共和党如何不再爱恋中国 [美国媒体]

-------------译者：整天喵喵喵-审核者：liudingxun------------



The New York Times editorial board has condemned the GOP’s new platform just authorized at the Republican National Convention as the “most extreme” in memory. This may well be the case but the platform is also remarkable for something the Times does not comment on: belligerence and a new cynicism towards China. To show how this really is something new this article reviews GOP platforms since Nixon’s rapprochement with China and traces the evolution thereafter of GOP disillusionment.

纽约时报编辑社谴责美国共和党最近在共和党全国代表大会上通过的新纲领为有史以来“最极端”。也许确实如此，但新纲领也有纽约时报没有评论的特点，那就是针对中国的战意和新的嘲讽语气。为了展现新纲领的这一新特点，本文将回顾自从尼克松与中国建交以来共和党的纲领，并追溯在共和党幻想破灭之后的变革。

 -------------译者：整天喵喵喵-审核者：liudingxun------------

In 1972 the Republican platform boasted “President Nixon’s visit to the People's Republic of China was . . . an historic milestone in his effort to transform our era from one of confrontation to one of negotiation.” Relations between the two countries were seen as promoting “an important contribution to world peace” as the 1976 platform reaffirmed. Despite cultural and political differences the relationship was based above all on “the need to maintain peace and stability in Asia” as the 1980 platform put it. In 1984 Republicans spelled out what they meant by the euphemistic “peace and stability”: “Despite fundamental differences in many areas both nations share an important common obxtive: opposition to Soviet expansionism.” By 1988 when Reagan’s détente with the USSR was in full swing the platform approved later that year cut out the anti-Soviet rhetoric basing the U.S.–China relationship instead on “mutually beneficial trade” and China’s continued economic and political opening up.

 在1972年共和党纲鼓吹尼克松访华...“这是尼克松努力将我们的时代从对峙一方，转为了协商的一方的一个历史的里程碑”。在1976年党纲又反复强调，中美两国的关系被视作“对世界和平的重大贡献”。1980年党纲写到，尽管中美两国存在文化与政治的差异，但两国关系全然基于“维持亚洲和平与稳定的需要”。在1984年共和党通过“和平与稳定”这种委婉的表达阐明了他们的立场：“尽管两国许多领域存在根本性的不同，两国有一个重要的共同之处：反对苏维埃扩张主义”。到1988当里根与苏联关系缓和正全面展开，党纲在当年不久就表示应和，删去了反苏维埃的言辞，重新将中美关系基于“互利共赢的双边贸易”和中国持续的经济和政治开放上。


-------------译者：整天喵喵喵-审核者：liudingxun------------

thesurvivor
The next US president whoever he or she may be will soon learn that US exceptionalism is thing of the past. China will not accept double standard. If US accuses China of currency manipulation then be prepared to open up their own record for examination e.g quantitative easing.

 无论下届美国总统是谁，他/她都将会认识到美国例外论已经过时了。中国不会接受双标。如果美国指责中国操纵汇率，那他自己就应该做好公开他自己记录的准备，让大家检查，例如量化宽松。（译注：美国例外论即神话美国的优越性）

truthsojourner
Always good to hear from the Chinese Foreign Ministry . . .

 从中国外交部听到消息总是好的

dagger906
You do realize the money-printing is bad for your static income and savings right? There's a limit to how much international market can gobble up the dollar. That dollar in your pocket will worth less the more money Feds print.

 你们不明白印钞票对静态收入与储蓄权力是有害的？国际市场能买进囤积的美元是有限的。银行印的钞票越多，美元贬值就越厉害。

 -------------译者：liudingxun-审核者：liudingxun------------

dagger906
I prefer the phrase "money printing." It feels less hypocritical when you say it.

我喜欢“印钱”这句话。当你这么说的时候感觉不到虚伪。

Bankotsu
I like the 2016 GOP platform on China. It shows maturity. I am going to support the GOP ticket for U.S. President based on the 2016 GOP China platform.

我喜欢共和党2016年关于中国的纲领；这意味着成熟。我将支持以2016中国议题为纲领的共和党总统候选人。

tom
You are in the same side of most Chinese people in support a Trump leading USA although for different reasons.

尽管原因不同，但是你和大部分中国人的倾向一样，支持特朗普领导美国。

Bankotsu
Trump is for peace most people who values peace will support Trump.
If you are for war like neo cons you will support Hillary.
All the hardcore neo cons are flocking over to Hillary and rejecting Trump. Only Hillary can satisfy their lust for war chaos and destruction.

特朗普意味着和平！热爱和平的人民将支持特朗普。
如果你像新保守主义一样好战，那就支持希拉里。
所有顽固的新保守主义者们都涌向了希拉里并拒绝特朗普。只有希拉里能满足他们战乱和毁灭的欲望！

-------------译者：liudingxun-审核者：liudingxun------------

dagger906
Strange as it sounds there's more chance of WWIII happening under Hillary who along with Obama initiated the "pivot to Asia" policy that moves US military hardware away from Middle East/ISIS theater to Chinese theater.
In the end ISIS has no chance of actually fighting a WWIII with US but every stray shot along Chinese shores can start it. Trump's vow to withdraw military from China's front door do more to prevent the possibility of nuclear holocaust than Obama's Nobel Peace Prize. His intended purpose of saving money is an added benefit.
Hillary on the other hands intends to escalate the arms race with the only country that can both serve as a justification for it and is capable of it (it's not ISIS) to placate the military industrial complex as any shrewd politician would do.

