报道：中日关系越发紧张，日本将部署导弹 [英国媒体]

Japan to develop missile as tensions with China mount – reports

报道：中日关系越发紧张，日本将部署导弹



Japan will develop a new land-to-sea missile as part of plans to beef up itsdefence of remote southern islands, as tensions with China increase over the disputed territory, a report said Sunday.

周日有报道称由于中日关系因为争议岛屿变得越发紧张，日本将部署陆对海导弹以加强对南部偏远岛屿的防卫。

The two countries are locked in a long-running dispute over the uninhabited islets known as the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu in China.

两国长久以来都因为东海争议岛屿而关系紧张。

The report comes after repeated protests by Japanese foreign ministry officials over what Tokyo calls “intrusions” by Chinese ships in the territorial and contiguous waters of the rocky islands.

此前，日本外交部官员多次抗议中国船只“入侵”争议岛屿海域。

Tokyo plans to deploy the weapon, which reportedly will have a range of 300km (190 miles) on islands such as Miyako in Okinawa prefecture, the top-selling Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper said, without citing sources.

日本计划在冲绳地区的宫古岛等岛屿上部署这些航程达300公里的导弹，读卖新闻报道，但没有援引消息来源。

The range will cover the disputed island chain, the Yomiuri said, adding that the deployment is expected by 2023.

读卖新闻报道称这一射程将覆盖争议岛链，预计在2023年部署。

Officials at the Defence Ministry could not be reached for comment.

未能联系到国防部官员就此事发表看法。



simaqingshan 1h ago
Anyone invade into china will be punished inevitably ,no matter how far the distance is

犯我中华者虽远必诛

JP Mower  simaqingshan 1h ago
I am not sure anyone would be stupid enough to invade China in the 21st century.

我猜在21世纪的今天没有哪个国家蠢到去入侵中国。

bobmacy 5h ago
About time they started defending themselves instead of relying on American blood.

他们是时候靠自己保护自己了，而不是靠美国人为他们流血。

HandsomeMoustache  bobmacy 4h ago
hahaha..... When did the U.S. ever spill blood on behalf of the Japanese?
I know it can't be the Korean war because that started whilst Japan was still an occupied country.

哈哈哈，美国什么时候为日本流过血了？
我知道不可能是朝鲜战争，因为那时候的日本还被美国占领着。

quarrytone  bobmacy 3h ago
Name one American drop of blood spilled defending Japan?

请举一个美国为日本流血的例子来？

JP Mower  quarrytone 1h ago
You could reference Japanees involvement in WW1 where they actively supported the Entente Powers and in doing so were fighting in support of U.S forces.

比如日本参与一战支持协约国，这么一来就相当于支持美国部队进行战斗。

MyNameIsNobody 5h ago
Yes of course....develop weapons instead of foreign policy that may find an amicable end....such is the mind set of the every popular and evil Abe government.

是吖，当然，发展武器而不是依赖外交政策肯定会获得一个良好的结局。。。这就是这就是受欢迎的邪恶安倍政府的心态。

ShanghaiGuy  MyNameIsNobody 3h ago
Alternatively....Yes of course...build artificial bases in disputed waters and threaten neighbours instead of foreign policy that may find an amicable end.....such is the mindset of the very popular and evil Xi regime...

作为一种选择，当然是如此。。。在争议海域建造人工岛基地、威胁邻国而不是依靠外交政策这也会获得良好的结局。。。这就是受欢迎的邪恶中国政府的心态。

Kieran Rainbow  MyNameIsNobody 3h ago
the problem is the Chinese government may not care about foreign policy solutions. Since they seem to be following the old 'we are strong & we take what we want' attitude.

问题是中国政府可能也不愿意采取外交办法来解决问题。因为貌似中国现在所采取的是“我们很强大所以我们为所欲为”的态度。

Kimpatsu  MyNameIsNobody 3h ago
That's because the Yayoi are the master race. Funny that the Chinese think the same about the Han.

那是因为 弥生时代（具体指日本历史上约自公元前200年至公元200年）是优等民族。有趣的是中国人也是这么看待汉人的。

Slick7 6h ago
The Japanese - given their role in WW2 - shouldn't be allowed to devolop missiles.

考虑到日本在二战中的角色，不应该允许日本发展导弹。

BG Davis  Slick7 5h ago
Who is going to not "allow" them? Japan is a sovereign nation.
How long are you planning on using WWII as a reason for anything?
Let's all play the game:
The Allies - given their ruthless bombing of civilians in WW2 - shouldn't be allowed to have airplanes.
The PRC - given its massacres of its own people over a period of many years - shouldn't be allowed to have a military.
The DPRK - given its ruthless and brutal suppression of its own people - shouldn't be allowed to have central government

什么允许不允许，日本是主权国家。你还要继续使用二战这个借口多久？
我也可以这么说：
同盟国二战期间残忍的轰炸无辜平民，也不应该拥有飞机。
考虑到ZG多年来的屠杀人民，也不应该拥有军队。
朝鲜残酷无情的镇压自己的人民，也不应该拥有中央政府。

Kieran Rainbow  Slick7 3h ago
things change, potential enemies change you keep up with the changes or you get crushed.

