美版知乎：印度教育体系中哪些最令人失望和最不合逻辑

What are the most frustrating and illogical aspects of India's education system, right from kindergarten up to the Doctorate level?

从幼儿园到博士，印度教育体系中最令人失望，最不合逻辑的地方有哪些？

 

Quora读者的评论：

Balaji Viswanathan

When I was about 9 years old, I was in tears for scoring a 3rd rank in the class and not scoring a centum in mathematics. If I could go back in time, I would tell myself that none of that stuff ever mattered. I'm promising my infant son the same - I am never going to care what your marks/ranks are. Stop fighting stupid battles.

Our present system is designed for the industrial society. You learn canned stuff for 18 years and then apply that knowledge in the factory or accounting desk for the rest of your life. That system is no longer relevant.

The amount of new information we generate is so rapidly increasing that should stop giving information/knowledge to children. That is a waste of class time. Rather we should teach them tools to absorb, process and judge new information as they come.

In primary and secondary school:

The school I studied 8th-10th changed me a lot and I wish I had all my schooling there. The teachers there truly cared about education and I would build on top of the system they had:

当我大约9岁的时候，我因为在班里只得了个第三名，数学没有考到一百分大哭。如果我能回到过去，我会告诉自己这些都无关紧要。我也向我年幼的儿子保证——我永远不会在意你的分数/排名。别为这种蠢事纠结。

我们现在的制度是为工业社会设计的。你学了18年的罐头知识，然后在工厂或会计部门把这些知识运用到你的余生之中。这一体系已不再重要。

当今社会的新资讯不断涌现，我们不该给孩子们提供信息/知识了。那是浪费上课时间。相反，我们应该教他们工具来吸收、处理和判断新信息。

在小学和中学:

我8 -10年级就读的学校改变了我很多，我希望我的学校生活都是在那所学校度过。那里的老师真的很关心教育：

1.Debating should be the central element of schooling. I was not that good at it, but I enjoyed watching others do well. Even in the pre-Internet era, we debated CTBT, the Talibans, the Asian financial crisis, Vietnam war, Sun Yat Sen, Perry opening up Japan and so on. It was super fun and made history and other subjects lively.

2.Every year there was an annual week of projects, where there were a variety of stalls. One interesting place was a virtual stock market and we learned plenty of it. Financial education should be in the core curriculum. 

3.Poetry should have a bigger role. My Tamil teacher would go on tangentially in the class relating to random stories. I loved Tamil because they were not teaching boring grammar there. Such poetry should how language should be taught.

1.辩论应该是学校教育的核心内容。我不太擅长，但我看到别人高谈阔论时非常享受。即使在互联网时代之前，我们也讨论过《全面禁止核试验条约》、塔利班、亚洲金融危机、越南战争、孙中山、佩里、日本等问题。这种辩论非常有趣，让历史和其他学科变得生动活泼。

2.每年都有一个项目周，学校里会出现各种各样的摊位。一个有趣的地方是虚拟股票市场，我们学到了很多。金融教育应成为核心课程。

3.诗歌应该发挥更大的作用。我的泰米尔语老师会在课堂上天马行空地讲一些故事。我喜欢泰米尔语，因为它没有教枯燥的语法。语言就应该通过这样的诗歌来教授。

Science in the way in which it is taught should be completely removed. I mugged up things like 1 second = 9,192,631,770 orbit transitions of the Cesium-133 atom. I mean, who the fish cares. Or the time I spent on studying different types of buffaloes. Who the heck cares what I know about the Murrah? All that wasted time should be spent on simple experimentation, observation and logical thinking. If my life really centered on knowing Murrah, I would learn that from Wikipedia at that time. Stop feeding unnecessary stuff.

The only goal of the school should be to produce curious students who question. Do everything to increase their curiosity. If teaching about the Murrah makes them curious, let it be so. But, feed their curiosity and let them open their mouth widely - marveling the world. It is a stunning planet and they are at a stunning age. Let them explore, question and debate. That is all a teacher should enable.

