美国网友:一些人对这件事的看法和40年代初美国军队面对日本军事进步的反应十分相似。就好像当年飞虎队的谢诺尔特,把缴获的日本零式飞机上的制作图纸带回美国,却被美国政府告知“用这些图纸上的数据是不可能造出这架零式飞机”。你们贬低、嘲笑中国人,后果很严重......
Is This Chinese Navy Ship Equipped With An Experimental Electromagnetic Railgun?
这是一艘装备了电磁轨道炮的中国海军军舰吗?
Nickname Yours
>>Don't worry people! I'm a Chinese.I can tell you that all those railgun and stealth fighter are just mock up.fake stuff. They can't either fly or will fall apart in the first shoot. I livein China, I know they are faking this to scare western people. Everything inChina is fake. The officials crane up the stealth fighter with a wire and takethe photo. China is poor and about 20 years behind India, basically same asAfrica. I can assure you that there is nothing to worry about. everyone can relaxnow.
大家不用担心!我是中国人。我跟你讲,这些电磁轨道炮和隐形战斗机都只是模型而已。是假货。它们要么飞不了,要么第一次发射就会散架。我住在中国,我知道他们伪造这个东西吓唬西方人。中国的一切事物都是假的。官员们用铁丝把隐形战斗机吊起来,然后拍照片。中国穷,落后印度20年左右,基本上和非洲一样。我可以向你们保证,没什么可担心的。大家现在可以放松了。
FoolyouAgency 回复 Nickname Yours
You work well, SN10688 fool-you agencyof China.
Go to get a reward.
干得好,忽悠局里代号为SN10688的同志,去拿年终奖吧!
Moonbat74
>>We live in interesting times.
我们生活在一个有趣的时代。
BoonDockerSaint
>>A US POV looking at China:
“Lookat this on this ship… Is this a railgun?”
“I don’t know, could be. Too much we don’t know.”
“If it is, what are they doing to power it?”
“I don’t know. They have containers on the deck, might be a clue.”
“How advanced is their program?”
“Accuracy?”
“I don’t know.”
“Range?”
“I don’t know.” etc…
From Chinese POV looking at US:
“The Americans have rail gun! BAE manufacture! They firing it in Virginia! Power is 30MJ! The shell is 11kg! The shell travel at 2.5km/sec! It has expected accuracyrange more than 50km! It has autoloader!”
“How do you know?”
“Google.Time magazine and ONR bulletin.Videos on Youtube!”
从美国的视角看中国
长官:“看看这艘船上的那玩意儿,这是一个电磁炮吗?”
下属:“我。。。我不知道,也许是吧。。。我们掌握的资料很少。”
长官:“如果真的是,那中国人用什么给大炮供电?”
下属:“我不知道,他们的甲板上有一些集装箱,也许这是一个线索。”
长官:“中国人的计划有多先进?”
下属:“不知道。"
长官:“他们炮打得准吗?”
下属:“不知道。"
长官:“他们炮射程多远?”
下属:“不知道。"
从中国的视角看美国
下属:“美国人有电磁炮啦!BAE公司制造!他们在美国维吉尼亚州测试火力!炮弹能量是30兆焦耳!炮弹重11千克!炮弹飞行速度是2.5KM/S!它预期的精度范围超过50公里!它是自动装弹的!”
长官:“你咋知道?”
下属:“谷歌搜索、美国时代杂志和ONR bulletin,还有YouTube视频。”
TheWestCoast
>>Anyone with way more knowledge than me about this kind of thing care to speculate what that big thing stuck on the front of the ship does to the seaworthiness of the vessel?
It all looks very top-heavy.
有没有知识渊博的人观察到这艘船前面部分的大家伙对船体的适航性的影响?它看起来太头重脚轻了。
Someone from CN
>>HD close up of the turret
炮塔的高清近照
Machiavelli 回复 Someonefrom CN
>>Well, that provides some betterscale. Thatthing is way bigger than any powder and projectile gun needs to be unless they're firing Daihatsu's out of it. Looks like the barrel is at least equal to the height of the hand rail.