奥巴马的重返亚太战略，让美国的军事力量离开了中东和ISIS大本营，转向了中国；如果希拉里延续这一政策，第三次世界大战有可能会爆发！
和ISIS作战不是第三次世界大战，相反，沿着中国的海岸线游荡、瞄准会触发三战！
特朗普发誓要把围堵中国的军事力量撤出以防止可能的核战毁灭，这比奥巴马更应该获得诺贝尔和平奖。特朗普省钱（撤军）的目的是为了增加收益。
希拉里却相反，准备和中国升级军备竞赛，这（这不是ISIS）就可以安抚军工复合体，这是任何狡猾的政客都会做的。

-------------译者：liudingxun-审核者：liudingxun------------

William Pitt
It is wishful thinking the GOP is changing its agenda on China. It's all in the rhetoric. The GOP has always been backed by big business. Big business has trillions invested in China. When China doesn't get what it wants in the world it will squeeze big business. Then big business will squeeze the GOP. Then the GOP will give whatever China wants.
The Dems are also in bed with business too. Witness Bill Clinton backed big business by embracing GOP idea and brain child NAFTA. NAFTA was started by Reagan. Embraced and pushed forward by Bush Sr. Signed by Bill Clinton. NAFTA has virtually destroyed millions of good paying American jobs putting millions of Americans out of work. When it comes down to American values or China big business will always back China. American values like freedom human rights and other tangible ideals are only good if they're free. And nothing is free.

认为共和党改变了对中国的议程是一厢情愿的。这是巧言令色！共和党的后台是大企业，而大企业在中国拥有数万亿的投资。当中国在全球事务中得不到他想要的东西的时候，他们就会向美国的大企业施压；然后美国大企业就会向共和党施压。那么，共和党就会满足中国想要的任何东西。
在贸易上，民主党还在睡觉。民主党和大企业也是一路的。支持大企业的克林顿赞成共和党的理念并支持《北美自由贸易协议》的构想。北美自贸协定是由里根时代开始的，老布什推动的，克林顿签署的！北美自由贸易协定实际上摧毁了美国百万计的高薪职位，造成了数百万的失业。是选择美国价值观还是选择中国，大企业总是选择后者。如果美国人的价值观，像是自由、人权或者其他什么东西是免费的话，那么这些理念就是最好的，但是没有什么是免费的。

-------------译者：liudingxun-审核者：liudingxun------------

Garry Doolittle
I don't doubt that what you're saying is true and more. My point was a geopolitical one: The expanding Empire of Japan vs the expanding Empire of China. Political and commercial partners/dependencies of Western powers will see their expenses rise with "Yuan Imperialism" just as we saw our relative costs increase with "Yen Imperialism." The Chinese are using the same prism of history to view their role in the South China Sea (and the East China Sea) as did Japan while seeking to exact the same economic toll on the West through dominance of the region.

我毫不怀疑你所说的是真实的。我有一个地缘政治观点：日本帝国扩张 VS 中华帝国扩张。西方的政治和商业伙伴或者依赖者们，在人民币帝国主义下，将会看到他们的开支增长；就像在日元帝国主义下，我们曾经看到我们的相对成本增长。就像日本过去所做的那样，中国现在用相同的历史观来审视他们在南海和东海的地位，同时希望通过主导该地区来向西方施加同样的经济影响。

-------------译者：lovexq-审核者：liudingxun------------

Odinsson
I agree. Japan was a brutal state - killing and inflicting a lot of pains and sufferings to millions of people in Asia. But that was a long time ago. Japan has moved on to join the world community and become a civilized country.
Now China is embracing this brutal past of Japan. They are destroying millions of lives and livelihoods. They are wiping out cultures in Tibet and Xinjiang. China is not the only country with a brutal past. The difference between China and the rest of the civilized world is people learned from their past so they try to make their futures better. China on the other hand is going backward in time.
Odinsson

我同意。日本是一个残忍的国家-在亚洲杀害成千上百万的人，制造了许多的痛苦和灾难。但那已经过去很久了，现在日本已经加入了国际社会，成为了一个文明国家。
现在中国正在拥抱过去那个残忍的日本。他们正在破坏上百万人的生命和生活。他们正在彻底摧毁新疆和西藏的文化。中国不是唯一一个拥有残忍过去的国家。中国与剩下的文明世界的不同之处在于其他国家的人们从历史中吸取教训。文明世界的人民尽力使他们的未来变得更好，而中国却相反，他们越走越回头。

-------------译者：liudingxun-审核者：liudingxun------------

longlance
The mighty Dragon is ascendant. Chinese people are clever industrious and adventurous. There is no stopping China. GOP had better board the train or get off the track.

强悍的巨龙生生不息。中国人民聪明、勤劳、勇敢。中国不会停下脚步。共和党最好还是搭上（中国高速发展的）列车，或者离开轨道（放弃参选）。

-------------译者：lovexq-审核者：liudingxun------------

Bankotsu
GOP seems to have a more realistic and business like view of China I look forward to a GOP regime working hand in hand with China.
Democratic party is too ideological towards China it means trouble.
I support GOP in this elections and hope that GOP regime and China can improve their relations.

共和党对中国似乎有一个更加现实的和商业化的观点。我期望一个共和党的政权能够和中国携手合作。民主党对待中国的态度太过于意识形态了，这意味着麻烦。
在这次选举中，我支持共和党，并且希望共和党政权和中国能够改善双方的关系。