科学的授课方式应该完全改革。我研究了铯133原子的轨道跃迁，1秒=9192631770。我的意思是，谁在乎这个结果？我花费时间研究不同种类的水牛。谁在乎我对么拉水牛了解不了解呢？所有被浪费的时间都应该花在简单的实验、观察和逻辑思考上。如果我的生活真的以了解么拉水牛为中心，我会从维基百科上了解到这一点。这些没用的东西不用再教了。

学校的唯一目的应该是培养好奇的学生。尽一切努力增加他们的好奇心。如果关于么拉水牛的教学内容让他们感到好奇，那就顺其自然吧。但是，请一定要满足他们的好奇心，让他们张大嘴巴——为这个世界惊叹。这是一颗令人惊叹的行星，他们正处在绝妙的年龄。让他们探索、提问、辩论。这才是老师应该做的。

In high school and college

College is among the most wasted times for most people. Indian Universities are neither like Taxila and Nalanda, where people expanded their mind nor places where they taught some job skills. They do neither. They waste 4 years of time without producing either scholars or people ready for jobs. You have to create at least one of them.

A student aged 17 has all the energy and none of the commitment. Best time to explore a variety of career paths and learn real world skills. What is the point in teaching them "Visual Basic" for 4 years when that technology would change so fast? Instead of teaching them technolgy, they should teach the art of programming.

在高中和大学阶段

对大多数人来说，大学时期是最浪费虚度的时间之一。印度的大学既不像塔西拉大学和纳兰达大学那样，人们能在那里开阔眼界，也不像有些地方，他们能学到一些工作技能。他们浪费了4年的时间，既没有培养出学者，也没有培养出做好就业准备的人。两者必须得实现一个吧。

一个17岁的学生拥有充沛的精力，却没有任何承诺。这是探索各种职业道路，学习真实世界生存技能的最佳时机。让他们学四年的“Visual Basic（可视化BASIC语言）”有什么意义呢？应该教她们编程的艺术，而不是技术。

 

Afroz Sheikh, Indian

From kindergarten up to bachelors, almost everything we study consists of Theory,theory and theory!

For example,we all studied about various cells in chemistry and physics during our high school. Here is an diagram of electrolytic cell

从幼儿园到本科，我们学习的几乎所有东西都由理论、理论和理论组成！

例如，我们都在高中化学和物理课上学习了各种电池。这是电解池的示意图

 

This diagram was made to understand the application of the cell in a simpler manner.But what the hell happened? Did we understood the application? Have we seen this cell in real life after studying? Hell no!

I scored something like 94/100 in science in X boards and I don't even know what this cell looks like in real.

Theories sit in our head like a fiction work because until we see them working we don't completely believe them.Though concepts like DNA and cell are hard to follow practically,other concepts like electric cell,magnetism,cathode rays in science must be explained with the help of actual electric cells and magnets.If not possible,at least their real life images should be presented.

Only theory is not science.

A teacher should teach in the methodology of theory followed by practicals.

这个图是为了以更简单的方式理解电池的应用。但到底发生了什么?我们理解了吗?在学习之后我们在现实生活中见过这个东西吗?不，没有!

我在科学考试中得了94/100高分，可我压根不知道现实中的电池是什么样子的。

理论就像虚构小说一样存在于我们的脑海中，因为除非我们真的眼见为实，我们才会完全相信它们。虽然像DNA和细胞这样的概念在实践中很难遵循，但是像电池、磁性、阴极射线这样的科学概念必须借助实际的电池和磁铁来解释。如果做不到，至少也应该展示生活中的真实图片。

只有理论学习并不是科学。

教师的教学应遵循理论方法论和实践方法论。

Illogical thing 2 :

I never liked history when I was in high school.Why? Because instead of emphasizing on the cause of wars in a great detail and talk about the then personalities, We were asked to remember the years in which the wars took place just because they will fetch good marks in the finals. I had to study about the dates and other factual stuff more than the qualities of the emperors.

Humanities aren't taught in the way they should be.

不合逻辑之事2:

我上高中时一直不喜欢历史，为什么?因为老师要求我们背诵战争发生的年代，而不是详细地解释战争的起因，或分析历史人物，原因就是背诵能让我们取得好成绩。我必须记忆历史时间和其他史实，而非皇帝的品性。

人文学科的教学并没有遵循合理的方法。

Illogical thing 3 :

We all know how we finish our final projects. We make the best of 'Copy and paste'.In fact some people are so lazy that they buy projects from others. In my class,a guy has a collection of projects and he has sold it to the majority of my class. In engineering colleges I have heard its even worse as they spend more time in project work.I mean copy and paste work.I'm not talking about all of them.There are sincere and dedicated students who do it.There are others who follow copy and paste rule.If that is the case then what's the point of giving project work?

