可导致俄军队在战争中失败的两个因素 [美国媒体]

Here are 2 problems that could sink theRussian military in a war

可导致俄军队在战争中失败的两个因素



With a frozen frontline insideUkrainian territory, the successful annexation of Crimea, and an ongoingintervention in Syria, Russia's military prowess appears firmly established.

在乌克兰领土内确立了前线，成功的吞并了克里米亚，并不断的介入叙利亚战争，所以貌似俄罗斯的军事力量相当的稳固。

But despite the Kremlin'srecent successes, the Russian military faces two deep structuralproblems that could prove disastrous if it ever faced off against another largeconventional force.

但是尽管俄罗斯最近取得了一系列的成功，俄罗斯军队面临着两个严重的结构性问题，一旦与另外一个大型的传统力量对抗的话，这两个问题可使得俄罗斯陷入灾难的境地。

According to Dave Majumdar of The National Interest,Russia's military is facing deep manpower and hardware shortfalls.

根据《国家利益》杂志的DaveMajumdar说法，俄罗斯面临的两个问题是人员和硬件上的不足。

Conscription is a big part of Russia'smilitary shortfall. A vast majority of military personnel, outside of theStrategic Missile Forces, airborne forces, and naval infantry, still rely onunmotivated conscripts who receive little training.

征兵制度是俄罗斯军人缺口的重要组成部分。除了战略导弹部队，空降部队和海军步兵外，俄罗斯军人的大部分还主要依赖毫无斗志、缺乏训练的应征士兵。

The second major problem facing the Russianmilitary is the state of its hardware and its faltering procurement process.Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia lost a good portion of itsindustrial and technological base, something that weakened the country'sdefense industry.

俄罗斯军队面临的第二个主要问题是硬件设施落后、采购流程停滞不前。在苏联解体后，俄罗斯失去了很多的工业和技术基地，这削弱了俄罗斯的国防工业。

Mr.Springfield 1 day ago 9 49
The last time the Russians had motivationto to fight was WWII because the Germans were on their homeland.Even in WWI theRussians had a hard time fighting the Germans in their territories occupied bythem like Poland and adjoining Baltic regions.Not to disrespect a RussianSoldier's ability to fight.They have been brutal and unrelenting to theirenemies they have fought,I have respect to that.True only that their eliteunits are very good!I have most profound respect to their Airborne Forces,theParatroopers because i was a Paratrooper in the US Army once upon a time.Theseare Russia's best men along with their Spetznaz Operators who come from theirParatroopers also.Their Infantry sucks because my former Russian Paratrooperfreinds here in the US told me so...

俄罗斯人最后一次拥有作战动机的时候是在二战，因为德国人已经来到了家门口。即使在一战的时候，俄罗斯人也没有什么动力和德国人在波兰或者附近的波罗的海地区作战。这并不是不尊重俄罗斯士兵的作战能力。从历史上可知俄罗斯士兵对敌人是无情和残忍的，我对此身怀敬意。是的，只有他们的精英部队才是非常厉害的！我对他们的空降兵最为尊重，因为以前我在美军中当过空降兵。和俄罗斯特种部队一样，俄罗斯空降兵是俄军中最棒的，而俄罗斯的特种部队也来自空降兵。而他们的步兵很糟糕，因为在美国的这些前俄罗斯空降兵朋友们这么对我说的。

Erik 1 day ago 28 23
we just saw last week how they firedconventional balistic missiles reaching 1500km from the small ships what meansmany levels up compared to 1990 - reach 300km and someone here writes they havehardware shortfalls. i think whatever artist has written this article i am surehe has shortfall of whatever

上周我们看到俄罗斯从小型舰艇上发射传统弹道导弹到1500公里处，和1990年相比真是高了好几个级别——当时只有300公里，可是却有人认为他们在硬件上存在不足。不论写这篇文章的是什么人，我可以肯定的是这名作者本身就存在不足。

Mark 1 day ago 9 28
The experience of WWII has showed Russianare capable of winning a war by sending untrained men into combat but at a costof brutal casualties that killed a majority of healthiest, best men availableat the time. The Germans killed 10 Russians for every German soldier killed incombat.
All kinds of expedient solutions werefound. Russians couldn't train their soldiers in rifle marksmanship due toinsufficient time, so everybody was issued sub-machine guns firing at 1100rounds per minute. The soldier just had to point the weapon in the generaldirection of the enemy and squeeze the trigger until all ammo was gone. Theferocious fusillade suppressed the Germans even though it couldn't hitanything.

