中美俄都具备多种手段让对方的探测系统致盲 [美国媒体]

Russian, Chinese and American military can attack eachothers satellites, AWACS and refueling to claw out their opponentstechnological eyes

俄罗斯、中国及美国都有能力攻击对方的卫星、预警系统、加油机，让对方的探测系统致盲

A new generation of Russian and Chinese-builtlong-range air-to-air missiles could threaten the critical nodes that enableU.S. air operations. Those nodesinclude the AWACS, various intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR)assets, aerial refueling tankers and electronic attack aircraft.

新一代的俄罗斯及中国制远程空对空导弹有能力威胁美国空中行动的关键节点。这些节点包括预警系统、各种情报、监视及侦查(ISR)设施，空中加油机及电子战军机。

Long-range air intercept weapons—coupled withthe right fighter could disrupt the ability of the United States to conductsustained air operations in both the Asia-Pacific and the European theaters.Essentially, Russians and/or Chinese forces could pair long-range air-to-airmissiles with aircraft like the Mikoyan MiG-31 Foxhound, Sukhoi T-50 PAK-FA andthe Chengdu J-20 to attack American AWACS, JTARS and aerial refueling tankerslike the Boeing KC-135 or forthcoming KC-46 Pegasus. Especially over the vastreaches of the Pacific where airfields are few and far between, lumberingaerial refueling tankers could be an Achilles’ Heel that Beijing could chose toexploit.

远程空中拦截武器配备合适的战机可以瓦解美国在亚太及欧洲战区持续执行空中任务的能力。也就是说，俄罗斯、中国合伙或单独可以为米格31或者苏霍伊T-50和成飞的J-20配备远程空空导弹，攻击美国的预警系统、联合战术监视及侦查系统、空中加油机如波音的KC-135或者即将服役的KC-46飞马座。尤其是在广袤的太平洋地区，机场数量稀少、距离遥远，笨重缓慢的加油机将会是北京不会放过的软肋。

China and Russia also have the ability todisable Global positioning satellites (GPS) and intelligence satellites.

中国和俄罗斯都有能力破坏全球定位卫星系统(GPS)及情报卫星。

The United States also has the ability to takeout the same systems on the Chinese and Russian side.

美国也有同样的能力。

This would bring both sides down from 21stprecision warfare to something closer to 1970s era air to air combat.

这样一来将会使双方从21世纪的精确武器系统带回到1970年代的空空格斗模式。





An airborne early warning and control (AEW andC) system is an airborne radar picket system designed to detect aircraft, shipsand vehicles at long rangesand perform command and control of the battlespace in an air engagement bydirecting fighter and attack aircraft strikes.

空中早期预警和管制系统（AEW和C系统）是一种机载雷达监视系统，用于远程搜索飞机、舰船和车辆，用于在空中交战中指引战机和攻击机攻击的战场指挥和控制。

Modern AEW and C systems can detect aircraftfrom up to 400 km (220 nmi) away, well out of range of most surface-to-airmissiles. One AEW and C aircraft flying at 9,000 m (30,000 ft) can cover anarea of 312,000 square kilometers (120,000 sq mi). Three such aircraft inoverlapping orbits can cover the whole of Central Europe

现代的AEW和C系统可以在大多数的地空导弹射程外的，搜索400公里（220海里）范围内的飞机。一架预警机在9000米高空可以覆盖31.2万平方公里（12万平方英里）的区域。3架这样的预警机就可以覆盖整个中欧。

Refueling planes are needed to extend theoperating range of fighters and bombers. This enables aircraft carriers to stayout at safer ranges.

加油机用于延伸战机及轰炸机的任务距离。这样可以使航母置身于安全距离之外。

GPS is needed for precision targeting ofweapons. Precision targeting enables fewer missiles or weapons to be used toaccomplish the same mission.

GPS用于精确制导武器。这样可以节省完成同样任务所需的导弹和武器。

Vietnam era combat did not have many of thesesystems.

越战时期这样的系统不多。

SOURCES- National Interest, Free Beacon,wikipedia

来源：国家利益、自由灯塔、维基百科


ScottGriswoldVisitor
1hour ago
The people who work at the Pentagon ought to consult thecomment sections on yahoo before they make decisions in regard to technologyand weapon development. They could save a lot of time and money by runningthings by the on line experts. The same holds for military strategy andprocurement. All the best generals are on Yahoo

五角大楼应该在作出技术及武器研发决定前咨询一下雅虎的评论区。这样一来依靠这些网上砖家可以大为节省时间和金钱。至于军事策略和军备采购同样适用。最好的将军都在雅虎。

The PowerThinker
2hours ago
I guess no one here has ever heard of inertial guidancesystems. These are quite advanced now and are viable backups to GPS. There isalso old fashioned radio location and navigation. It is also important tounderstand that GPS does not cover then entire globe. US already is quiteprepared for GPS outage situation and trains for and conducts exercises forthat scenario. This is no problem for us whatsoever. The AWACS and refuelervulnerabilities I cannot speak to though.

