如果希拉里当选总统，她将如何处理与中国的贸易关系？ [美国媒体]

If Hillary Clinton had been elected president, how would she be handling trade relations with China? Would she be imposing tariffs like Trump?

如果希拉里·克林顿当选总统，她将如何处理与中国的贸易关系？她会像特朗普那样征收关税吗？



Marian Hubbard
Hillary Clinton, like her husband and Dianne Feinstein has been a supporter and apologist for China for most of her career. Her ties are very close, and may contain some illicit payments to the Clinton Foundation.
She would not want to rock this very lucrative relationship by imposing tariffs.

希拉里·克林顿就像她的丈夫和黛安·范斯坦（注：参议院司法委员会民主党加州参议员）一样，在她的大部分事业生涯中，她一直是中国的支持者和辩护者。她和中国的关系非常紧密，并可能包含对克林顿基金会的一些非法付款。
她不会想通过征收关税来动摇这种利润丰厚的关系的。



Tim Morton
Hard to say what she would do. Maybe ask them how much money can you give to the Clinton Foundation. That might have an impact on her decision

很难说她会做什么。也许你可以问他们你能给克林顿基金会多少钱。这可能会对她的决定产生影响。

Steve Tarver
Probably not. She would listen to her accredited economic advisors, who actually understood the world economy, and peacefully resolved the issues.

可能不会。她会听取她认可的经济顾问的意见，这些顾问实际上了解世界经济，并能和平地解决这些问题。



Elliot Allen
Who cares? NEWS FLASH: Hillary didn't win.

谁在乎呢？新闻快讯：希拉里没有赢。

Richard Smith
you would need to ask her, or wait 4 years.

你需要问她，或者等四年。

Allison Brigandi
It’s hard to say. I can’t predict what she may or may not have done, but I’m sure that she would have handled things far more diplomatically. She already had a relationship with China, after being Secretary of State, had a familiarity with how things work, so would have I think, more success diplomatically.
Trump keeps slapping tariffs on everyone, it’s the little people that it’s going to bite in the ass.

怎么说呢，我无法预测她可能做了什么，也可能没有做过什么，但我相信她会更圆滑地处理事情。她已经和中国建立了关系，在担任国务卿之后，她对事情的运作方式有了一定的了解，所以我认为，她在外交上会取得更大的成功。
特朗普不断对每个人征收关税，只是一个到处咬人的疯狗。



Toddy Grimwall
She wouldn’t have done nothing because her husband was responsible for nafta! Although nafta promised more jobs for Americans . However, that wasn’t so because many company’s left the United States and took their jobs with them ! Trump is attempting to undo that !

她什么也不会做，因为她丈夫是北美自由贸易协定的负责人！尽管北美自由贸易协定承诺为美国人提供更多的就业机会。然而，这并不是，因为许多公司离开了美国，并带走了他们的工作！特朗普试图推翻这一切！

David Parker
There would be no trade war because she would not have have had Wilbur Ross in her government. The guy is a known fan of trade tariffs. Although the WTO is slow, at least it is safe.
Same with not pulling out of the Iran deal because John (warhawk) Bolton would also not be in government.
The Paris Agreement would still have the US in it as well.

不会发生贸易战，因为她的政府不会有威尔伯·罗斯（威尔伯·罗斯，美国投资家， 擅长重组不同行业的破产企业，诸如，钢铁、煤矿、电信、跨国投资公司和纺织等行业，尤其精通杠杆收购，有“破产重组之王”之称。2017年1月，被特朗普提名出任商务部长）。这家伙是众所周知的贸易关税的粉色。尽管世贸组织进展缓慢，但至少是安全的。
同样，美国不会退出巴黎协议，因为约翰博尔顿（鹰派）也不会参与政府。“巴黎协定”也将包含美国。

Stephen Hernon
That is a silly question. Hillary was for “open borders” and illegals so she would not ever put tariffs on China. She would be in the pocket of the globalists like Cook of Apple, Jamie Dimon and all the bankers , all of Silicon Valley led by Google who will sell their soul (and yours) to get into China and of course Obama who believed America is the problem in the world.

