披露：美国海军如何摧毁中国航母 [美国媒体]

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------



Ah yes the “carrier-killer.” China is forever touting the array of guided missiles its weaponeers have devised to pummel U.S. Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (CVNs). Most prominent among them are its DF-21D and DF-26 antiship ballistic missiles (ASBMs) which the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has made a mainstay of China’s anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) defenses.

对了这就是“航母杀手”。中国永远在兜售他们的武器专家特意设计出来，对美国海军核动力航母进行连续打击的制导导弹阵列。其中最突出的当属解放军作为反介入和区域阻绝防御武器中的主力：DF-21D和DF-26反舰弹道导弹系列。

Beijing has made believers of important audiences including the scribes who toil away at the Pentagon producing estimates of Chinese martial might. Indeed the most recent annual report on Chinese military power states matter-of-factly that the PLA can now use DF-21Ds to “attack ships including aircraft carriers” more than nine hundred statute miles from China’s shorelines.

北京已经成功地让其重要的受众包括五角大楼里辛辛苦苦泡制中国军力估计报告的研究人员们相信了这一点。实际上，最近一份关于中国军事力量的年度报告实事求是地指出：解放军现在已经可以从中国海岸线规定的超过900英里的距离外，用DF-21D系列导弹“攻击包括航母在内的舰船”。

-------------译者：724519871-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Scary. But the U.S. Navy has carrier-killers of its own. Or more accurately it has shipkillers of its own: what can disable or sink a flattop can make short work of lesser warships. And antiship weaponry is multiplying in numbers range and lethality as the navy reawakens from its post-Cold War holiday from history. Whose carrier-killer trumps whose will hinge in large part on where a sea fight takes place.

恐怖。但是美国海军有自己的航母杀手。准确来说，拥有自己的舰船杀手：可以瘫痪或者击沉一艘航母，干掉小一些的战舰。由于美国海军开始从冷战后的历史假期中醒来，所以海军的反舰武器在射程，数量和致命性上都得到了倍增。谁的航母杀手更胜一筹主要取决于海战发生在哪里。

That carrier-killer imagery resonates with Western audiences comes as little surprise. It implies that Chinese rocketeers can send the pride of the U.S. Navy to the bottom from a distance and sink U.S. efforts to succor Asian allies in the process. Worse it implies that PLA commanders could pull off such a world-historical feat without deigning to send ships to sea or warplanes into thecentral blue. Close the firing key on the ASBM launcher and presto! it happens.

这一航母杀手意象在西方观众中产生共鸣并不为奇。这意味着中国的火箭专家能够在一定距离内将美国的海军送到海底，并使美国救援亚洲的盟国的努力付诸东流。更糟糕的是意味着中国的指挥官们不用舰船或者战机深入海洋就可以实现这一历史性的壮举。关闭反舰弹道导弹的开火键和要快！面对现实吧。


-------------译者：724519871-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Noah Hunter R26; a few seconds ago
China isn't going to attack the US fleet and we're not going to attack China. Any such engagement would rapidly move on to nuclear weapons and once that exchange was over Russia and India would pounce on what was left of China. They know that. As long as there's a balance of power there will never be a war between the great powers. Everyone will stake out their sphere of influence and an uneasy un-peace will prevail.
 
中国不会攻击美国舰队，而我们也不会攻击中国。任何交战将会很快滑向核战争，一旦停火，俄罗斯和印度将会扑向中国。他们知道的。只要力量保持平衡就不会有任何一场战争发生在大国之间。每个人都划分他们的势力范围，动荡不安就出现了。

Eventually climate change may change this equation not to mention population growth and the growing hostile actions of non state players. We are in for some yeasty times but it doesn't include some massive WW2 type naval battles.
 
实际上，气候变化也许会改变 这种平衡，更不要说人口增长和非国家力量的敌对行为。我们处在动荡之中，但是这种动荡不包括类似二战那样的海上战争。

John Jett R26; 2 minutes ago
Why are you people discussing American military capabilities? We don't need to know this because the Chinese don't need to know this. Just whose side are you people on?

为什么人们讨论美国海军的能力？我们不需要知道这个，因为中国也不需要。你们站在哪一边？

-------------译者：彼岸曼陀罗-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

dingding R26; 17 minutes ago
here's some fact for you the US lost not once but twice against China so stop dreaming at ever beating us.

这里给你说个真相，美国输给中国两次而不是一次，所以别做梦打败我们了。
 
jdm61cc R26; 21 minutes ago
So did the author forget about the SM3 Block 2A which has a range in excess of 900 miles and an intercept velocity of up to Mach 15? it is not only capable of shooting down ballistic missiles but also satellites and can be fixed from any USN and Japanese Defense Force ship with a full size VLS system and AEGIS radar? 