我猜混这里的各位都没听说过惯导系统。现在的惯导系统非常先进，是GPS的重要备用系统。还有老式的无线电定位和导航系统。必须要了解的是，GPS并不能覆盖全球。美国对于GPS系统失效早已是有充分准备，多次做过应对演习。对我们来说完全不是问题。预警与加油系统的脆弱性我没法评论。

F111FExpert
4hours ago
I think the author needs to re-research what capabilitieswere being used in Vietnam... Though primitive by today's systems, there wereairborne command and control, ISR, and even laser-guided munitions (PAVE Sword,Paveway-I, etc.) I think some of the KC-135 air to air refuelers are stillflying, too, though they may all be upgraded to the R model by now...

我认为 作者应该重新研究一下越战。。。我们那时的系统可能相对现在而言比较原始，但是当时已经有了空中指挥和管制、情报监视及侦查系统、甚至还有激光制导武器（铺路剑、宝石路-I型等），有些那个年代的KC-135加油机可能还在服役中，也许都已经升级到了R型。

danshooitomMember
4hours ago
We in China are just trying to defend ourselves. We are a3rd world country and unlike
the US and Russiawe do not have Jewish nor German talents. You two go fight it out.

我们中国只是想要保护自己。我们是第三世界国家，不像美国和俄罗斯，我们没有犹太人和德国人的天赋。你们俩打去吧。

The PowerThinker
in reply to
danshooitom
fWe in China are just trying to...more »
2hours ago
Really? What has US done to threaten china other thenfurrow our brows at human rights violations? China and US are so economicallyentwined that neither dare start a conflict with the other because it wouldensure mutual ruin. China is has become a world economic power and for somereason is now wanting to become a world military power. Either the claim byChina that this is to combat existential threats is a smoke screen for theirtrue intentions or they're stupid, or they're psychotically paranoid...and idefinitely don't think they're stupid. My bet is on an internal militaryindustrial complex that is pulling the strings from behind the scenes buylining the pockets of key figures just like what has happened/is happening inthe US and Russia. Greed and weakness of character among politicians is notjust a US thing, it is a universal human thing and to thing that China or anyother country's politicians are immune to it is folly.

是吗？我们除了指责侵犯人权以外，还有什么能威胁中国的？中国和美国经济上互相依赖的如此之深，没有一方有胆量挑起彼此之间几乎注定是两败俱伤的冲突。中国已经是世界经济大国，基于某些原因现在想要成为世界军事大国。中国号称要与现存的威胁战斗要不只是一种障眼法或者中国人很愚蠢，抑或者中国人有神经病式的妄想。我绝对不认同中国人是愚蠢的。也许只是内部的军火行业综合体幕后操纵，给大人物送钱，就像美国与俄罗斯以前和现在那样。政客的贪婪与人性的弱点不仅仅是美国才有，这个是人类共有的，不管中国还是其他国家都不能幸免。

danshooitomMember
in reply to
The Power
fReally? What has US done to t...more »
1hour ago
You have such way with words. Like I said: we are a 3rdworld country
trying to defendourselves.

你玩弄字眼真有一套。就像我说的：我们只是第三世界国家，只是想要保护自己。

Kushtrim'The Rapist' MaslinkaNewcomer
6hours ago
So Russia and China now have the same capabilities to damageterrorist Amerika as terrorist Amerika has to them
What of it ?
It's calledmutually-assured destruction.
Does terroristAmerika snivel because it can no longer bully and coerce ?

所以说俄罗斯和中国现在同样都有摧毁美帝恐怖主义的能力，就像美帝那样
那又怎样？
这就是所谓确保相互摧毁
美帝哭泣是因为不再能欺负和胁迫别人了吗？

anthropicNBF Elder
in reply to
Kushtrim 'TheRapist' Maslinka
fSo Russia and China now have t...more »
5hours ago
Luca, your hate verbal skills are a little rusty. It'sspelled "AmeriKKKa", remember?

Luca，你的口语有点烂，应该说“美弟弟”，记住了？

JamesExpert
in reply to
Kushtrim'The Rapist' Maslinka
fSo Russia and China now have t...more »
6hours ago
Sup Luca
tchernikResident Expert
9hours ago
They could also try to carpet bomb the White House forkilling the prez, which would have the same effect: proportional response andeventually, MAD.
Remember: trying to disrupt the enemy's activities over an area isdifferent from taking GPS down. That implies a whole other level ofconfrontation than just a frontier skirmish.
But if things come to that, I agree the US should be prepared and havebackup plans.

他们还可以地毯式轰炸白宫、杀死总统，这样等同于：对等报复，最终同归于尽。
记住：在一个地方破坏敌人的行动不等于破坏GPS。这个就不是小冲突而是另一个层次了。
如果事情发展到那个地步，我同意美国应该有应当的预案。