这是个愚蠢的问题。希拉里支持“开放边界”和非法移民，所以她就不会对中国征收关税。她将被关入如苹果的库克、杰米·戴蒙和所有银行家等全球主义者的囊中，以及由谷歌领导的硅谷，他们将出卖自己的灵魂(和你们的灵魂)以换取进入中国，当然还有奥巴马，他相信美国是世界上的问题所在。



Bill Zettler
Thanks for A2A.
As for tariffs and other possible sanctions on China, no, Hillary absolutely would not.
To understand why, realize that while it’s true that both parties are thoroughly beholden to billionaires, it’s not the same billionaires.
Silicon Valley billionaires, in particular, are very much in the Democratic camp, and are coincidentally the most dependent on having the Chinese build our phones and tablets and other devices driving the modern tech economy.
Trump and the GOP are beholden to entirely different billionaires. More old school, as a rule. That’s tobacco, oil, guns, and the like.
Also, Trump’s entire political persona is supposedly about protecting American workers from unrestricted immigration and unfair foreign competition. Hillary famously doesn’t give a damn about the American worker in any way. That’s the main reason she lost, because she cared so little about working class votes that she sprayed open contempt at them, like a skunk.
She was a champion of the TPP (her claimed reversal on that being a simple, albeit humongous, lie), and that would’ve enshrined our dependence on Chinese labor and tech.
I happen to think the sanctions are a poor idea, but hardly for the same reason Hillary would oppose them. I think they damage American agricultural concerns too much, because China naturally has imposed retaliatory tariffs on American food products.
I’m also very big on American tech companies, but I don’t think we should be so all-fired eager for cheap iPhones that we undercut what remains of our own industrial base. I think a vibrant American industrial sector is key to our health as a nation going forward; you can’t eat bombs.

谢邀
至于关税和其他可能对中国的制裁，希拉里绝对不会这么做。
要理解为什么，要认识到，虽然两党都完全依附于亿万富翁，但并不是同一个亿万富翁。
尤其是硅谷的亿万富翁，他们在民主党阵营中占了很大的比重，巧合的是，也是他们最依赖中国制造手机、平板电脑和其他推动现代科技经济的设备。
特朗普和共和党对完全不同的亿万富翁负有责任。比如更古老的学校，作为一种规则。那是烟草，石油，枪支之类的。

此外，特朗普的整个政治角色应该是保护美国工人免受不受限制的移民和不公平的外国竞争的影响。众所周知，希拉里根本不关心美国工人。这就是她输掉的主要原因，因为她对工人阶级的选票不太在意，所以她对他们公然蔑视，就像臭鼬一样。
她是TPP的拥护者(她声称那是一个简单的，尽管是巨大的谎言，她声称的逆转)，这将揭示如果她上任我们对中国劳动力和技术的依赖。

我恰巧也认为制裁是一个糟糕的想法，但与希拉里反对制裁的原因不同。我认为它们对美国农业的影响太大了，因为中国自然而然地对美国食品征收了报复性关税。
我对美国的科技公司也非常重视，但我认为我们不应该对廉价的iPhone如此热衷，以至于我们削弱了我们现有的工业基础。我认为，作为一个向前迈进的国家，一个充满活力的美国工业部门对我们的健康至关重要；你不能自寻死路。