二战表明有能力通过派遣未经训练的战士进入战场而赢得战争，当然要付出巨大的伤亡代价。在那场战争中，俄德两国的死亡比例是10：1。
当时俄国采取了所有的权宜之计。由于时间紧迫，当时俄国无法给自己的军人提供步枪训练。所以每个士兵都得到了每分钟1100环的机关枪。俄罗斯士兵需要做的就只是武器瞄准敌人的大概方向，然后扣下扳机一阵猛射，直到子弹打光。这样的猛烈射击镇住了德国人，尽管没能打中任何东西。

ai 1 day ago 9 12
Jeremy, once upon a time Russia was alandlocked country the size of Texas. Look at the map of Russia now. How did ithappen? A bunch of termites got together and built it? Or they had to fightwith everyone around it to make it what it is? A country doesn't become anempire without a superior army and brilliant generals. And they have over 800years of warfare to show for. On the other hand, who did US fight? Mexico,Korea, Vietnam? Couldn't even beat Japan, that was fighting Soviets in anotherfront by the way, by the means of conventional weapons. I think you need toquestion the motivation of American soldiers, if they're wiling to fight a longbrutal war to the death for the paper in their pockets. Russians have beentested. Americans, not so much.

很久以前俄罗斯还是个内陆国家，面积只有得克萨斯州那么大。再看看如今的俄罗斯地图，为什么会这样？一群白蚁聚集在一起从而建立了现在的俄罗斯？还是说他们得和周边的人作斗争才换来了如今的俄罗斯？如果没有强大的军队和聪明的将军，一个国家是无法成为帝国的。而且俄罗斯拥有800年的战争史。另一方面，美国和哪些国家打仗了？墨西哥，朝鲜，越南？甚至无法通过传统武器打败日本，顺便提一下，当时的日本在另一条战线上还同苏联对抗。我认为你应该质问美国士兵的斗志，看看他们是否愿意为了口袋里的那张纸而战斗到死。俄罗斯人已经经受了测试。而美国人还没有。

Van Fleet 1 day ago 5 7
had hitler given his generals a free handin Russia, then the Wehrmacht would've bled the red army white and a negotiatedpeace would've been the outcome.

如果希特勒让他的将军们在俄罗斯放手去干，那么德军将把红军打得一败涂地，最后的和平将通过协商达成。

Octavius 18 hours ago 7 11
The same exact articles were written aboutthe Russian military in 1941, leading Hitler to attack it , and leading #$%$Germany to think it could close out a war with Russia in 3-5 months.
We know the reality.
The weaponry, technology, and training arenot a major focus for Russia.
They're more than willing and able to tradeblood for space.
In the meanwhile, the weaponry we're seeingis a wide spectrum view, with old being used to withhold using the new andprevent an enemy from getting a clear view of Russia's true strength.
The Russian is a cunning fighter anddoesn't cater to conventional methods of war as was witnessed in 1941 through1945.
To see Russian true miltary power, one isforced to attack it.

1941年人们就俄罗斯军队的问题也写过同样的文章，导致希特勒对俄罗斯发起攻击，也让德国以为自己可以在3到5个月时间里将俄国打败。
后来的结果我们都知道了。
对于俄罗斯来说，武器，技术和训练都不是重点。
他们更加愿意也更有能力通过流血来换取土地。
同时，我们现在所看到的俄罗斯武器是一种幻象，俄罗斯利用老武器来隐瞒他们对新武器的使用，从而让敌人无法看清俄罗斯的真正实力。
俄罗斯人是狡猾的战士，而且并不买传统战争方法的账，这可以从1941-45年的战争中看出来。
要想看清俄罗斯的真正军事实力，就只能对其发动攻击。

billy 1 day ago 4 37
Why all this baloney about WAR? Nobody winsthe next one.

为什么出现这么多有关战争的胡言乱语？下一场战争中没人是赢家。

Steven 1 day ago 12 9
The Russians would fare far better in a warthan would America, but mostly for financial reasons. The U.S. is 18 trillionin debt and its global influence is waning. Any attempt for the U.S. to wage awar would immediately collapse the dollar, as most are aware that the foolhardypursuit of toppling sandbox regimes not only made those countries far morehostile to the U.S. it also drove the debt to 18 trillion, which is on currentprojections to be 21 trillion in 2019. this debt is insurmountable, and anyattempt to wage another war would collapse the dollar. Russia is not 18 trillionin debt and would be able to better able to fund a war than the U.S.

一旦发生战争，俄罗斯的情况会比美国好，主要是出在经济原因上。美国欠债18万亿而且全球影响力正在下降。如果美国发动战争，美元马上崩溃，因为美国总是想推翻其他国家的政权，导致这些国家对美国的敌意更甚，也导致美国的债务达到了18万亿，到2019年可能会达到21万亿。这么巨大的债务美国是无法偿清的，如果美国想挑起另外一场战争，美元立马就会崩溃。而俄罗斯没有那么多债务，所以比起美国，俄罗斯更有能力投资战争。