Isn't it a waste of time and money?

In Indian colleges,projects are for namesake.

The list seems to be endless.

不合逻辑的事情3:

我们都知道如何完成毕业设计。我们会充分利用“复制粘贴”这个技巧。事实上，有些人非常懒惰，他们从别人那里购买毕业设计。在我的班上，有一个家伙有一系列毕业设计，卖给我们班的许多人。我听说工科院校的情况更糟，因为他们要花更多的时间。我的意思是复制粘贴。我不是说所有学生都这样。也有认真投入的学生是自己完成的。如果是这样的话，毕业设计还有什么意义呢?

这不是在浪费时间和金钱吗?

在印度的大学里，毕业设计都是以名字命名的。

这种糟点貌似说都说不完。

 

Soumya Sarkar, Student.... stuck in a stupid system

This great country of ours produces more engineers than the population of Sweden (or so they say). When 95-98% of this huge population of engineers choose their college on the basis of placements, you know something is horribly wrong with this education system.

From a small age we are bred like goat, waiting for the day when we would be sacrificed for human comfort. We are fed and made fat. We don't question the rope that ties us to the nearest pole. We only want more food, that is all.

Curiosity is a good thing really. I was curious. Not from a small age though. The education I was exposed to never let me come in contact with orbitals and relativity before they were absolutely necessary. When I came to know them, I wanted to learn more. Nobody would teach me relativity in school, except other curious friends.

我们这个伟大的国家培养出来的工程师比瑞典的人口还要多(至少他们是这么说的)。当95% -98%的工程师根据实习情况选择大学时，你就知道这种教育体系的问题有多严重。

从很小的时候起，我们就像山羊一样被圈养，等待着为人类牺牲自己的那一天。我们吃饱了，长胖了。我们不会质疑把我们拴在最近那根杆子上的绳子。我们只想要更多的食物，仅此而已。

好奇心真的是一件好事。我很好奇。但不是从小时候就有的。我所受的教育从来没有让我接触轨道和相对论，除非它们是绝对必要的。当我开始了解到这些知识时，我想学习更多。除了其他好奇的朋友，学校里没有人会教我相对论。

I wanted to go into the research line, which is looked down upon by this society. I did not choose engineering. I was made to, to be honest.

When you choose the wrong idol for worship, you know you are in a wrong religion. Indian education system trains us for the magical LPA (Lacs per Annum), a figure that can make up for all the countless boring hours you put behind it, and all the sacrifices you make.

So this is what I feel is wrong with this system.

我想进入这个被社会所轻视的研究领域。我没有选择工程学。老实说，我是天生的。

当你选择错误的偶像来崇拜时，你就知道你的信仰是错误的。印度的教育系统训练我们学习神奇的LPA(每年数十万)，这个数字可以弥补你在这上面投入的无数无聊的时间，以及你所做出的牺牲。

这就是我觉得这个系统的问题所在。

 

Vivek Baranwal, not a day without Quora

For me I would say the "Entrance exam of IIT for the Computer Science Enthusiasts".

I might be wrong but it always ponder me. If you want to take computer science branch in IIT then first clear JEE by rank 2 digit. This is totally absurd as what is asked in entrance exam is Physics, Chemistry and Math and out of whose syllabus hardly 5-15% is mattered. And nonetheless we have to study Physics and Chemistry at a very depth level but on arriving IIT find for computer science start everything right from scratch.

Mathematics is fine but chemistry has of no use. So it would be better why not have such a entrance exam that judge students based on their computer science knowledge, analytical & logical skills etc. rather than what we know about Mechanics, Thermodynamics or Ionic Equilibrium, organic chemistry.

Note: There can be grammatical error. Please ignore/correct those.

对我来说，我想说的是“计算机科学爱好者的印度理工学院入学考试”。

我可能说得并不对，但它总是引发我的思考。如果你想加入印度理工学院计算机科学学院，那么必须在联合入学考试中排在100名内。这是完全荒谬的，因为在入学考试中要求的是物理、化学和数学，教学大纲中只有不到5-15%是跟考试相关的。我们的物理和化学必须学到很高深的水平，但已进入印度理工学院的计算机科学专业，又要一切从头开始学。

数学还好，但化学毫无用处。所以，为什么不举办考察学生的计算机科学知识、分析和逻辑技能的考试，来甄选他们呢？为什么要根据我们对力学、热力学或离子平衡、有机化学的精通程度来甄选呢?

