中俄准备好:美空军400枚新的洲际弹道导弹 [美国媒体]

空军计划打造至少400枚新的高科技洲际弹道导弹,确保消灭任何想要发动核攻击的敌人,以此保障数百万人的生命安全。这个计划是为了防止大国战争。美国网友:这些将要替换现行条约允许保有的旧的洲际弹道导弹。尽管没有新的军备竞赛,但俄罗斯已经采用先进的技术更新了400多枚洲际弹道导弹。


-------------译者:jiangshubiao-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------



Air Force plans to build at least 400 new high-tech ICBMs intended to preserve millions of lives by ensuring annhiliation of anyone choosing to launch a nuclear attack. The idea is to prevent major power wars.

空军计划打造至少400枚新的高科技洲际弹道导弹,确保消灭任何想要发动核攻击的敌人,以此保障数百万人的生命安全。这个计划是为了防止大国战争。

The Air Force is now uating formal proposals from three vendors competiting to build hundreds of new next-generation Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles designed to protect the US homeland well into the 2070s and beyond service officials said. 

官方报道,空军正在评估来自三个供应商的正式方案建议书。三个供应商竞争建造数百枚新的下一代洲际弹道导弹,弹道被设计用来确保美国本土安全到2070年代,然后导弹就退役。

Submissions from Northrop Boeing and Lockheed are now being reviewed by Air Force weapons developers looking to modernize the US land-based nuclear missile arsenal and replace the 1970s-era Boeing-built Minuteman IIIs. 

来自诺斯罗普、波音和洛克希德的方案正由空军武器研发人员审核。这些人负责现代化美国路基核导弹库,替换掉1970年代波音生产的民兵3型导弹。


-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Rey
Why is the talk of WW3 and nuclear weapons on the up tick over the past few months? I find this unsettling. And I find the fact that Hillary Clinton may win the Presidency and already has a major grudge against Russia and a very confrontational stance towards them even more unsettling.
"Clinton is supposedly declaring war on Russia by pushing for an intervention in Syria and given that the U.S. and Russia are both nuclear powers a Hillary Clinton presidency “is a mushroom cloud waiting to happen” ~ Jill Stein

在过去这几个月里,为什么关于第三次世界大战以及核武器的讨论不断升温?我觉得这很令人不安啊。
并且,我发现希拉里可能会赢得总统选举,而她目前已经对俄罗斯心怀怨恨,摆出了极具对抗性的姿态,这就更加地令人不安了。
“通过推动美国对叙利亚的军事干预,希拉里应该会对俄罗斯宣战。而由于美国和俄罗斯都是核大国,希拉里成为美国总统将意味着‘蘑菇云即将升起’”—— 吉尔·斯特恩。

Mark Greenfelt
Russian trolls are proliferating without limit.

俄罗斯的发帖者在这评论区里肆无忌惮地横行啊。

Daddy D
Could be a Trump troll. Saying Hillary will start a nuclear war.

也可能是支持特朗普的发帖者,他们声称希拉里会发动核战争。

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

georgedang2016
Say goodbye to planned Russian reduction of their ICBM fleet. Not to mention China can probably roll ten times that much off assembly lines for a tenth the cost now that they have a reason to. Have fun with that.

如果美国这样做的话,那就和俄罗斯削减洲际弹道导弹数量的计划说再见吧。
更不用说中国很可能会以十分之一的成本从流水线上批量生产出十倍数量的洲际弹道导弹,而且他们现在也完全有理由这样做了。
好好享受这个局面吧!

Shelly
These aren't additional ICBM's but replacements. The Russians have been doing the same and have replaced over 400 ICBMs with much superior technology.

这些并不是额外增加的洲际弹道导弹,而是现有洲际弹道导弹的替换。俄罗斯也在做着同样的事,他们已经用技术先进得多的新型洲际弹道导弹替换了400多枚的旧型导弹。

Freddy Di Guglielmo
Russia is not reducing it's nuclear arsenal.. under the last nuclear treaty.. H Clinton and company agreed that the USA had to dismantle some 1500 missiles and allow Russia to build some 700 more to reach an EQUAL nuclear distribution of global power.. EQUALITY AT IT'S FINEST.

俄罗斯并没有在削减他们的核武库。根据最新的核裁军条约,希拉里和她的同伙们同意美国拆除大约1500枚洲际弹道导弹,而与此同时允许俄罗斯再增加大约700枚,以实现全球大国的核武军力分布平衡。这样的“平衡”真是好啊!(注:最后一句是讽刺)

-------------译者:暴龙哥-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Errick458
The US didn't have 1500 missiles to dismantle prior to New START and the limits on deployed delivery vehicles is 700. Your comment is so factually wrong as to be unbelievable. The Russians have over 7000 nuclear weapons. They don't need to build anymore since they are the successor state to the Soviet unx and the limit for deployed strategic nuclear warheads is 1550 under New START on 700 launchers.
You can read the treaty on the State Department's website.

