reddit网友:日本拥有直升机航母已经好几年了,他们只是选择让F35B在改装过后的直升机航母甲板上起飞或降落。日本并不会建造一个真正的航母,因为建造真正的航母真的很贵,而且除非你需要让你的海军进行远洋投射......
Japan to have first aircraft carriers since World War II
美国网友讨论日本拥有自二战来首艘航母
YNot1989
Uh, they've had "Helicoptor Destroyers" for several years now, they've just elected to allow F-35B's to take off and land from their decks. Japan probably won't build a super-carrier anytime soon, partly because they're really really expensive and only necessary when you have to project power far beyond your shores, and secondly because its much more likely that Japan will figure out how to convert their entire airforce over to VTOL capable drones that can launch from much smaller carriers.
日本拥有直升机航母已经好几年了,他们只是选择让F35B在改装过后的直升机航母甲板上起飞或降落。
日本并不会建造一个真正的航母,因为建造真正的航母真的很贵,而且除非你需要让你的海军进行远洋投射,否则建造一个真正的航母毫无意义。
而且日本将来可能会将空军打造成具有垂直起降能力的无人机群,这样作为较小平台的直升机航母可以刚好派上用场。
agoia
They mentioned 10 F-35s per ship, suggesting they'd maintain the helicopter force since otherwise these ships should fit more than 10.
日本人提到每艘改造航母有将会搭载10架F-35,这意味着他们将维持航母上的直升机力量,否则这些航母应该能容纳10架以上的飞机。
They may be going for a model similar to the America-class, with air superiority and asw capabilities instead of strike/ expeditionary roles.
日本可能会选择一种类似美国直升机航母的模式,即不注重打击/远征能力,而是同时兼顾空优和反潜能力。
The rapid development of aircraft carriers by the Chinese puts planes much closer than land-based assets could respond to, so more flexible forces need to be developed.
中国航母的快速发展使得中国战机的前沿打击范围更深,这也意味着留给日本的路基武器反应时间更少,因此,日本需要发展更灵活的力量来应对这种局面。
Superfluous_Play
If there ever is a US-China war, Japan is going to be huge. They arguably already have the second strongest navy in the world. Definitely one of the most well trained and they have the advantage of being able to do what Russia, Iran and China do to the US. That is focusing funding and research on capabilities and weapons systems that can counter the strengths of China instead of trying to conventionally match force projection powers.
如果美中之间真的爆发战争,日本将发挥巨大作用。可以说,他们已经拥有世界上第二强大的海军。他们绝对是训练有素的国家之一,他们的优势在于能够像俄罗斯、伊朗和中国对美国所做的那样,剑走偏锋,把资金和研究集中在能够重点对抗中国薄弱项目的能力和武器系统上,而不是试图用传统的方式与中国硬碰硬。
LiveForPanda
Actually, China saw this coming when Japan was building these "helicopter carriers" which could be easily transformed into fixed-wing plane carriers.
At the time, Japan said they never intended to do that, but they all knew it was just a matter of time.
实际上,中国在日本建造这些所谓的“直升机航母”时就预见到了这一点,这些直升机航母可以很容易地改造成固定翼飞机航母。
虽然日本在建造之初曾表示他们从未打算对航母进一步升级改造,但中国人都知道这只是时间问题
Wermys
The best comparison is that US carriers are designed for sustained operations and strike a long way from there own supply lines with fleet support. While Japans carriers and other countries carriers like China India UK France are designed instead to provide support and limited strike capability in a defensive role. Even thought he QE is decent at both.
这很好比较。美国航母是为持续作战而设计的,从驻扎地启程,在舰队的支援下,沿着补给线出发,进行长途攻击。而日本航母和其他国家的航母,如中国、印度、英国、法国,则被设计成在防御战争中提供支持和有限的打击能力的角色。
Joehbobb
Japan spends around 42 billion a year on it's military but only 1% of it's GDP. It could if it wanted to (with Constitution changes) spend several times that and easily afford a few super carriers.
日本每年在军事上的开支约为420亿美元,仅占GDP的1%。如果它想通过修改宪法,把军事预算提高几个百分点,那么日本可以很容易建造几艘大型航母。
The Enemy State clause has been petition to be removed by both Japan and Germany on a number of occasions as a first and necessary step to the two nations gaining a seat on the SC. However in all cases Russia and China blocked their petitions. This is a big deal.
Japan is the only former Axis power that has not totally repented and refuted their actions in the war. So for publicity sake, particularly in China, Russia, and Korea (both Koreas), the Enemy State clause forms the perfect justification.
日本和德国已经多次请求删除敌国条款,这是第一步,也是必要的一步。只有删除了敌国条款,两国才有可能作为正常国家,进而谋求在安理会获得席位。
但针对这一问题,俄罗斯和中国都否决了它们的请求。
日本是前轴心国中唯一没有完全忏悔和自我批驳其战争行为的国家。因此,对于中国、俄罗斯和韩国/朝鲜来说,以敌国条款作为对日本开战的依据完美而又正当。
SerendipitouslySane
I'm sure that will work out well, given that the US is still a Japanese ally. A 79 year old treaty is not gonna fly in terms of public perception, lawful or no.
鉴于美国仍是日本的盟友,我相信这一问题很好解决。一个有79年历史的条约,无论合法与否,都不会影响公众的看法。
Otearai1
To be fair, it is good fish and arguably good porn.
那这么说就明白了,日本在美国眼里是一条好鱼,也可以说是一部好色情片。
我们致力于传递世界各地老百姓最真实、最直接、最详尽的对中国的看法
【版权与免责声明】如发现内容存在版权问题,烦请提供相关信息发邮件,
我们将及时沟通与处理。本站内容除非来源注明五毛网,否则均为网友转载,涉及言论、版权与本站无关。
本文仅代表作者观点,不代表本站立场。
本文来自网络,如有侵权及时联系本网站。
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...