农历新年第一天,中国就秀军事肌肉

China's flexed its military muscles on the first day of the Lunar New Year by posting a dramatic pr

494A098600000578-5400863-J_20_stealth_fighter_made_its_first

China's flexed its military muscles on the first day of the Lunar New Year by posting a dramatic propaganda video of its latest fighter jets.

农历新年第一天,中国就秀军事肌肉,放出了最新战机的宣传视频。

The footage, released by China's Air Force through its social media account, features two types of war planes: J-20 and Sukhoi SU-35s.

中国空军发布了歼20和苏35战机的视频。

J-20 is capable of carrying multiple types of air-to-air missiles and could apparently dodge radar detectors; while Sukhoi SU-35s, imported from Russia, is said to be more powerful than the west's fourth-generation aircraft.

歼20能搭载多款空对空导弹和可以躲避雷达的探测器,而从俄罗斯进口的苏35,据说比西方四代机更强大。

英国网贴翻译:

译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/44282.html

thebestcountry, london, United Kingdom, 15 hours ago

as always they *borrowed* ideas from somewhere else.
7
63

跟往常一样,他们是从其他地方“借来”创意的

 

Donald, Toronto, Canada, 13 hours ago

during world war II...the German planes, tanks and weaponry were technologically far superior to anything that the allies (US, UK and USSR) had, yet they lost...they lost because what the allies were producing were cheaper and easier to manufacture and ultimately the Germans could not handle the numbers that the allies through at them....don't underestimate what lower tech can do in numbers, it would be a mistake
4
9

二战时期,德国战机、坦克等武器,技术比(美国、英国和苏联等)盟军的先进多了,不还是打输了

德国打输的原因是,盟军武器生产简单,成本低,德国最终在数量上被盟军压倒。

别低估了低技术武器的数量优势,否则就会犯大错。

damocles sword, Stockton California, United States, 13 hours ago

If you are not borrowing, copying or adapting the best the other side has, you are not there to win. There¿s no such thing as cheating in war.
1
3

不借鉴最新技术,或者说不抄袭和接受最新技术,你是打不赢的。

Patriot-1, Washington D.C., United States, 11 hours ago

You are correct Donald, but that was WWII. With today's technology it's all about hitting your enemy before they even see you. Throwing masses at your enemy no longer is advantageous. Disrupting their communications and command as well as hitting them "silently" will win the day.
0
3

说得对。不过那是二战了

当今技术已经相当发达了,敌人没看到你,你就能将其消灭。

靠数量取胜已经过时了。

破坏敌方的通信系统是关键

thebestcountry, london, United Kingdom, 11 hours ago

disagree. Russian tanks T34 was way better. it had best manoeuvrability, was light, fast, shot faster. in case of Chinese, why not to confess that they borrowed ides from other countries instead of presenting their plane as their outstanding achievement
0
4

不同意。二战期间,俄罗斯的T34坦克先进多了,机动性强,重量轻,行进速度快,射速快。

中国人为什么不承认是从其他国家抄袭来的,干嘛非要说成是自己的成就。

 

bankofdad, Ottawa, Canada, 14 hours ago

Looks like it is made of recycled tin cans...........cheers
2
23

看起来像是废弃锡罐制成的

 

Donald, Toronto, Canada, 14 hours ago

don't let pure propaganda blind you.....during the cold war, soviet planes (not weaponry) were always far superior to anything that the west produced....better aerodynamic design, lower cost, easier maintenance and superior agility...sort of like the AK47
23
6

别被宣传误导了

冷战时期,苏联战机一直比西方战机先进。

气动设计更先进,成本更低,易于维护。机动性更强。

 

David Chadwick, Anywhere, United Kingdom, 14 hours ago

Donald, you are wrong. Did you notice what happened when soviet tech went up against US tech in places like Iraq? The US easily wiped out the soviet made armor and air force of Saddam which was one of the largest in the world. The Russians and Chinese are still playing catch-up.
5
28

有没有发现,在伊拉克战争,苏联武器碰上美国武器的结果?