所以笔者是不是忘了海基型拦截导弹SM3 BLOCK 2A，其射程已超过900英里范围，拦截速度可达15马赫？它不仅能击落弹道导弹和卫星，也可以配备于任何装有全尺寸垂直发射系统和宙斯盾雷达的美国海军和日本自卫队战舰？

O_Pinion R26; 2 hours ago
A good illustration of why China is a danger to world peace. The Soviet unx and the US worked hard to put various treaties in place to avoid future conflict. If China won't agree to also join or abide by the same treaty terms then the US (and Russia) has no alternative but to ditch them.

很好的说明了为什么中国对世界和平是一个威胁。苏联和美国努力的做了各种条约来避免未来的冲突。如果中国不同意加入或遵守同样的协议条款，那么美国（和俄罗斯）没有其他选择，只能抛弃它们。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

shark  O_Pinion R26; an hour ago
DId Vietnam or Japan or Philippine join the treaty?

越南或者日本或者菲律宾加入了该条约吗？
 
DavePh  shark R26; 36 minutes ago
These countries do not have such weapons to be eligible to even be considered for such treaties. Like ICBMs MTCR and so forth.

这些国家现有的武器根本没资格加入这类条约。诸如洲际弹道导弹，导弹技术控制制度等等。
 
tteng  O_Pinion R26; an hour ago
China can't joined the treaty if both Russia and the US already broke the treaty.

如果俄罗斯和美国都已经违反了条约，中国就不会加入条约。
 
For example: Russia has been working on various short to mid range missiles. And the US installed land-based Aegis VLS in Europe that is basically taking a sea-launched missile system (not covered under the INF treaty) and moved it on land.

举例说明：俄罗斯已经在研制多项短程和中程导弹。美国则在欧洲部署了陆基宙斯盾垂发系统 起先部署的是海基导弹系统（中程核武器条约未禁止此项），然后把导弹发射系统移到了陆上。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

FredFernandez R26; 40 minutes ago
Commie China is world enemy #1 and the anti-Christ. Don't buy junk and toxic Chinese products. Anybody who trusts Chinaman is a fool because Chinaman don't have word of honor and integrity. Chinese violate their own word and disavow what they sign. Ugly bully Chinaman go home.

中国是世界的头号敌人，并且反基督。不要买垃圾有毒的中国产品。任何相信中国佬的人都是笨蛋，因为中国佬根本没有荣誉和正直的观念。中国人老是食言背信。丑陋的恃强凌弱的中国佬，滚回去.
 
vettel  FredFernandez R26; 39 minutes ago
There is no god
F china

没有上帝。
干翻中国。
 
FredFernandez R26; an hour ago
Commie China is doomed toast finished kaput and now bankrupt too.

中国是注定要失败的，现在也快完蛋咯。
 
RT Myths Debunked R26; 3 hours ago
The USN doesn't concern itself with the CCPs one bought and paid for 40 year old soviet ship with a ski ramp.
The CCP however does worry - a lot - about the USNs nuclear super carriers with catapults latest radar planes etc.
that's the impetus for developing weapons specifically to attack carriers.
The U.S. has better technical capability thus it opts for the better smart stealthy weapons like LRASM JASSM LRSO and so on.

美国海军并不担心中国人买的那艘苏制40岁高龄，有个滑雪坡道（讽刺起飞平台）的旧船。
倒是中国人在担心----很担心---美国海军有着弹射器和最新型号雷达舰载机等等的超级核动力航母。
这是他们特别针对攻击航母而研发武器的动力。
美国有更好的技术能力，所以可以选择更好的智能隐身武器，比如长距离反舰导弹，联合防区外空地导弹、远程防区外导弹等等。

-------------译者：时间快-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Flash Gordon R26; 26 minutes ago
"The United States is bound by treaty not to develop mid-range ballistic missiles comparable to the DF-21D or DF-26."

 大美利坚由于不发展中程弹道导弹条约的限制而无法开发类似DF-21D或者DF-26的导弹

"it would take years if not decades for weapons engineers to design test and field a shipkilling ballistic missile from a cold start."

 从零开始设计和发展一款战舰杀手导弹可能需要几年甚至几十年的时间。

Naivetè at it's finest...

 单纯真好
 
Nighthawk 572 R26; 35 minutes ago
China can put men and nukes in orbit the USA has to bum rides from the Russians.

 中国佬能发射人员和核弹进入轨道，美国却只能从俄国佬那里讨得顺风票。
 
Nighthawk 572 R26; 38 minutes ago
At any given time half of the US carriers are sitting tied to a dock with no planes in board. Hardly a hard target to take out.

任何时候总有一半的美国航母呆在港口里，而且没有任何飞机。所以要打掉这些航母其实没有那么难。
 
vettel R26; 41 minutes ago
If we fight nukes will end the war

如果我们（同中国人）开战，结局就是核冬天。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Nighthawk 572  vettel R26; 37 minutes ago
25 nukes and we get nuclear winter no one wins.

只要25发核弹，我们就进入了核冬天，没有赢家。

NinthCommsBatt R26; an hour ago
Can't we all just get along? Nope...remember the first Red Dawn.?...With two (or more) big dogs in the hood...sooner or later they're gonna fight! Well now we gotta nuke both the Ruskies and the ChiComs....nuculeaarrr combat toe to toe!!!!!! YEEEEHAAAA.