注意:可能有语法错误。请忽略/改正这些错误。

 

Zeina Shahid, Programmer by profession, writer by passion

What I'll always regret about my school experience is that activities outside the classroom, especially physical activities were never considered important. Growing up, PT was this one period that you didn't have to spend in the classroom. However, PT teachers seldom cared about teaching a sport or even conducting any kind of fitness related activity. As we went to higher grades and board exams were around the corner, PT period was what the theory subject teachers used to teach their subjects. As a result, we grew up with little to no physical activity. After I moved to the US for college, I've had a chance to observe their school system and I see how much importance is given to PE. Students actually learn how to play sports and also take fitness tests. It was when I started taking Taekwondo classes that I noticed how I was unable to perform even simple exercises that others performed with ease. We need to realize that education is not just mugging up textbooks. Fitness and physical activity are essential for a healthy lifestyle and what better time to inculcate these healthy habits, than school years?

我对我的学校生活感到遗憾的事就是课外活动，尤其是体育活动从来没有被重视过。在成长的过程中，体育课只是你可以呆在教室外的一段时间。然而，体育教师很少关心体育教学，甚至不关心任何与健身有关的活动。随着我们升入更高的年级，考试迫在眉睫，体育课就都被理论课老师拿来上课了。结果，我们在几乎没有体育活动的环境中长大了。我去美国上大学后，我有机会观察他们的学校制度，我发现了体育是多么重要。学生们学习如何进行体育运动，并参加体能测试。当我开始上跆拳道课的时候，我发现别人能轻松做到的简单动作我却做不到。我们需要认识到，教育不仅仅是死记硬背课本。健身和体育活动对于健康的生活方式是必不可少的，还有什么比上学期间更好的时间来灌输这些健康的习惯呢?

 

Ashutosh Pandey, works at Students

The suffocating rigidity of it.

Yesterday I had my ISC Chemistry Practical.

I asked for MgSO4 to prove presence of Carbonate Ion. The examiner told me you can't ask for extra chemicals.The lime water test is what the board recommends, but SO2 gives lime water test too.

Again, I Knew Alternate ways to prove presence of Aluminium Ion , But my teacher had already told me that was not permitted.

I love Quizzing , I've been to quite a few and done well in a few,too . My parents think I wasted time in Debates and Quizzes when I could have been studying. I can't blame them for thinking like that either, Extracurriculars count for nothing!

I am preparing for the JEE, I swear if I get in I am going to use that opportunity to study Physics instead of doing engineering.

令人窒息的死板僵硬。

昨天我有我的ISC化学实践。

我想要硫酸镁来证明碳酸盐离子的存在。考官告诉我，你不能要求额外的化学药品。委员会要求进行石灰水试验，但二氧化硫也可以进行石灰水试验。

同样，我知道其他能证明铝离子存在的方法，但我的老师告诉我这是不允许的。

我喜欢小测验，我参加过很多次，也有几次考得很好。我父母认为我本可以学习的时候却在辩论和小测验上浪费了时间。我也不能怪他们认为课外活动毫无价值的想法!

我正在准备联合入学考试，我发誓，如果我被录取，我就要利用这个机会学习物理，而不是工程专业。

 

Anonymous

After reading a few answers I think this question needs teachers perspective too. I did my post graduation from one of the prestigious institution of India and unlike my all friends I opted for teaching in school. After eight months of experience at least I can give a try to this question-