在《新削减战略武器条约(New START)》签署之前,美国并不需要拆除1500枚导弹,而对运载工具的限制是700。你的评论是如此的离谱,真让人难以置信。俄罗斯已经拥有超过7000枚核武器。他们并不需要再建造了,因为他们从苏联那里继承和限制了核弹头的数量在1550枚,新的武器削减条约规定是700个发射器。
你可以在国家的官网上看到该条约。

Mark Greenfelt
Another Russian Troll. You already know the specs for the RS-28 the replacement for Satan or the SS-18 the 100 ton giant and that is above the SS-25 and the SS-27 that are all newer than the US Minuteman.

又一个俄罗斯喷子。你知道俄罗斯在研发RS-28替代100吨的SS-18撒旦。比SS-25 和SS-27都厉害,而后二者又比美国的民兵导弹新。

-------------译者:珂求一生-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Ker Pala
I think we should spend more money on Mars mission and move our people over there. We should take over the Whole Mars and declare it was America 2.
Lets start living there. Let Chinese and Russians rot in this earth.

我认为我们需要在火星任务上多花钱,然后移民过去。我们应该统治整个火星并命名为美国2号。让我们生活在美好的火星吧,让中国人和俄罗斯人在地球苟活吧。

innnocent
only russia can really do what you think

只有俄罗斯能做你想的这些。(对上述者说的吧)

WIllWallace12
YEEEEAH. The first Russian probe to land on Mars didn't take one picture because the parachute landed on top of the camera. In the mean time we have landed multiple landers and rovers. Bite me. 

好极了。第一个上火星的俄罗斯探测器因为降落伞遮住了镜头而没有拍下照片。同时,我们美国人登上了许多登陆者和流浪者。(指的是探测器)来喷我啊。

Elvis
That's more than tripling our ICBM force. Guess a new nuclear arms race is coming. With the United States Russia China India & Pakistan all steadily increasing the size of their nuclear arsenals. Soon we will start having those drills again and citizens will be building private shelters again as we hit 10s of thousands of deployable nukes.

比我们的洲际弹道导弹多三倍多。随着美国、俄罗斯、中国、印度和巴基斯坦一直在扩大他们的核武器兵工厂,新一场核武器装备比赛将要进行。马上我们就要开始军事演习,百姓又要开始建造私人避难所由于我们发射了成千上万个已部署的核武器。

-------------译者:肉松饼-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Shelly
These are replacing older ICBM's allowed under the treaty. No new arm's race but the Russian's have already replaced over 400 ICBM's with superior technology.

这些将要替换现行条约允许保有的旧的洲际弹道导弹。尽管没有新的军备竞赛,但俄罗斯已经采用先进的技术更新了400多枚洲际弹道导弹。

Mark Greenfelt
Russian trolls are proliferating.

这里的俄罗斯网民真多。

Peter Arhangelsky
"plans to build at least 400 new high-tech ICBMs intended to preserve millions of lives"
Priceless.

“计划制造至少400枚新型高科技洲际弹道导弹,旨在拯救数百万人的生命”
至高无价。

Thomas Fung
This seems to be a sad waste of money. Land-based ICBM's encourage not discourage preemptive strikes on the US homeland. By contrast ballistic missile submarines provide a much more credible and secure nuclear deterrent that is invulnerable to both first and second strike capabilities.

看上去这是一个浪费钱的计划。 陆基洲际弹道导弹并不能阻止美国本土遭受敌方先发制人的打击。 相比之下,潜基弹道导弹可以提供更可信以及更安全的核威慑,敌方的第一次和第二次打击能力对其都是无解的。

Cdog999999999
Preemptive strikes by who? Only Russia can come close to attempt that and with dire consequences.

遭受谁先发制人的打击?只有俄罗斯才有可能会做这种事并且带来非常可怕的后果。

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Mark Greenfelt
Sea based ICBMs are definitely not more secure and also lixed to a very limited number of ports.

海基洲际弹道导弹绝不会更加安全,搭载它们的弹道导弹核潜艇也是和非常有限的几个军港联系在一起的。

Daddy D
Are there advantages to sea based ICBM's? Is the launch to detonate time any shorter? Just curious and you seem knowledgeable.

海基洲际弹道导弹有什么优点吗?它们从发射到核弹头引爆的时间会更短吗?我只是对此感到好奇,而你看起来在这方面懂得不少啊。

Dave McDuff
It's about their ability to hide. The enemy supposedly knows where most of the land ICBMs are whereas the Tridents have super secret patrol orders that cover thousands of square miles of ocean... including right up to the enemy's coasts. That's the idea anyway.