世界在变，可能的敌人在变，你不变的话，就会输。

MsSnoopier  Slick7 45m ago
The yanks should have all their nukes removed then!

按你这么说的话，美国佬也应该销毁自己的全部核武器！

richp 6h ago
Wouldn't it be more effective to buy some missiles rather than develop their own from scratch?

与其自己从头开始研发导弹，直接购买难道不是更快吗？

JP Mower  richp 6h ago

North Korea seem to be producing a few, perhaps they could buy some of theirs.

朝鲜好像有在生产，或许日本可以向朝鲜购买。

jacknbox  richp 5h ago
Well, that could be a problem if their goal is to go after their weapon's supplier. They went against their scrap metals supplier in the last round and did not come out pretty.

如果日本的目标是攻击其导弹的供应者，那么从对方那里购买导弹就是不明智的。日本之前反对自己的废金属供应国，最后的结果并不美丽。

JP Mower 6h ago
For many decades, Imperial Japan has been cloaking itself with the pretense of pacifism, yet Prime Minister Abe has successfully torn away the pretense to garner political support.
Make no mistake, the world has not forgotten Japan's monstrous behaviour in Manchuria and the Korean Peninsula prior to WW11, nor it's equally monstrous behaviour toward those countries it occupied during WW11. They have never apologised for their actions yet seem to want an apology from the U.S for it's bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I have no sympathy for Japan in it's claims on these islands and have no desire for New Zealand to be politically embroiled in the politics of it all.

几十年来日本帝国主义一直用和平主义掩饰自己，而首相安倍已经成功的揭开这个掩饰的外衣以获取政治支持。
但是，世界并没有忘记二战前日本在满洲里和朝鲜半岛的残忍行为，也没有忘记二战期间它对亚洲占领地区的行径。他们从来没有为自己的行为道歉，可是却希望美国为原子弹爆炸道歉。
日本对这些岛屿声称主权我并不支持，我也不希望新西兰卷入这个争议中去。

ShanghaiGuy  JP Mower 3h ago
Er with respect outside NZ doubt anyone cares what NZ thinks about this....

在新西兰之外，我觉得应该没人关心新西兰对这个争议的看法吧。。。

JP Mower  ShanghaiGuy 3h ago
Yet China has been requesting support in the United Nations from our near neighbour the kingdom of Tonga. With respect i think you will find that in international politics/diplomacy, the opinions of voting members are courted and desired.

可是中国已经要求我们的邻国汤加在联合国里面支持中国。所以我想对你说的是在国际政治/外交中，有投票权的成员都比较抢手。

ricohflex 9h ago
Diaoyutai is Chinese territory. USA handed it to Japan "for administration". 
Not ownership. 
Japan concocted a pretentious farce of "buying the island" from an alleged "private owner". 
Actually what Japan did regarding Diaoyutai is an Act of War. 
Which is exactly what US wanted. 
To start a war between China and Japan. 
The #1 economy schemes to start a war bettween the #2 and #3 economies. 
So that both of them will decline and the #1 retains its position.

钓鱼台是中国领土。美国交给日本的是管理权而非拥有权。
日本捏造了所谓的“购岛”闹剧。日本对钓鱼台的做法简直就是战争行为。
而这正是美国想要的。中日之间的战争。第一经济体计划在第二和第三经济体之间挑起战争。
渔翁得利。

finalcentury  ricohflex 9h ago
Actually, the government purchased the islands to prevent Japanese Nationalists from building on and occupying the island. The Chinese news media accurately reported this, then suddenly changed the story in order to foment anti-Japanese nationalism. 
No one was ever born on that island. The only people ever to live there for an extended period of time were a handful of Japanese operating a fish drying facility before WWII - but it was not a place anyone could call "home".
The dispute is an excellent example of failed human intelligence.

实际上，日本政府的购岛行为防止了日本民族主义者建设和占领该岛屿。中国新闻媒体也进行了准确的报道，但是突然间改变风向，目的是为了挑起反日民族主义。
这个岛屿上从来没人居住。
只有二战前的一些日本人为了进行鱼干加工而在岛上居住了一段时间，但是这不是一个可以称之为“家”的地方。
这个争议正证明了人类智能的失败。

DCBill0  finalcentury 8h ago
Most of human intelligence is failed

大部分的人类智能已经失败。

BG Davis  ricohflex 5h ago
Troll on. You left out how the Evil US Capitalist Imperialist Dogs keep the Korean Peninsula divided so that they can continue to work their nefarious schemes throughout the region.

继续扯。你忘了邪恶的美国资本主义帝国主义狗是怎么分裂朝鲜半岛从而可以继续在整个地区进行卑鄙的勾当了。

tocq1 9h ago
Diaoyu belongs to Taiwan and was illegally handed over by the US to Japan to garner a few points in a textile dispute.

钓鱼岛属于台湾，美国非法的将该岛屿转手给日本。