan said it had told China that any foreign naval vessel entering Japanese waters for reasons other than "innocent passage" will be told to leave by a Japanese naval patrol, signaling a potential escalation in a long-running dispute.

周二，日本称已经告知中国除了“无害通过”的理由之外，日本海军将对以其他理由进入日本海域的任何外国海军船只进行驱离，这表明两国长久以来的争议有可能会继续升级。


-------------译者：罗罗纳多索隆-审核者：罗罗纳多索隆------------

SPQR 1 day ago
- A world atlas published in November 1958, by the Map Publishing Company of Beijing, treats the Senkaku Islands as a Japanese territory and described them in Japanese name Senkaku Guntō (Senkaku Islands) and Uotsuri-Jima
-The People Republic of China's map authority from 1969 list the "Senkaku Islands" as Japanese territory.
- The Grand Atlas of the World Vol. 1 published in October 1965 by the National Defense Research Academy and the China Geological Research Institute of Taiwan records the Diaoyu Islands as Japanese and named them with Japanese names: On this map, Taiwan, China and the Senkaku Gunto were clearly divided by national borders.
- A 1970 junior high school geography textbook published by the National Institute for Compilation and Translation of Taiwan, the Diaoyu Islands were named Senkaku Gunto in the "Physical Map of the Ryukyu Islands". Senkaku Gunto and the Ryukyu Islands were clearly not included in neither in China nor Taiwan territory

——北京地图出版公司在1958年出版了一本世界地图集，把尖阁列岛当作日本岛屿，地图上还标上了日本用语。
——1969年的中国地图当局将“尖阁列岛”列成日本领土。
——台湾的国防研究院和中国地质研究所在1965年10月份出版的世界大地图第一卷中将钓鱼岛列为日本岛屿并用日本用语命名：在这张地图上，台湾，中国和尖阁列岛明显被国界分离开来。
——台湾国家编译和翻译局1970年出版的初中地理课本中，在《琉球群岛自然地图》中钓鱼岛以日本用语命名。尖阁列岛和琉球群岛显然不包含在中国或者台湾的领土中。

-------------译者：seabell-审核者：normalone------------

Richard 1 day ago
Let's be clear. Beijing's maneuvers in the South China and East China Seas have no basis in international law, little basis in history, and are, in fact, in preparation for possible war with the United States and its allies.

 澄清一下，北京在南海和东海的军事行动没有国际法上的依据，更别说历史上了，事实上它只是在做好与美国与其同盟国开战的准备。
 
Monty 1 day ago
I have been to China 4 times and they are disgrace to their formal self. Their lies and hypocrisy seems to hold no bounds and why they should not be trusted. China plays the long game to reach their goal and they play us for a fool. They manipulate their currency, they tax our goods out of market, and literally make up lies on TV as to give us a bad image. They can't speak truth their own people, why would they to the rest of the world? 

我去过中国4次，过去的中国将会以他们为耻（本句可能拼写错误，意思不确定）。他们有的是无止境的谎言和虚伪，正因如此，他们是绝不可信的。中国人为了达到目的会跟你虚与委蛇，你像傻瓜一样被耍的团团转。他们操纵人民币，给我们的产品加税以至于我们不得不退出市场。在电视上说谎使我们有错误的印象。他们甚至不能对自己人说实话，对其他国家的人更不可能了。

They are greedy and want the islands for oil, fish, and for strategic reasons to expand their influence and ability to strike further distances away. We knew they wanted the South China Sea for themselves and they wanted us out but we took no action. Obama should have early but now he makes it harder and harder because it gives the perception that any action is their legal action!

