（下）印度的ISRO是继NASA之后世界最成功的太空机构吗？ [美国媒体]

印度的ISRO是继NASA之后世界最成功的太空机构吗？




Mihir Lodhavia3
India reached Mars' orbit, while herneighbour is still trying to reach Kashmir.

印度抵达过火星轨道，然而它的邻居依然试图抵达克什米尔。



Andrew Manook4
What people don't understand is that ISROis not in a competition with others, its main objective was the development ofIndia and thus shouldn't be compared with others, it wouldn't make sense to.

人们不明白的是ISRO不是在和别人竞争，它的主要目标是印度的发展，因此不应该和别人比较，这是没有意义的。

jonathan kayina3
In order to reach highest level and quality. You need competition . Those rich countries are competitive and that's whythey live a high standard and quality life.

以达到最高水平和质量。你需要竞争。这些富裕国家是有竞争力的，这就是为什么他们拥有一个高标准和高质量的生活。

Tangent of circle.2
@jonathan kayinaSometimes, you need to focus most on yourself and compete with your past andpresent self rather than with others

有时候，你需要更多地关注自己，与过去和现在的自己竞争，而不是与他人竞争。



saroopk kallen4
Not 35%, actually Asians makeup only 2%from nasa website

没有35%，事实上根据NASA网站，亚洲人只占2%。

Sunil Ipe3
Not really but indians are 10% in all bigcorporates and nearly 20% in Microsoft

确实没有35%，但印度人在大公司的比例是10%，在微软的比例接近20%。

Slo Mo2
Another shinning example of Indianboasting!

又一个印度人自夸的经典例子！

Ayush1
Those who say that there are 2% Asians areabsolutely wrong. NASA though rarely provides ethnic contributions. But theresheer number of Indians is actually very large. Though they are not Indiancitizen anymore. Because they gave up the citizenship. So he should've saidlike 35% of Indian Origin(+Indian descent). The Indian diaspora is so high. Butunfortunately those who were once Indians don't think they are anymore. Theyconsider themselves more American. So the sentence he quoted is actually not astatement. Because it's truth value is vague. Read maths(logical reasoning) ifyou don't know difference between sentence and statement.

那些说亚洲人比例2%的是绝对错误的。
尽管NASA很少提供种族贡献。但印度人的绝对数量实际上是很大的。虽然他们不再是印度公民了。因为他们放弃了公民身份。所以他应该表述的是35%的印度血统。
印度移民的数量是如此之多。但不幸的是，那些曾经是印度人的人现在不这么认为了。他们认为自己更像美国人。

Vicky Soni2
Just imagine what ISRO could do with theNASA'S budget.

想像一下，要是ISRO拥有NASA那样的预算可以做些什么。



Abhishek Tyagi3
India's Mangalyaan project costed less thanthe total budget of movie "gravity"

印度首次火星任务的成本比电影“地心引力”都要低

Namdev Prabhu2
Abhishek Tyagi well said

说得好。

Zinther Z4
so now people know that india has the mostinternet potential, so they are posting clickbaits for indians

所以现在人们知道，印度的网络潜力有多大了，他们为印度敲击键盘。

4 24
lmao

笑死了。

Pratyush Kishore3周前
Facts are facts and one of them is that theIndian mars mission is the cheapest and most successful of its kind .

事实就是事实，其中之一就是印度的火星任务是同类之中最廉价最成功的。



anshul ahuja1
India
was first country to reach mars on 1st attempt

印度是第一个试图抵达火星的国家。

gaming2471
India
was only second country after China to develop rockets few hundred years ago.
And first to use in war. These Indian and Chinese old rockets were reverse
engineered by Europeans to make their own versions of it and go somewhere from
there. But around 1990s these same countries refuse to sell India engine to
power their rockets. But finally Russians came to rescue and helped with the
supply of engine and Indian scientists were able to make their own.

印度是仅次于中国数百年前就发展了火箭并首次应用于战争的国家。
这些印度和中国的老火箭由欧洲人进行逆向工程，制造出他们自己的版本，然后从那里走向某个地方。但在上世纪90年代左右，这些国家拒绝向印度出售火箭发动机。
但最终俄罗斯人前来救援，提供了发动机，印度科学家也能自己制造。



Andrew Ydna DuBuc4
Well,
I work in the manufacturing and education fields, so I love to hear about
advances such as this. It's sad when there are setbacks, but the successes are
triumphant! The specific news media that I read/listen mentions large news for
India, Asia, etc...but that type of news is "boring" so they instead
talk about the latest celebrity nonsense instead

我在制造业和教育业工作，所以我喜欢听到这样的进步。挫折是悲哀的，成功是胜利的! 我所阅读/收听的特定新闻媒体提到了印度、亚洲等国家的重大新闻。但这类新闻很“无聊”，所以他们会谈论最新的名人八卦

memegirl 19994
Of
course. But they'll make 2-3 hours of documentaries on poverty situation within
India.. Yeah of course, poverty exists, income gap is widening, but they
forget, a country which used to make up approximately 25% of the global GDP in
1800s, was left to only 1% of the global GDP after 1947. I feel sad, how
western media is responsible for demoralizing many of us into believing we are
literally filth when we definitely aren't, and they're on the god tier.

他们会制作2-3个小时关于印度贫困状况的纪录片。
是的，当然，贫穷是存在的，收入差距在扩大，但是他们忘记了，一个在19世纪占全球GDP大约25%的国家，在1947年后只占全球GDP的1%。我感到悲伤,西方媒体以诋毁为职责让我们许多人相信我们真的肮脏，他们很圣洁，然而我们没有。



Sushil Yadav4
Chandryaan-1
mission

月船1号任务。

Supreme Leader4
not
discovvered first but confirmation of esistence of water molecules but NASA
discovered water ice on moon

不是首次发现的，而是对上面水分子的存在进行了确认，NASA发现了月球上有冰。

Ajay Singh4 （）
ISRO
didn't actually. It was still NASA because the sensors of Chandrayan-1 was from
USA. It's called M3 scanner and Mini-SAR. ISRO couldn't had done it without
American aid.

ISRO并没有。其实是NASA首次发现的，因为月船1号上的传感器都来自美国，被称为M3扫描仪和Mini-SAR。
没有美国的援助，ISRO没法做到。

Nitish Kumar Sharma4 （）
That's
not true. NASA published before ISRO but it was actually MIP(Moon Impact probe)
that discovered lunar water. Both were on Chandrayaan-1. ISRO's MIP had already
discovered water but the paper was sent to NASA for confirmation. On Sep 24
NASA published their papers. On Sep 25, 2009 ISRO announced that they had
discovered water on moon. Recent announcements were in continuation to previous
NASA announcements. Agencies acknowledged that MIP discovered water before M3
but NASA published their papers a day before. Info is public on Wikipedia too.

不对。
NASA在ISRO之前就已经发现了，实际上是月球撞击探测器发现了月球上的水。类似的传感器后来也装在月船一号上。ISRO的月球撞击探测器发现了水，但这篇论文被送到了NASA进行确认。9月24日，NASA发表了他们的论文。
2009年9月25日，ISRO宣布他们在月球上发现了水。最近的公告延续了NASA之前的公告。各机构承认。维基百科上的信息也是公开的。