嗯,这张图片提供了有关大炮的比例。这个大炮比任何一个火炮还要大得多,除非这个火炮是用来发射Daihatsu汽车一样大小的东西。看起来炮管的口径至少和船上的扶手高度相当
SamuilGuhonter
>>I'm really curious when exactly the world will consider China the No.1 Superpower,all things considered. Their rate of improvement in so many fields is quite impressive.
我很好奇什么时候世界会认为中国在各个方面都是世界第一的超级力量,他们在许多领域进步的速度十分令人深刻。
JP Mason 回复 Samuil Guhonter
>>The answer is when they control access to the global commons.
答案就是:当中国人控制了全人类的时候。
Guest 回复 SamuilGuhonter
>> At some point after they stop copying/stealing other country's designs and create their own.
当他们停止复制/窃取其他国家的设计并创造他们自己的东西时候。
OL 回复 Guest
>> Which, given the lack of any kind of working railgun on any shipin any navy in the world, would be now.
鉴于目前世界上没有其它任何一种电磁炮安装在其他海军舰船上,那么就是现在。(中国在各个方面都是世界第一的超级力量)
harpax
>>The reaction of some people on this is very similar tothe reaction of the US in the early 40s in the face of Japanese advancements. Ithink it was Chennault (of the flying tigers) that brought the manufacturer'splate from a captured Zero or Nate back to the US only to be told that "Itis impossible to build a plane with these stats".
You belittle and deride the Chinese at your peril.
Everyone starts by copying someone else. The Sovietsstarted with the Christie tanks and within 20 years they had T-34s.
It made no difference to the Germans where the designcame from, as it made no difference to the early US pilots being shot down byZeros.
Also, from what I understand the Chinese already have experience with similar disciplines (maglev trains etc).
一些人对这件事的看法和40年代初美国军队面对日本军事进步的反应十分相似。就好像当年飞虎队的谢诺尔特,把缴获的日本零式飞机上的制作图纸带回美国,却被美国政府告知“用这些图纸上的数据是不可能造出这架零式飞机”。
你们贬低、嘲笑中国人,后果很严重。
每个人一开始都是模仿别人的设计,苏联军队的坦克一开始仿制美国一战后的克里斯蒂坦克,可不到20年他们有了T-34坦克。
设计来自哪国并不会影响德国人(的进攻),也不会影响美国空军被日本零式飞机击落(的数量)。
此外,据我了解,中国人已经有过类似工程经验(磁悬浮列车)。
ARCNA442 回复 harpax
>>To be fair, it was impossible to for the Japanese tobuild a plane with those characteristics if they had used normal safety anddurability margins. America knew that Japan's aircraft engines were severelyunderpowered (up to 30% less power than comparable American engines) so thedescribed performance didn't make sense. It wasn't until we captured a Zero anddiscovered just how lightly it was built that we realized what the Japanese haddone. Thus, the traditional story about hubris and underestimating an enemy isjust wrong as America had correctly judged Japan's industrial capabilities- it was actually a case of misinterpretingintelligence by not understanding the enemy's mindset (which is actually a farmore important lesson to understand).
公平地说,如果日本人以安全性和耐用性为标准,是不可能用图纸上的数据来建造一架飞机。美国知道日本飞机的引擎动力严重不足(动力要比同类的美国飞机少30%),因此美国军方认为所描述的日本飞机的性能是不可能的。直到我们缴获了一架零式飞机,发现它是多么的轻巧,我们才意识到日本人是如何做到这样的性能。因此,这样一个傲慢和轻视敌人的往事,和美国当年自认为已经能估计日本工业的生产能力一样错误。这实际上是一个因为不了解敌人,反而认为提供的情报是不可靠的例子。(这实际上给我们一个大大的教训)
我们致力于传递世界各地老百姓最真实、最直接、最详尽的对中国的看法
【版权与免责声明】如发现内容存在版权问题,烦请提供相关信息发邮件,
我们将及时沟通与处理。本站内容除非来源注明五毛网,否则均为网友转载,涉及言论、版权与本站无关。
本文仅代表作者观点,不代表本站立场。
本文来自网络,如有侵权及时联系本网站。
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...
Why do most people who have a positive view of China have been to ...