他们贪婪，为了石油，渔业资源， 为了扩大他们的影响，和增强其远距离打击能力的战略原因，他们想要那些岛屿。我们知道他们想把南海变成内海，想把我们赶出去，然而我们没有采取任何措施。奥巴马应该早点行动。如今他让形势越加不利，因为他在南海的作为给人的中国人是合法行动的观感。（东南亚国家的人民的英语没用办法，只能连蒙带猜，错了不要打我＝＝）

-------------译者：seabell-审核者：normalone------------

Iron Horse 18 hours ago
The only one making provocative acts or doing anything to raise tensions is China. Japan, Philippines and Vietnam all have complaints against China's provocative acts and China will have to accept responsibility for everything that happens.
They are forcing these countries to unit against Chinas constant treats to these countries sovereign rights.

 中国才是做出挑衅举动，造成紧张局势的国家。日本，菲律宾和越南都对中国的挑衅行为发出了警告，如果事态升级，中国要为之负责。
正是因为中国不停地威胁这些国家的主权，才导致大家不得不联合起来对抗中国。（treats?应该是想说 threats＝＝，觉得这些评论的人应该先在word上面修改下语法和拼写再发表）
 
Seymour 16 hours ago
China is a mess right now. Domestic pollution (debilitating smog, polutted water table) is on a legendary status, massive corruption involving deaths (Tianjin, Shenzhen, adulterated food, etc), fraud (Chinese stock market, mining companies). Its no wonder they are using the SCS as a way to deflect. State run media has done a great job of shielding the mainland public from its mischief. If they only knew....

中国现在一团糟。国内污染（雾霾，地下水污染）的严重程度前所未有（无法不吐槽，debilitating smog是个什么鬼polluted water table又是什么......LOL）大数额的贪污牵连到人员死亡的案例（天津，深圳，参假的食物等等），骗局（中国股市，采矿公司）。也难怪他们用南海来转移视线。国有媒体为了防止大陆人知道这些坏消息下了大功夫，哪天真相暴露就.......（应该是only if they know吧）

-------------译者：seabell-审核者：normalone------------

bigc 1 day ago
China has never fared well n an armed conflict against Japan. Japanese maritime SDF is no pushover. Not to mention JMSDF is backed by the British Royal Navy and United States Navy the two most powerful navies over the past 200 years. China should watch their butts or they may get sunk.

 中国不可能在与日本的冲突中占优势，日本海军自卫队可不是吃素的。更别说日本海军自卫队有英国皇家海军和美国海军，这两个200多年来世界上最强大的海军的支持。中国最好小心，不然海军要玩完儿了。
 
Klaus 19 hours ago
The robber threatening the victim with consequences...

强盗威胁受害者小心后果

Michael Nonya 1 day ago
LoL Keep talking like Japan is alone. You're delusional if you think 20 boats is enough to dominate the waters. The US has like 15 #$%$ carriers and all the support they will ever need. 11 carrier fleets and something 9 they could throw in to service if needed. 
China has a carrier, a few subs and a fishing boat LoL We would smash you so hard that you would be afraid of water for generations to come.

LOL，说的好像日本没有同盟一样。如果你认为20艘船就能控制海域，那真是犯了癔症。美国有15#$%$艘航母和所有人的支持。11艘航母已经服役，还有9艘随时能服役。
中国有一艘航母，一些潜艇和一艘渔船，LOL我们会狠狠地摧毁你们，以至于接下来世世代代你们都会畏惧大海。

-------------译者：seabell-审核者：normalone------------

tianlong 1 day ago
Diaoyu Islands are China's islands and China has every right to exercise freedom of navigation

钓鱼岛是中国的，中国有权力自由航行
 
Miky 1 day ago
Repeat someone's post: 
Unconditional surrendered Japanese had returned stolen China territories (Taiwan, Spratly, Paracel and other islands) within South China Sea to China as specified by international law signed by US, China, Japan and 5 other countries after WW2.
If the UN, Hague Tribunal and others are such wonderful things, they should be enforcing international law signed by US, China, Japan and 5 other countries after WW2.

