不丹承认洞朗属于中国领土,印度网民怎么评

【标题】Bhutan acknowledges that Doklam is a Chinese area: Chinese official中国官方:不丹承认洞朗属于中国领土BEIJING: In

【标题】Bhutan acknowledges that Doklam is a Chinese area: Chinese official

中国官方:不丹承认洞朗属于中国领土

BEIJING: In a stunning -but unsubstantiated- claim, a senior Chinese official said today that Bhutan has acknowledged that the Doklam area where the Indian and Chinese troops are engaged in a standoff does not belong to it.

China's top diplomat on the boundary issue, Wang Wenli, told a visiting Indian media delegation that Bhutan has conveyed to Beijing through the diplomatic channels that the area of the standoff is not its territory.

She provided no evidence for the claim, which is at the complete variance with Bhutan's stated position and actions. Bhutan had protested to the Chinese government, accusing it of violating a bilateral pact after its troops tried to construct a road in the Doklam area on June 16.

北京:一个虽震惊但未经证实的说法,中国一位高级官员今天称,不丹已经承认,印度和中国军队在对峙的洞朗地区并非其领土。中国关于边界问题的最高外交官王文丽告诉来访的印度媒体代表团,不丹已经通过外交渠道向北京传达了这一立场。
而她并没有提出关于索赔的证据,这与不丹的立场和行动不一致。不丹曾就其军队于6月16日在德克拉姆地区建设道路提出抗议,称其违反双边条约。

"After the incident, the Bhutanese made it very clear to us that the place where the trespassing happened is not Bhutan's territory," said Wang, who is the Deputy Director General of the Department of Boundary and Ocean Affairs of the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

中国外交部边界和海洋事务司司长王永平表示:“事件发生后,不丹清晰地表明,被入侵的地区并非不丹领土。”

A statement issued by India's External Affairs Ministry on June 30 said, "On June 16, a PLA (People's Liberation Army) construction party entered the Doklam area and attempted to construct a road. It is our understanding that a Royal Bhutan Army patrol attempted to dissuade them from this unilateral activity."

印度对外事务部6月30日发表声明:“6月16日,解放军建设队进入洞朗地区,试图修建道路,但不丹皇家巡逻队试图劝阻他们进行此类单方面活动。“

India had also cited the Bhutanese Foreign Ministry as emphasising that "the construction of the road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the 1988 and 1998 agreements between Bhutan and China and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between these two countries. They have urged a return to the status quo as before June 16, 2017."

India also conveyed to the Chinese government that the road construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for it. India says both sides should first pull back their troops for any talks to take place.

印方引用不丹外交部强调:“不丹境内的道路修建违反了中国与不丹1988~1998的协议,影响双边划界进程,并呼吁撤回到6月16日前的原状。”对此,印方向中国传达了道路施工的重大影响,印方称双方理应先撤兵再进行谈判。

timg.jpg

资料图

印度网友评论

译文来源:三泰虎 http://www.santaihu.com/43442.html

Greg Harrison——
India must stop trampling on Bhutan’s sovereignty Marco Hung says if left to China and Bhutan, the Doklam border dispute could be easily resolved. Instead, an overbearing New Delhi, mistaking Bhutan as its ‘protectorate’, has just made things worse

印度应该停止践踏不丹!离开中国和不丹,边界问题很容易解决。但一个霸道的新德里将不丹当成“保护国”使得事情变得更严重了!

 

Chiranjib Chakrabarti——
Man ask any Bhutanese people .They siding with china and saying India is doing wrong. I dont know why we taking risk for bhutan then .I have talked to many bhutanese people and they all supporting china
I have talked to many Bhutanese people but common Bhutanese are supporting China (So far I know as I stay in siliguri corridor) stance than India . They saying why India doing it ...Why then we supporting Bhutan in this matter and creating unnecessary war like situation?

利益相关:接触过不丹的人。
他们和中国表态是印度错了。
我不知道为什么我们要为不丹冒风险。
我和几个不丹人交谈过,他们都支持中国。
普通不丹人(西藏走廊范围)更支持中国立场,他们不明白为什么印度这么做。为什么我们在这个事件上支持不丹然后制造不必要的战争呢?

 

Rohit Naik——
Why Bhutan is silent on this issue ?

为什么不丹在这个问题上沉默了?

 

Saranathan Lakshminarasimhan——
it is another bluff and lie from china
India should resist to the last
it is right stand
it is our part and India should never accept any compromise

中国在虚张声势!印度应该抵制到最后!这才是正确的。
这是印度的领土!印度不接受任何妥协!

 

Rajan.N——
yesterday only news was published that bhutan is against china , intruding into disputed area and building roads. to-day chinese official is making a false claim, china was making threats about kashmir earlier also and openly supporting pakisthan terrorists outfits leaders like AzHAR, HAFIZSYED .building roads in pakisthan occupied kashmir?

昨日新闻称不丹反对中国侵入争议领土。
今天中国官员做了虚假声明。中国此前也对克什米尔造成威胁,公开支持巴基斯坦恐怖武装领导人。

 

Jaguar Ji——
Never mind who says what, Indians should kill chinese in all parts of the world

不管别人说什么,印度人应该杀了世界上所有的中国人!

 

Tapan K——
Again Govt must ask Bhutan to spell out the truth if its an alley of India. Well China can do anything with its mighty foreign reserve.

政府必须再次要求不丹说明立场!中国可是可以利用外汇储备做任何事情的!

 

Mukesh——
Give them a dose of their own medicine our entire frint line should move into Tibet.

让他们吃药吧!
我们应该全线进入西藏

 

Pkd1954 Kumar——
It is Red Dragon''s design of diplomatic battle

这是中国的外交手段!

 

Maharaj Gupta——
Chinese are the biggest liars and the most dishonest people on earth. First question is that why did they have boundary dispute with all their neighbours? Simply because they wanted to grab others '' territory. The 14 countries with whom the disputes have been settled have been done by bullying them

中国人是世界上最大的骗子!
为什么他们总会与邻国有边界争端?
那已经解决的14个邻国边界争端是靠欺凌完成的!

 

Vasudeva Ungati——
if it was not Bhutanese, china would have occupied long back. The point here is to maintain the status quo at the tri junction. India should not fall back. also it was Bhutan which escalated the issue first with China. they did not retreat, then india acted

如果不是不丹,中国早就常驻了。
这里是三方重点区域。
印度不会退缩,不丹将问题抛给了中国。
他们不撤退,印度也是!

 

Ramesh M——
Slap on our foreign policymakers

我们的外交政策真废!

 

Chanakya In——
These are all cheap tricks. Tomorrow, china will say, Bhutan has agreed to be a part of China.

低贱的手段,明天中国又会说不丹同意成为中国领土了。

 

Indian Patriot——
It is easy for a country like China to lure smaller nations by different means....if they are hell bent to get to that area, I am sure Indian think tank would have thought through to defend the route to north east...but nevertheless, my hate to China is increasing

中国这样的国家用各种手段蒙骗小国。
如果他们害怕此地,我相信印度智囊团会捍卫北去的道路!
然而我更憎恨中国了!

 

Kshitij Saxena——
Either Chinese are mad? or Indian media is too stupid

是中国疯了还是印度媒体傻逼了?

 

阅读: