中国003型超级航母可能采用核动力 [美国媒体]

China’s Type 003 super aircraft carrier couldbe nuclear powered
中国003型超级航母可能采用核动力
file:///C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/msohtmlclip1/01/clip_image002.jpg
龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com
Credible reports indicate that China is alreadybuilding at least one conventional carrier in the 80,000-ton range and thereare rumors China’s Type 003 aircraft carrier will be nuclear powered.
据可信报道暗示，中国早已准备建造至少一艘传统动力航母，排水量约为8万吨，而且有传言说，中国的003型航母将采用核动力。
China is following up the domestically producedType 001 (copy of the small Liaoning carrier) —with the Type 002. The Type 002is expected to use conventional propulsion, along with a series oftechnological advances such as an EMALS (Electromagnetic Aircraft LaunchSystem) catapult system.龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com
中国正在继续建造国产001型（排水量更小的辽宁号航母的复制品）的下一艘，即002型。002型航母预计将采用常规动力推进，并具有一系列技术进步，如EMALS（电磁弹射系统）。
It makes sense that the PLAN would want a pairof ships; operating the CATOBAR (Catapult Assisted Take-Off But ArrestedRecovery) Type 002 carriers will require a significantly different skill setthan the first two, and it will be easier to produce that skill set with twocarriers than with one.
PLAN想要两艘航母是有意义的，使用CATOBAR（弹射起飞拦阻降落）的002型航母所需的技能与前两艘截然不同，而有两艘航母显然比一艘更容易掌握这些技能。
The Type 003, which largely remains on thedrawing board, is expected to displace 110,000 tons. The Type 003 carriers willbe the first ships since the 1950s built anywhere in the world to rival thelargest, most powerful U.S. supercarriers.
003型航母，大体上还处于设计阶段，预计排水量可达11万吨。003型航母将是自1950年代后，能够与美国超级航母在排水量和战斗力方面相匹敌的第一艘他国航母。
China will have a new generation of fighters anddrones (likely based on the J-31 stealth fighter) available by the time thefirst Type 003 is ready.
当第一艘003型航母准备服役的时候，中国将有新一代的战斗机和无人机（可能基于J-31隐身战斗机）可用。
China does not have a lot of naval bases aroundthe world, so having a nuclear-powered ship would address refueling issues.
在全世界，中国没有多少海军基地，所以拥有核动力航母可以解决海上补充燃油的问题。



1楼 TG
Chinais more than 50 years behind and they will copy only the most successful designand technology which is American. This design and layout is exactly like theGerald Ford Carrier. China lack experts to do its own R&D to develop itsown tech.
中国落后了五十多年，只会复制最成功的的设计和技术，也就是美国人的。这种设计和布局非常像福特号航母。中国缺少专家进行研究开发，以发展自己的技术。
Joe Wang 回复 TG
WrightBrothers also claimed anybody flies something with a pair of wings andmechanical powered propellers was stealing their invention and violating theirIP rights, though they themselves stole the technology from Gustave Whitehead.Americans have a lot talent and expertise in claiming credit where credit isnot due.
莱特兄弟还说过，任何依靠一对翅膀和机械动力螺旋桨飞行的飞行器，都是抄袭他们的发明而且侵犯了他们的知识产权，尽管他们自己还偷了Gustave Whitehead的技术。美国人声称有很多天才和专家，其实名不符实。
2楼Ghostwheel
Wait,I'm confused;
is it somuch so on the drawing board that they had to use a mockup of the U.S.S. GeraldFord CVN-78 ?
Or arethey actually copying its exterior design?
等下，我被搞糊涂了。
他们真的从设计开始就使用美国CVN-78福特号航母的模型吗？
还是说他们确实复制了它的外观设计？
NA DT 回复Ghostwheel
LOL..keeping consistent with basically all the tech they have.... a copy.....
爆笑…基本上和他们所拥有的所有技术一个样儿…复制品而已…
Joe Wang 回复 NA DT
CATOBARis a British innovation, the American stole the technology from the British.
弹射起飞拦阻降落是英国的发明，美国人从英国人那儿偷技术。
Luca Mazza回复NA DT
Idisagree
Catapultlauncher was scrapped by the US as they could not do it and China is doin it.If I am not wrong
我不同意。
弹射起飞被美国抛弃是因为他们做不到，而中国正在做，如果我没搞错的话。
（译者注：不理解啥意思，这伙计明显搞错了）
Andrew Worth 回复Luca Mazza
?All 11 US super carriers use CATOBAR.
？所有11艘美国航母都使用弹射起飞拦阻降落。
Luca Mazza回复Andrew Worth
Sorry,Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System
抱歉，我说的是电磁弹射系统。
James回复Luca Mazza
Thequestion is what is it that theirs succeeds at that ours doesn't. The Chinesemay accept the drop in launches for the lack of working with a steam catapult.They don't have a lot of experience with steam catapults so they may have justdecided that while it is inferior atm its still better to use what is atpresent a inferior system that has promise to become better in the future thanrelearn what will be two different systems.
问题在于，为什么他们成功了而我们没有。他们可以接受弹射失败，因为缺少使用蒸汽弹射器的经验。他们对蒸汽弹射器没有太多经验，所以他们可能决定就算是要用劣质系统，但最好也要用更有前途的劣质系统，而不是重新研究两个截然不同的系统。
The EMALSsystem is a future system that at present isn't as good as what we have in thesteam catapult. Part of the US problem is that we demand something that is ahuge leap in advancement instead of just improving steadily.
电磁弹射系统是未来的系统，现在还不够好，不能和我们的蒸汽弹射器相比。而美国问题的一部分就是，我们总是要求巨大的飞跃性跨越，而不是稳步前进。
Luca Mazza回复James
Pointis China was decades ago in development and now they have catched up the US andthey are surpassing them.
重点在于 ，中国几十年前就开始研发，现在终于追上了美国，而且还会超越他们（美国）。