1. Grading system in high school: Instead of nourishing the students grading system lowered their learning skills. I don't favor the older system but grading system is not a solution. Due to it students don't take studies seriously. They all are immobilized by the spoon feeding done by the teachers. They know, no matter how weak their concepts are they will go through and that decreases their effort to learn anything. Leave science and maths, because of this students are not ready to study any other subjects.
2. Importance of marks: If you score low you can't have science stream. Who cares if you got less marks because of Social studies or Hindi or any other subject. What if you like maths and you scored less marks in that subject, no one cares what you like what matters is how you perform in those three hours. If you didn't perform well you cant have your favorite subject in future.
3. Unnecessary paperwork for teachers: Hard to explain but it do frustrate teachers and that affect their teaching. Sometime because of it a teacher don't get the needed rest ( exclude those teachers who don't take teaching seriously)
4. Importance to 10th and 12th: Our school system is like a triangle. Primary section is its base. If the base is strong we have to worry less about the top but all we care about is the top. The basics of students are more important. If we take care of it rest will turnout fine.
5. Priorities of students:Their utmost priority is marks and not knowledge. I remember once I was explaining a derivation of a formula and then a student asked that if derivation will come in exam or not. I was dumb struck for a moment and then i said that it doesn't matter whether it will be asked in exam or not but the point is you should know why we are using this. The point is they are studying for marks not for knowledge. (Exceptions are everywhere)

在阅读了一些答案后，我认为这个问题也需要教师的视角。我毕业于印度一所著名学府，和所有的朋友不同，我选择在学校教书。经过八个月的教学经验，我可以尝试一下这个问题

1. 高中阶段的等级制度：等级制度非但没有帮助学生，反而降低了他们的学习技能。我不喜欢旧的系统，但等级系统不是一个解决方案。因此，学生对待学习并不严肃。他们都习惯了老师填鸭式的教学方式了。他们知道，不管他们的概念有多薄弱，他们都能通过考试，这会减少他们学习任何东西的动力。除了科学和数学，因为这学生不准备学习任何其他科目。
2. 分数的重要性：如果你的分数很低，你就进不了理科班。谁会在乎你社会实践课、印地语或其他科目的分数比较低呢。如果你喜欢数学，而你在那门课上的分数较低，没人在乎你喜欢什么，重要的是你在那三个小时的考试时间里的表现。如果你成绩不好，你就不能学习你最喜欢的科目。

3.教师不必要的文书工作：很难解释，但确实让教师感到沮丧，影响他们的教学。有时，老师也因此得不到必要的休息(不包括那些不认真对待教学的老师)

4. 第十和第十二年级的重要性：我们的学校系统就像一个三角形。基础教育是基层。如果底部很坚固，我们不用担心高年级的学习，我们只关心高年级。其实学生的基础更重要。如果基础打好了，接下来就好办了。
5. 学生的首要任务：他们最重要的是分数，而不是知识。我记得有一次我在解释一个公式的推导过程时，一个学生问我，考试会不会考这个推导。我愣了一会儿，然后我说，考试中会不会考到这个知识点并不重要，但关键是你应该知道我们为什么要用这个。问题在于他们学习是为了分数而不是为了知识。

 

Anonymous

I went to a school in Mumbai that had reputation of producing merit holders every year. Must be good school right who must have produced scientists?...Hell No

1) I remember in 4th STD, mathematics teacher shouted----Students mathematics is very difficult, if you don't study, you fail. Guess what- 20% students failed in 4th STD. Then in front of entire class their names were called out which was even more disgusting than failing.

2) A for Apple is the first thing we learn and it's by hearted. Even if today you are asked A forrrr? Your brain automatically thinks Apple. That brings me to rote studies. Everything was meant to be by hearted including physics. No experiments on gravity, centrifugal forces, politics etc. In Finland, only 4 hours in a week are lectures in class, 2 hours for personality development, and rest all is practicality where teachers and students do experiments.

3) In my school there were 20% students who were top 10 in the class, but their intelligence was attributed to educated grandparents and parents. Most of them were Brahmins, so if you saw these students and their parents, their thought process was advanced. But naturally they meant to excel. Which brings me to another point that education system failed to develop average or weak students. In Finland, if one teaching method fails, all teachers come up with another option. They develop all students equally including weak students. They simply don't differentiate.

4) Manners were never developed. Say "thank you" is something that was to be said to sound as if you are doing favour. Cleanliness next to godliness was just meant to be written on board. When I had gone to Europe, I saw people greeting sweeper on the road. In India, we are never taught that in schools. Sure we are told not to differentiate, but our teachers and parents are the ones who start differentiating. Other countries people say "thank you" even at the smallest thing. In Japan, till 4th std, major focus is on manners.

