民主党参议员布赖恩·沙茨删除了暗示美国当局在美墨边境使用“化学武器”的推文 [美国媒体]

Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz deletes tweet suggesting 'chemical weapons' used at US-Mexico border

民主党参议员布赖恩·沙茨删除了暗示美国当局在美墨边境使用“化学武器”的推文。



Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, .

夏威夷民主党参议员布赖恩·沙茨(BrianSchatz)

Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, tweeted Sunday that the use of tear gas against Central American migrants who attempted to enter the U.S. illegally may have been a violation of international agreements governing the use of chemical weapons -- before he backtracked.

夏威夷民主党参议员布赖恩·沙茨(Brian Schatz)周日在推特上发帖称，在他改变立场之前，对试图非法进入美国的中美洲移民使用催泪瓦斯可能违反了有关使用化学武器的国际协定。

The Associated Press reported that U.S. agents shot several rounds of the gas after migrants tried to penetrate several points along the border at the San Ysidro border crossing between Tijuana, Mexico, and California. Migrants sought to squeeze through gaps in wire, climb over fences and peel back metal sheeting to enter.

美联社(AssociatedPress)报道称，在墨西哥和加州之间的圣伊西德罗(San Ysidro)过境点，在发现移民试图穿过边境的几个过境点后，美国边境管理人员发射了几轮催泪瓦斯。这些移民们为了能够进入边境，试图挤过铁丝网的缝隙，翻开栅栏，扳开金属挡板。

In response to the reports, Schatz initially tweeted: "Tear gas across the border against unarmed families is a new low." Approximately 45 minutes later, Schatz tweeted: "Who gave the order? Did it implement or contravene policy?"
He then tweeted "WHO GAVE THE ORDER?" in all caps.

作为对这些报道的回应，沙茨最初在推特上发帖称:“越过边境向手无寸铁的移民家庭施放催泪弹是一个新的低劣手段。”大约45分钟后，沙茨在推特上再次写道:“谁下的命令?”这道命令的用意是执行政策还是违反政策?”
然后他在推特上用大写字母写道:“谁下的命令?”

Schatz then asked: "Why tear gas? Is this consistent with the Conventions on Chemical Weapons?"

然后Schatz问：“为什么要发射催泪弹？”
这是否符合“化学武器公约”？“。

However, the tweet was posted for just a few minutes before it was deleted and replaced by this message: "Anyone uncomfortable with spraying tear gas on children is welcome to join the coalition of the moral and the sane. We can argue about other stuff when we’ve got our country back."

然而，这条推文只发布了几分钟便被删除了，取而代之的是这样一条消息：“任何对向儿童喷洒催泪瓦斯这件事感到不舒服的人，都是充满道德和理智的。”
我们（民主党）可以在夺回我们的国家后再讨论（与之相关的）其他事情。“

In an exchange with opinion writer Stephen Miller, Schatz admitted that "I went ahead and deleted the one about chemical weapons because I just don’t know enough about what happened." He then asked Miller: "Does this not strike you as excessive?"

在与评论作家斯蒂芬·米勒(StephenMiller)的交流中，沙茨承认，“我已经删除了关于化学武器的那一篇，因为我对所发生的事情
不够了解。”
然后他问米勒：“你不觉得这件事太过分了吗？”

A spokesman for Schatz did not respond to Fox News' requests for comment.
Schatz, a former Hawaii state representative and lieutenant governor, was appointed to the U.S. Senate in 2012 to serve out Daniel Inouye's term after his death. Schatz was elected to his first full Senate term in 2016.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

沙茨的发言人没有回应福克斯新闻的置评请求。
前夏威夷州代表、副州长沙茨(Schatz)于2012年被任命为美国参议院议员，接替已故参议员丹尼尔·井上余下的任期
2016年，沙茨被正式选为参议员，开始了他人生中第一个完整的参议员生涯。
美联社对此做出过报道。

MoldySideOfBeef
He shat the bed with that statement
​
他的声明就好像被窝里拉shi。（表面光堂，里子脏）

SaginawSausage（回楼上）
Well they think it’s okay to nuke citizens, why should that know that CS gas isn’t a ‘chemical weapon’?

拿着核武器威胁了一圈人，为什么还要纠结催泪瓦斯是不是化学武器这类芝麻绿豆大的事呢？

Meatwarrior2018（回楼上）
Actually under the chemical weapons convention of 1993 CS gas is in fact a chemical weapon
Ironically though chlorine gas is not considered a chemical weapon

事实上，根据1993年“化学武器公约”规定，催泪瓦斯实际上是一种化学武器。
讽刺的事，氯气并不被认为是一种化学武器。

ObamaAngry
Agreed - White phosphorus would be a far better solution

同意！
白磷（燃烧弹）将是一个更好的解决方案。

dtlv5813
Republicans should plaster this and other idiotic comments from this guy all over and make a serious run at his
seat

共和党人应该把这个家伙的这番话和其他愚蠢的言论贴在大街小巷，然后认真地竞选他的席位

Dunkeliness（回楼上）
Uh he represents Hawai'i. There is literally no chance a Republican gets elected in his place. He is loved there.
Source: My cousin was stationed there last year. He says Republicans were non existent.

他代表夏威夷。
共和党人根本不可能取代他的位置当选。
他在那里很受爱戴。
消息来源：我表弟去年驻扎在那里。
他说共和党势力在夏威夷根本不存在。

stupidship
Wow ... using the term chemical weapon should not be used lightly without substantial evidence.

哇……在没有确凿证据的情况下，不应轻易使用“化学武器”一词。（译者注：自己啪啪打自己脸，以后拿什么指责叙利亚和俄罗
斯？）

cmiller1225（回楼上）
Par for the course with these people. They have already diminished serious terms like racist, fascists, misogynist,
xenophobe, sexist, nazi, etc.
There is little left that causes a shock-reaction.

对这些人来说就是正常操作。他们已经很努力地减少了诸如种族主义者、法西斯主义者、厌恶女性者、仇外者、性别歧视者、纳粹
主义者等等一堆大帽子。
对于民众来说，少了这些标签，还怎么扣键盘？
所以说这件事也就是一个小水花而已，不用大惊小怪。