海基洲际弹道导弹的优点在于它们的隐蔽性。敌人应该清楚我们大部分陆基洲际弹道导弹的所在位置,而搭载三叉戟导弹的核潜艇拥有高度机密的巡航任务,其活动范围能够覆盖数千平方英里的海域,甚至可以直达敌国的沿海。这就是部署海基洲际弹道导弹的道理。

Tom
To keep the peace arm for war.

能战方能止战!

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

WIllWallace12
So um will all the components on our missiles be made in China? Kind of ironic. The only thing we can build right now is Tupperware. Hopefully this will be a wake up call that maybe we should have industries here in the US that can supply our defense needs.

嗯,那么我们导弹的部件也都会是中国制造的咯?这有点讽刺吧。
当前我们还能制造的东西就只剩下特百惠了。(注:特百惠是美国的塑料保鲜容器厂家)
希望这能够为我们敲响警钟,也许美国本土应该具备那些能够满足我们国防需求的工业。

Albert Cattell
To be the world leader it would have to be the fastest ICBM on the market which would almost certainly require a scramjet or ramjet engine and possibly a railgun launching option although that may make it vulnerable to EMP counter measures. Mobility is also critical. As the director of warfare stated any future war envolving nuclear weapons would rely on much smaller and more mobile units to avoid detection by counter measures.

要想在世界上处于领先地位,它必须成为速度最快的洲际弹道导弹,采用超燃冲压发动机或亚燃冲压发动机几乎是必然的,也许还需要一个借助电磁轨道炮发射的方案,尽管这可能会使其易于遭到敌方的电磁脉冲反制措施的伤害。机动性也很关键。正如战争指挥官所说,任何动用核武器的未来战争都将依赖于体积更小、机动性更强的发射单位,以避免敌方反制措施的侦测。

R. Arandas
Honestly I prefer peace to war...today is the day of the election by the way and whoever wins our nation will be changed forever.

老实说,我更想要和平而非战争······
顺便说一下,今天是美国大选的日子,而无论哪个人当选,我们的国家都将被永久地改变。

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

davidjordan
What a waste of time reading this article. All nuke powers including Israel are developing their arsenals with several nations carrying 10 warheads per missile. Each advesdary has the same plan with missiles spread out and mobile & silos. The trajectory map illustrated is the same as the missile being Minuteman III being replaced.

阅读本文真是浪费时间!所有核大国(包括以色列在内)都在发展他们的核武库,其中有几个国家的核导弹每一枚都可以携带10个弹头。每个对手国家同样都有把核导弹分散部署于固定发射井中和移动发射车上的计划。文中所画的未来新型导弹的弹道示意图竟然与将要被其替换的民兵3型导弹是一样的啊。

Random guy
As the only country that used Nuclear Weapons on civilians this news is very disturbing.

作为唯一对平民使用过核武器的国家(美国),这则消息实在是让人不安啊。

granheim barabossa
Last year Russia increased their ICBM numbers by 1600. Of those nearly 500 were of Tsar bomb size. Weapons of those magnitude don't even have to detonate close to the ground. 10 miles up and the entire eastern seaboard would be burnt to a crisp.

去年俄罗斯的洲际弹道导弹数量增加了1600枚,其中有将近500枚是沙皇炸弹级别的(注:沙皇炸弹是由前苏联制造的、人类历史上爆炸当量最大的核弹)。这么大当量的核武器甚至不需要在接近地面时才引爆,只需在10英里的高空引爆,整个美国东部沿海地区就将化为焦土。

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Peter Arhangelsky
Last year Russia increased their ICBM numbers by 1600. - FALSE STATEMENT
Current Russian ICBM number is about 500.
Nearly 500 were of Tsar bomb size. - FALSE STATEMENT
Tsar bomb was 50 megaton yield. Most of modern nukes including Russian are less then one megaton yield.
What is the point of making such a lame comment?

去年俄罗斯的洲际弹道导弹数量增加了1600枚。—— 错误的说法!
当前俄罗斯的洲际弹道导弹数量大约是500枚。
其中有将近500枚是沙皇炸弹级别的。—— 又是错误的说法!
沙皇炸弹的爆炸当量相当于5000万吨TNT炸药,而包括俄罗斯在内所拥有的大多数现代核武器的爆炸当量都小于100万吨。
你发表这样拙劣的评论究竟目的何在?

granheim barabossa
Russia scrapped and recycled their small cold war nukes and manufactured new state of the art ICBM's. If you really think they kept their numbers at 500 you are really ignorant. A cursory web search will verify the numbers.
A Tsar bomb is originally described as a 700 megaton yield. One was set off in northern Russia but was scaled back to 100 megatons. Current Hydrogen type nuclear weapons ARE 1 megaton or less. But the Russian Tsar bombs are NOT Hydrogen based.
The point of making such a comment shows that I'n NOT ignorant. I don't believe the bullshit the liberal government tries to spoon feed me.