我曾就读于孟买的一所学校，该校以每年都培养大批优秀学生而闻名。这所学校肯定是好学校，对吗？一定培养除了科学家？不，并没有。

1）我记得在4年级，数学老师大声说：“学生们，数学很难学，如果你不学习，考试就会不及格。”你猜怎么着？有20%的学生没有通过4年级考试。然后老师当着全班同学的面叫出了他们的名字，这比考试不及格更恶心。

2）我们学到的第一件事就是A代表苹果，我们很用心地记住了。即使今天有人问你A是什么？你的大脑会自动想到苹果。这让我想到死记硬背。所有知识都靠记忆，包括物理。没有什么关于重力，离心力的实验。在芬兰，每周只有4个小时是课堂授课，2个小时是个性发展，其余时间都是教师带着学生做实验的实践课。

3）在我的学校，有20%的学生在班里名列前十，但他们的智商要归功于受过良好教育的祖父母和父母。他们大多数是婆罗门，所以如果你看到这些学生和他们的父母，他们的思维方式比普通人强。但自然而然，他们想要出类拔萃。这让我想到了另一个观点，教育系统会放弃普通或较差的学生。在芬兰，如果一种教学方法失败了，所有的老师都会想出另一种方法。他们平等地培养所有学生，包括成绩差的学生。他们一视同仁，不会区别对待。

4）没有教授礼仪。说“谢谢”听起来像是在帮你的忙。当我去欧洲的时候，我看见人们在路上会和清洁工打招呼。在印度，学校从来没有教过我们这个。当然，我们被告知不能对别人区别对待，但我们的老师和父母正是那些对别人区别对待的人。其他国家的人即使对最小的事也会说“谢谢”。

5) Top 10 students were called for extra classes after school, why wouldn't they be merit holders then? 80% students remained average. This highlights the ranking system. Everything is rank, marks were called out for all in front of the class which was horrible. More than brain development, everything was "how much score you got?". In Finland, there is no grading system as such. Every child is developed keeping his previous areas of development in mind.

6) Now till 7th I guess there are no exams. But unfortunately this has caused disaster in nation's educational system, because teachers have become more laid back. No one knows areas of development and strengths of students. My neighbour's child is in a well known school. Unfortunately now he is in 8th and doesn't understand maths, physics etc. Teachers called his parents and said "your child isn't intelligent, we doubt he will clear. Why isn't he good in studies?". Had I been his parent, I would have asked teacher "what the hell were you doing for all these years then?". In India, parents are busy working which makes them ignore their child's study and are dependent on school. And teachers are least bothered to develop all students equally. If you give rose/chocolates to teachers, they remember you often. No wonder we learn to please our bosses once we start working. In Finland, all teachers have to be post graduate. Out of their 6600 applications, only 600 got selected. Their system isn't just clear exam and you are in. In India, just pass B.ed, talk loudly and then you are clear to be a teacher.

Even today the educational system is the same all over India. Weak students can't even dream of IIM/IITs. Does that mean they can never succeed?

We don't learn to become wise. We learn so as to hold our head up in the society.

5）排名前十的学生放学后被要求补课，难怪他们能成为优等生呢？80%的学生保持在平均水平。这就凸显了排名体系。所有人的分数都会在全班面前公布，这太可怕了。一切都围绕着“你得了多少分?”。在芬兰，则没有这样的评分制度。

6）现在直到7年级才开始有考试。但不幸的是，这给国家的教育体系带来了灾难，因为教师变得更加懒散。没有人知道学生的特长和优势。我邻居的孩子在一所名校读书。不幸的是，现在他已经八年级了，对数学、物理等都一窍不通。老师们打电话给他的父母说:“你的孩子不太聪明，我们怀疑他能不能通过考试。为什么他学习不好?”如果我是他的父母，我就会问老师:“那么这些年来你到底教了什么?”在印度，父母忙于工作，这使得他们忽视了孩子的学习，依赖学校。而且老师们才不会费心地培养所有的学生。如果你给老师送玫瑰/巧克力，他们会经常想起你。难怪我们一开始工作就会取悦老板。在芬兰，所有的老师都必须是研究生学历。在6600份申请中，只有600份能被选中。他们的制度不只是通过考试就行。在印度，只要拿到B就可以了。音量够大，通过考试，你就能成为一名教师。

即使在今天，整个印度的教育体系也还是一样的。成绩差的学生对印度理工学院想都不敢想。这是否意味着他们永远不会成功?

我们并不是因为学习才变得聪明。我们学习是为了在社会上昂首阔步。