Bhawan P. Singh
If elected, yes, she would have been nicely handling trade relations with China as any chief executive would, but certainly not losing her mind like Trump and imposing tariffs on China.
Mrs. Clinton saw three-pronged approach to the Asian region while broadening our relationship with China; and, always looking for ways to strengthen American treaty alliances in the region, namely with Japan, Phillipines, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Taiwan, Indonesia and India. Not sure if any of these are shithole countries!
Mrs. Clinton was also in favor of maintaining TPP that Trump withdrew from; furthermore, she wanted to elevate and harmonize the alphabet soup of regional Asian alliances, like ASEAN, SAARC, US-Japan, US-Korea, US- Australia, US-Singapore, US-Taiwan, US-Philippines bilateral alliances. Trump wants to withdraw all troops from Asia to save money and move them to the US West Coast.
Mrs. Clinton was in favor of forward-deployed diplomacy in Asia borrowing a term from the military. She was in favor of widening the scope, depth and breadth of American diplomacy in the Asian region.
Mrs. Clinton was in favor of amalgam of the above approaches, as each situation warranted, without unnecessarily provoking China into a trade war and harming our own domestic industry in a tariff war.
China has always been keenly aware of the superior military power of the United States and generally hewed to the principles of international law. In 2009 and 2010, China began to doubt American regional commitment and viewed American power as in decline. These observations led hardliners in the Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army to adopt a more assertive approach and become a selective stakeholder, picking and choosing when to act like a responsible great power, and when to assert the right to impose its will on its smaller neighbors.
As Secretary of State, Mrs. Clinton succeeded in developing an effective counter strategy to the Chinese ambitions and reasoned that America must not become involved in specific disputes in Asiam and instead encouraged China’s smaller neighbors to avoid facing China unilaterally – which China sought – in favor of dealing with China on a multilateral level, particularly through organizations such as ASEAN.
This is how foreign policy is conducted. You understand the region. You learn the region. You have a Plan A, Plan B and a Plan C for complex issues. You talk to people, you use diplomacy, you use traditional alliances that are good for the United States. You don’t go to any kind of war just because you can. Things that every single every American president has done since WWII, until president Trump came to office.

如果当选，是的，她会像任何一位总统一样，很好地处理与中国的贸易关系，但肯定不会像特朗普那样失去理智，并对中国征收关税。

希拉里克林顿在扩大与中国的关系的同时，会对亚洲地区采取三管齐下的做法；而且，一直在寻找加强美国在该地区的条约联盟的方法，即与日本、菲律宾、澳大利亚、新西兰、韩国、泰国、新加坡、台湾、印度尼西亚和印度的条约联盟。而不管这些国家中是否有一个是狗屁国家！

克林顿还赞成维持特朗普退出的TPP；此外，她还想提升和协调东盟、南（亚）盟、美日、美国-韩国、美国-澳大利亚、美国-新加坡、美国-台湾、美国-菲律宾等亚洲地区的双边联盟。而特朗普希望从亚洲撤出所有军队，以节省资金，并将他们转移到美国西海岸。
借用军队的术语，希拉里还希望在亚洲进行前瞻性外交。她赞成扩大美国在亚洲地区外交的范围、深度和广度。

克林顿夫人赞成在每一种情况下都采取上述办法，而不是不必要地挑起中国的贸易战，在关税战争中损害我们本国的工业。

中国一向敏锐地认识到美国的军事优势，并普遍遵守国际法原则。2009年和2010年，中国开始怀疑美国的地区承诺，并将美国的实力视为衰落。这些观察使CCP和人民解放军的强硬派采取了更加强硬的态度，成为一个有选择性的利益相关者，挑选和选择何时候采取行动成为一个负责任的大国，以及何时将其意志强加于其较小的邻国的权利。

作为国务卿，克林顿成功地针对中国的野心制定了一项有效的反战略，并认为美国不应卷入亚洲的具体争端，而应鼓励中国较小的邻国避免单方面面对中国——这正是中国所寻求的——而是支持在多边层面上与中国打交道，特别是通过东盟等组织。

这猜是外交政策的执行方式。你知道这个地区。你了解这个地区。你有一个解决复杂问题的A计划、B计划和C计划。你与人交谈，你使用外交手段，你使用对美国有利的传统联盟。你不会因为你可以而启动任何类型的战争。这是每一位美国总统自二战以来都做过的事，直到特朗普总统上台为止。