 无条件投降的日本将其窃取的中国的领土（台湾，南沙群岛，  西沙群岛等）这些在南海的岛屿归还了中国，这在美国，中国，日本和其他五国在二战后签署的国际条约里面有清楚记载。
如果联合国海牙仲裁庭如此公正有效的话，他们应该强制执行美国，中国，日本和其他五国签署的国际条约
 
Kurt 1 day ago
Japan needs to find citizens willing to live on these islands and form communities.

日本需要找到愿意居住在那些岛屿上的人，形成聚居地。

-------------译者：seabell-审核者：normalone------------

Ozark Dragonfly 1 day ago
Isn't it interesting that China is making land grabs for islands simultaneously in the South China Sea! When they had the chance to be heard by an international court, they did not go. Why? Because they already know what they are doing is wrong. Perhaps their economic crisis will bring about a new government. It certainly would remain dictatorial, but hopefully more peaceful and pragmatic.

 有趣的是，中国同时在南海掠夺岛屿！当国际法庭传唤，他们有机会辩论的时候，他们却拒绝出席。为什么？因为他们心知肚明自己的所作所为是错误的。如果他们的经济危机能让新政府上台，当然新政府肯定也是独裁政权，但有可能会更加和平与实际。
 
Larry 1 day ago
the Chinese have been waiting since WWII for payback- they will continue to take traditional waters from the Japanese . the Japanese should be ready to defend their territory and I mean REALLY defend their territory.

中国人从二战结束后就开始希望报仇，他们会不停地夺走原属日本的海域。日本人要准备好保卫自己的领土了，真正地行动起来。
 
Skeptic 23 hours ago
Japan to China: Survival of the fittest.

日本与中国：适者生存

Andrew 1 day ago
The usual all talk no action rhetoric from China. Move along folks. Nothing new here.
China, grow a pair of balls and do what you say. I would like to see Japan teach you a lesson. You know, the same lesson they taught you back during the Sino-Japanese War and in Nanjing.

这是中国一向的态度，只谴责不行动。大家散了吧，没什么新鲜的
中国能不能长点胆子敢说敢做。我倒是愿意看到日本好好地教训你们。你知道的，像在中日战争时期和南京一样，好好地教训你们一顿。

-------------译者：z8975623-审核者：normalone------------

John 1 day ago
Why does Japan even have an army? Thought they cut the heads off of our soldiers in WW II and we beat the #$%$ out of them. What was the point of that war if we just give their country back, build them back up and let them have an army again. Did we not learn anything? Remember Germany after WW I. Yeah 20 years later they were at it again.
 
为什么日本没有军队？想想看他们在二战期间杀了我们多少人？而且我们也把他们给打成了翔。如果我们把日本交还给日本人自己手里，帮助他们重建国家并且允许他们再次拥有军队，那我们和日本的战争到底是为了啥？难道我们没有学到教训吗？记住了，德国在一战20年后发起了二战。
 
george 1 day ago
Issac, the self proclaimed "historian", simply brushed ove of sovereignty of Ryukyu issuse under a false phrase " under provision of San Francisco treat". There is no provision that stipulates that the U.S. is to "return" Ryukyu to Japan. The future of Ryukyu is to be determined per "future U.N. resolution". There has never been a resolution passed in the U.N. on Ryukyu. Instead, the U.S., merely a trustee holder under U.N. mendate, unilaterally decided without U.N. consent transfered Ryukyu to its former " colonial occupier" Japan. The "Republic of China" in Taiwan, then still held the U.N. seat as well as as the permenant member of the security council protested vigorously with no avail.
 
 Issac，这个自称为“历史学家”的男人，头脑简单地将琉球主权问题描述成“依据旧金山和约”，（旧金山和约里）没有一个条款说要美国“归还”琉球给日本。在每一次“联合国决议”中，琉球问题从来都是有待解决的。琉球问题在联合国上从来就没有通过任何一个决议，而美国，仅仅作为一个联合国中间人的托管国，却不经联合国同意，擅自将琉球岛交给它的前“殖民者”-日本。可怜那个拥有安理会常任理事国席位的”中华民国“，它的强烈抗议一点用都没有。