我们就不能好好相处吗？不......还记得第一部《红色黎明》吗？......两只（或者更多）大狗在美妙的幌子下.....过不了多久他们一定会打架！好吧现在俄罗斯和中国都有了核武器......针锋相对的核竞赛！！！啊啊啊啊啊。
 
tteng R26; 3 hours ago
Chinese carrier is not for China-rise but for post-China-rise-plateau. They are good for showing off one's strength if and when it needs to be shown.

中国的航母不是为了显示中国崛起，而是显示中国崛起后占据的地位。如果有必要炫耀武力的话，他们是很擅长这么做的。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

shark R26; an hour ago
Chinese Liaoning are capable of sinking at least 5 USA super advanced aircraft carrier.

中国的辽宁号有能力击沉至少5艘美国超先进的航母。
 
Of course the author wont mention such fact.

当然，作者是不会告诉你这个事实的。
 
Hugo Chang  shark R26; 41 minutes ago
Chinese Liaoning are capable of sinking at least 5 USA super advanced aircraft carrier. That is exaggerated statement.

中国的辽宁号有能力击沉至少5艘美国超先进的航母。这么说太夸张了吧。

DavePh  shark R26; 37 minutes ago
Dude we are not talking a war played in a video game designed and produced in Communist China...

哥们，我们不是在谈论由中国设计和制作的视频战争游戏......
 
avatar R26; an hour ago
The author watches too many hollywood movies. If you say the US is far too superior then why the worries including so many articles about the Chinese carrier & Guam killer missiles? There is no necessity for the expensive carriers because they are sitting ducks.

作者好莱坞大片看多了吧。如果你说美国装备领先太多，那为什么有这么多担心中国航母和“关岛杀手”导弹的文章呢？没必要部署这么多昂贵的航母，因为它们只是容易被击沉的靶子罢了。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------
 
Springfire R26; 2 hours ago
Yes of course US can take out Chinese carrier. The question is would Americans trade San Francisco or Los Angeles for the Chinese carrier? I think not.

是啊美国当然能摧毁中国航母。问题是美国人会把旧金山或者洛杉矶和中国航母交换吗？我认为不会。
 
DavePh  Springfire R26; 33 minutes ago
Come on dude get real. Do you really believe that China will strike at a US city with Nukes in retaliation? And do you know what will happen to Shanghai Bejing and the next 20 big cities of China?? Don't make lunatic assumptions on what China technically can do and for which it will be able to muster enough courage or madness to do...

得了吧二货，现实点。你真的认为中国会用核武器攻击一座美国城市作为报复？那你知道接下去上海北京和中国其他20大城市会发生什么情况吗？不要对中国技术上能实现什么做愚蠢的假设，要看他们实际上有没有足够的勇气或者疯狂去做什么......

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Inn0centSinner  Springfire R26; 2 hours ago
Hmm...if the PRC is so bent out of shape by the loss of their own carriers to justify making the US lose a city or two Chinese Commies would also have to be willing to lose Beijing or Shanghai. Perhaps it'll give Beijing leadership an opportunity to thin out the Chinese population while in the comfort of their own bunkers as Mao once did.

嗯.....如果中国对于以自己的航母群被摧毁为代价换取美国1-2个城市的损失很愤怒的话，那么中国也会不惜损失北京或者上海的。也许这还给了北京的领导人一个减少人口的机会，与此同时，他们可以像毛时代那样舒舒服服地躲在自己的地洞里.
 
Better to sell America's Asian allies all the weapons it needs then it'll be a good ol' fashioned Asians killing each other back to the stone age while the West spectates.

最好把所有他们需要的武器统统卖给美国的亚洲盟友，然后我们趁机让时髦的亚洲人自相残杀回石器时代，我们西方人可以当观众。
 
Springfire  Inn0centSinner R26; 2 hours ago
I don't think Americans will be spared if Asians start to kill Asians.

如果亚洲人互相残杀，我不认为我们美国人可以独善其身。

-------------译者：maggicqueen99-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Inn0centSinner  Springfire R26; 2 hours ago
Really? Did you not learn anything from Pearl Harbor? Pearl Harbor was the only reason US got out of spectator mode and is why China stands today. A coalition of Asians US and its NATO allies means PRC is done. I doubt PRC wants to see the an armada of Western navies off their coast.

真的？你从珍珠港学到了什么东西吗？珍珠港是美国脱离观望状态的唯一原因，也是中国今天崛起的原因。美国及其北约盟国与亚洲联手，意味着中华人民共和国已经成了世界一霸。我疑心中国想看到西方海军的舰队离开他们的海岸线。
 
Springfire  Inn0centSinner R26; an hour ago
Ok what is the reason for a coalition of Asians US and its NATO allies to attack China? Do remember that China are nuclear tipped as well and her ICBM's can reach every corner of the planet.

好吧，美国及其北约盟国和亚洲联手攻击中国的原因是什么？请记住，中国也是核大国，她的洲际弹道导弹可以打到蓝星的每一个角落。