俄罗斯对他们冷战时期的小型核弹头进行了报废和回收,并且又制造了尖端技术水平的新型洲际弹道导弹。如果你真的相信俄罗斯把他们的洲际弹道导弹数量保持在500枚,那么只能说你很无知。你只需在网上做一个粗略的搜索就可以核实这一数量。
沙皇炸弹原先被描述为具有7亿吨TNT当量,其中一枚在俄罗斯北方试爆,不过爆炸当量被裁减到了1亿吨。现在的氢弹型核武器的爆炸当量不超过100万吨,但俄罗斯的沙皇炸弹并非氢弹型核武器。
我发表这条评论的目的在于表明我绝非无知。我并不相信美国的自由派政府试图灌输给我的那些胡说八道的说法。

-------------译者:Linsanity2018-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Dodo
In my humble opinion Russia and China simply won't worry at all. US already has second to none trident SLBM fleets which can destroy their lands many times. Add a few hundred land based ICBM won't increase this threat but drain its defense resources. Likely Russia and China would continue their developments of making their ICBM and SLBM more capable to penetrate US NMD.
Hold lots of weapons which you cannot use until you decide to mutual destruction is not wise.

依我拙见,俄罗斯和中国一点都不会担心。美国已经拥有了一支无可匹敌的三叉戟潜射洲际弹道导弹力量,这足够摧毁敌人的国土很多次了。再增加数百枚陆基洲际弹道导弹也无法进一步提升威慑水平,反而会让美国的国防资源消耗殆尽。俄罗斯和中国很可能会继续发展自己的洲际弹道导弹和潜射弹道导弹,以使得它们有更强的能力去穿透美国的国家导弹防御系统。
如果你保有大量的某种武器,但却无法在冲突中使用它们,除非你决定要和敌人同归于尽,那么大量地保有这种武器就是不明智的。

barry ray
Why dont we provide our children with a better education ourselves with better healthcare and our infrastructure with better maintenance instead?

与其把钱花在这种导弹上,为什么不为我们的孩子提供更好的教育,为我们自己提供更好的医保、修建更好的基础设施并进行更好的维护呢?

superbob
they would have to be hypersonic to really be any use... no the path is to make them useless would be to create focused laser (photonics) plasma and EMP weapons. they have the speed capacity and are by nature defensive weapons.

如果这些导弹想要有任何实际用处的话,它们必须要能够达到高超音速。
要让这些导弹失去作用,就需要研发出聚焦激光等离子体武器或者电磁脉冲武器,这些武器具有极高的速度能力,并且本质上属于防御性武器。

-------------译者:izzmo-审核者:龙腾翻译总管------------

Tony fernandez
Defense spending is necessary--think of the cost of human lives if we didn't have ICBM what would happen to us? Some people simply do NOT THINK.
Just saying..I enjoy whenever these Russian trolls say their ICBM are more "technologically advanced" ( that's what they want to BELIEVE or what Putin wants them to believe.) We had Atomic bombs when no country had them; we had stealth jet planes 
(and since the 70's by the way) when nobody had them and so forth. Just saying...

国防支出是必要的。想想人类生命的成本,如果我们没有洲际核弹,我们会遭受什么?有些人就不会思考。比方说,我很欣赏俄罗斯喷子说他们的洲际导弹技术更加先进(这是他们想相信,也是普金想让他们相信的)。在其他国家都没有的时候,我们就有了核弹,还有隐形战机(顺便提一下,是从1970年代开始)。我就举个例子……

innnocent
usa is amateur illusion russia surpus all techs make your research before you spit

美国是业余的,是幻觉,俄罗斯在所有的科技都领先,在你喷之前先调查下吧

Tony fernandez
I've done my research. I've studied. Russia is not high-tech. The US was the First nation with atomic bombs or was it Russia?
Everything in my comment is the TRUTH. All points in my comment 100% TRUTH--undisputed. And there's A LOT MORE however I won't bother discussing them with you. Good day!

我已经做过调查了。我学过了。俄罗斯科技不发达。美国还是俄罗斯第一个研发出了核弹?我所有的评论都是事实。我评论里100%的观点也是事实——是不可辩驳的。还有更多事实,我不高兴和你讨论了。你开心就好!

阅读: