美国空军正在研发一种新的轰炸机,将确保美国在现代战争中的优势。种新一代的长程轰炸机的研发工作最近被赋予诺思罗普公司,它将结合和充分利用现有的先进隐形技术,集成软件,武器和对抗措施。
This newhigh-tech bomber is designed to keep China and Russia at bay
这种新的高科技轰炸机将让中国和俄罗斯陷入困境
The U.S.Air Force is developing a new bomber that promises to secure the U.S. advantagein modern warfare.
美国空军正在研发一种新的轰炸机,将确保美国在现代战争中的优势。
Thenext-generation long-range strike bomber, recently awarded to Northrop GrummanCorp. NOC, +4.36% fordevelopment, will not be designed to rely on as yet undeveloped technologies,as is so often the case with new aircraft and weaponry. Instead, the aircraftwill combine and fully exploit existing advanced stealth technology, integratedsoftware, ordnance and countermeasures.
这种新一代的长程轰炸机的研发工作最近被赋予诺思罗普公司,一般的新飞机和新武器在设计时都会依赖未充分开发的技术,而这种新的轰炸机在设计上将不这么做。相反,它将结合和充分利用现有的先进隐形技术,集成软件,武器和对抗措施。
LarryRiley 37 minutes ago
This newbomber is intended to continue to drive this country into bankruptcy as is therest of the black hole known as the military budget. It is doing itsjob well.
这种新武器的目的是继续让这个国家陷入破产,就像剩余的军事预算黑洞一样侵蚀着美国。
StewHannaford 47 minutes ago
We'vereally not advanced much from our cavemen ancestors who chucked spears at eachother. We just have a bit more advancedways to attempt to protect us from our fears. The problem is we forget the best way to stay safe is to be a justsociety.
So whywe're spending trillions of dollars on this and at the same time taking moneyaway from the poor and education, while giving tax breaks to the wealthy andcorporations, we need to be very aware that our country will not fall apartfrom any cause these planes can defend us from. We'll fall apart from a slow steady decay from within. Start spending some money fixing our realthreats while you can.
我们的洞穴人祖先利用长矛相互杀戮,而我们其实并不比他们先进多少。我们只是拥有了更先进的方式来保护我们免遭恐惧的伤害。问题在于我们忘记了我们获得安全的最好方法是形成一个公平的社会。
所以我们为什么要花那么多钱在武器上,与此同时又从穷人和教育那里抢钱呢,还给富人和企业减免税金,我么应该清醒的意识到外部的任何攻击都不会让我们这个国家瓦解,真正让我们瓦解的是内部问题的渐渐恶化。所以在我们还有能力的时候,花点钱解决我们真正的威胁吧。
FredMensing 1 hour ago
everythingis made in China , they will make the bomber parts too.
所有东西都是中国制造,他们也将制造这种轰炸机的部件。
RonColeman 1 hour ago
And sixmonths after development, the Russians and Chinese will announce a similarcapability.
然后在研发了6个月后,俄罗斯和中国将宣布拥有类似的能力。
quasimodotrahana 1 hour ago
thewicked corrupt evil russian know how to Jam Satellite signals . they are doingnow with Ukriane/Gerogia for US has No idea about the russian movenemts justlike inivasion of Crimea,Ukriane and Georgia.
the EVILisreali will help the wicked corrupt EVIL russian get data and blueprints onthe bomber like always.
the EVIlisreali are always Spying and Hacking the USAalong with wicked corrupt EVILrussia but don't tell the Fake fbI theywill always say its the Chinese
腐败邪恶的俄罗斯人知道如何阻拦卫星信号。俄罗斯人现在正通过这种方式对付乌克兰和格鲁吉亚,而美国根本不知道俄罗斯在干嘛,就好比不知道俄罗斯是如何侵略克里米亚,乌克兰和格鲁吉亚的。
邪恶的以色列人会帮助俄罗斯人获得这款轰炸机的数据和蓝图,就像往常一样。
邪恶的以色列人经常和腐败邪恶的俄罗斯人一道监视和入侵美国,但是不要对骗子FBI这么说,因为他们始终认为那是中国人干的。
j l 1hour ago
VOTETRUMP TO FIX THESE PROBLEMS!!!
投票给特朗普,让他来解决这些问题!!!
RichGrace 3 hours ago
Well, itsounds like a sensible plan, but this article comes close to being an anodynepropaganda piece for the military-industrial complex. I don't recall MW beingcritical of the clusterfrack that is the F-35 program, by far the mostexpensive and ineffective next-gen fighter project in history. Time will tell.These defense industry guys need to spend their taxpayer dollars wisely. Theysure didn't with the F-35.
听起来像是个很好的计划,但是这篇文章感觉就是在给军工企业做宣传。本站貌似都没有批评过F35战机项目,这可是史上最昂贵最没用的新型战机了。时间会告诉我们一切。这些国防产业里的人应该把纳税人的钱花的更加明智。F-35就是个失败之作。
PatrickHouse 3 hours ago
@RichGrace you are right. Even early forms ofradar can detect theses things. These people are liar ready to waste your taxdollars. Look at the F-35 or the F-21.Again the military industrial complex isout to fleece the tax payer. We just fought two wars and 3 trillion. What awaste. Now the F-35 is going to cost one trillion. Spend our money efficientlyor is that word in your vocabulary.
楼上说得对,即使是早期的雷达都可以探测到这种战机。这些人就是骗子,浪费纳税人的钱。看看F35或者F21。军工企业再次欺骗了纳税人。我们刚刚打了两场战争,花了3万亿美元。真是浪费。现在F-35又要花费1万亿。
Brad Kort3 hours ago
This willonly work if the technologies can be kept secret. An unlikely proposition in today's securityenvironment. Virtually all DoD networkshave been hacked by the Chinese. Expectto see a clone bomber 5 years after the first US one flies. Unless the government of the US starts totake Chinese electronic attacks on the US with the seriousness they deserve,the US advantage will be whittled away in a couple decades.
只有技术不外泄的情况下,这种轰炸机才有用。而在今天的安全环境里,这是不可能的命题。美国国防部的几乎所有网络都被中国黑客入侵。在美国轰炸机首飞后,5年后中国就会把这种美国轰炸机克隆出来。除非美国政府严肃对待中国对美国的电子攻击,否则几十年后美国的优势将变小。
GerardLex 3 hours ago
@BradKort You must have read my mind! Of course, it will help it we have a presidentwho has the interest of the American people at heart!
楼上说得对!如果我们的总统将美国人民的利益放在心里,那就好了!
EricAllen 1 hour ago
@GerardLex @Brad Kort Yes, as we certainly donow. As much as I've disagreed with thepolicies and opinions of many Presidents of the last 50 years, I've neverdoubted the good intentions and patriotism of any of them.
过去50年来,尽管我不赞同很多美国总统的政策和观点,但是我从不怀疑他们的良好意愿和爱国之心。
RichGrace 3 hours ago
@BradKort Show me evidence that they're not taking it seriously.
你说说看美国政府怎么就没有认真对待来自中国的电子攻击了,有证据吗?
EricAllen 1 hour ago
@BradKort Yes, keeping our costly militaryand engineering research (costly in both money and calendar time) secure fromChinese hacking seems to be an extraordinarily important issue. It looks to me like they copied the F35 and, bydropping the VTOL fan from the design and adding a second engine, made theaircraft much, much better. We certainlycan't afford to spend that kind of time and money, to hand our adversaries aterrific weapon, while we equip our service members with a lesser one.
是啊,一定要保护好我们昂贵的军事和工程研究,不能被中国黑客窃取,这是非常重要的。在我看来他们确实是抄袭了F35,但是他们放弃了垂直起降风扇并添加了第二个引擎,所以我认为他们的复制品比F35好多了。我们怎么能在花了那么多时间和金钱后却让我们的敌人获得了相关技术呢,而且他们的复制品比我们原版的还好,这实在让我们无法承受。
Marc Mueller3 hours ago
Modifythe Navy Poseidon Boeing 737 into a bomber and then buy large numbers.
将海军的波塞冬波音737改造成轰炸机,然后大量购买。
我们致力于传递世界各地老百姓最真实、最直接、最详尽的对中国的看法
【版权与免责声明】如发现内容存在版权问题,烦请提供相关信息发邮件,
我们将及时沟通与处理。本站内容除非来源注明五毛网,否则均为网友转载,涉及言论、版权与本站无关。
本文仅代表作者观点,不代表本站立场。
本文来自网络,如有侵权及时联系本网站。
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...