美国武器轻易就消灭苏联武器。

俄罗斯人和中国人仍然在后面追赶

David Chadwick, Anywhere, United Kingdom, 11 hours ago

Donald, not a single US tank was destroyed in the Iraq war compared to hundreds of Russian made tanks destroyed. Don't tell me that it was all because of the superior crews. That dog won't hunt.
3
9

伊拉克战争期间,没有一辆美国坦克被摧毁,而俄罗斯坦克被摧毁了几百辆。

别跟我说这是驾驶技术的问题

 

Donald, Toronto, Canada, 14 hours ago

The most terrifying thing about Chinese weapons is....how cheap they can manufacture them. That's the tipping point where sheer numbers can beat any technological advantage.
9
15

中国武器最令人畏惧的是,生产成本很低。

可以靠数量优势压倒对方的技术优势

 

Jinkster, New York, United States, 13 hours ago

apparently we're not 10 times better...their tech is catching up way too fast..
3
3

显然,我们不是遥遥领先,他们的技术也在迅速追赶

 

Galahad, The Meadows, United States, 12 hours ago

Weapons systems become much cheaper if you don't have to fund the R&D from start till finish.
0
10

省了研发上的投入,造出来的武器当然便宜。

 

Sapientis, London, United Kingdom, 11 hours ago

The cost of producing weapons is much lower than US.Also China has a huge work force which allows it to mass produce huge quantity of weapons.
0
2

中国生产武器的成本比美国低多了

而且中国有一支庞大的劳动力大军,有能力大规模生产武器

 

Gusgus, Indianapolis, United States, 14 hours ago

Do your homework ... An American pilot sitting in a F-35 would destroy this thing in a heartbeat.
7
54

美国飞行员开一架F35战机,击落歼20还不是轻轻松松的事情

Jinkster, New York, United States, 13 hours ago

F35 have no chance beating J20. F22 very possible
34
7

F35是击落不了歼20的,F22就能

 

Sapientis, London, United Kingdom, 11 hours ago

You are still stuck in denial mode.In other 20 years China will be out class US in military and economic strength.Reason is simple.China has a huge population,the government has made STEM education (science,technology,engineering and maths) a priority.China has a lot of money because it has a big manufacturing base and trade with world.Where did China steal quantum communications from since only China has it?
13
4

你仍然不愿意接受现实啊

再过20年,中国军事和经济就能超过美国

原因很简单。中国人口众多,政服重视科技的发展,注重工程和数学的教育。

中国建立了一个庞大的制造业基地,通过与世界各地展开贸易往来,累积了巨额财富。

当今世界,只有中国才掌握量子通信技术,你说中国从哪里偷去啊?

 

TheTruthHurtsALot, Everywhere, United States, 14 hours ago

It's not the plane, it's the pilot flying it. Time and time again it's been proven that training trumps technology. We have it, they don't.
5
42

取胜的关键不是看谁的飞机先进,而是看飞行员的技术

一次又一次地证明,飞行员的训练很重要。

这点我们做得很好

 

TheGrimReaperUK, Englandshire, United Kingdom, 12 hours ago

Made in China... will break within 1 week... plus whoever buys them will be pestered with poor-grammar emails begging them to leave a 5-star ebay review... nothing to worry about here...
5
35

中国制造嘛。

一周就会坏掉的。

 

Burv88, new romney, United Kingdom, 12 hours ago

Just looks a bit old tech imho...
1
16

恕我直言,看起来有些老旧

 

JayAllen, Warwick Rhode Island, United States, 10 hours ago

Chinese propaganda. They said pretty much the same thing about the one "Aircraft carrier" they have. Which compared to U.S. and British aircraft carriers is a joke.
2
38

中国人的宣传啦。

中国人也大吹特吹他们的“航母”,还煞有介事地拿来和美国航母与英国航母进行比较。

 

txbicow, east london, United Kingdom, 7 hours ago

dangerous world we are living in
2
4

我们生活在一个危险的世界

 

阅读: