安倍向美国表达“不首先使用”核政策的担忧 [日本媒体]

Abe tells U.S. of Japan's concern about 'no first use' nuclear policy

安倍向美国表达“不首先使用”核政策的担忧



WASHINGTON —Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has expressed concern about the possible adoption by the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama of a “no first use” policy for the U.S. nuclear arsenal, according to a column carried in the Monday edition of the Washington Post.

华盛顿——日本首相安倍就奥巴马政府可能采用“不首先使用”核政策表示担忧，周一《华盛顿邮报》上的一篇专栏文章如此写道。

Citing a weakening of deterrence against countries such as North Korea, Abe conveyed his concern to Adm Harry Harris, commander of the U.S. Pacific Command, columnist Josh Rogin wrote, quoting two U.S. government officials.

专栏作家Josh Rogin援引两位美国政府官员的话写道，安倍对美国太平洋舰队司令哈里斯表达了关切，认为这一政策会削弱对朝鲜这样的国家的威慑。



WakarimasenAUG. 16, 2016 - 04:41PM JST
Incredible. after all the recent tears and hand wringing about Hiroshima and Nagasaki he then encourages US to aggressively state nuclear intentions.

难以置信。在最近因为广岛和长崎而落泪痛苦之后，他现在竟然鼓励美国侵略性地表明自己的核意向。

MoonrakerAUG. 16, 2016 - 04:48PM JST
Hypocrisy.

虚伪。

FarmboyAUG. 16, 2016 - 05:07PM JST
This is a very weird position for Japan in particular to be pushing.

日本的这种立场真是够奇葩的。

Fred LewisAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:05PM JST
IMO - Nothing weird about this posture on the allies part at all - the world & the US in particular have allowed unstable powers such as North Korea to become nuclear capable and so the rest of the members of the club need to maintain a first strike capable doctrine as a suitable deterrent to those who daily give the bird to the UN and everything they stand for...

在我看来，美国盟友持有这种立场并不奇葩。世界以及美国允许类似朝鲜这样的不稳定国家获得核武器，所以其他国家需要采取首先使用核武器的原则，从而对那些经常发出威胁的国家造成威慑。

LagunaAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:15PM JST
CH3CHO, MAD applies to nuclear armed countries with reliable delivery systems, in which case its elaboration is not required - but for countries such as North Korea (and Iran, etc.), such a statement could be quite useful in ratcheting down tensions. Abe's opposition to this is unforgivable, not just as it betrays Japan's anti-nuclear heritage but because it is foolishly counter-productive.

相互威慑理论适用于拥有可靠传送系统的核武国家，在这种情况下没必要详细阐述。但是对于朝鲜和伊朗这样的国家，这样的声明就非常有利于降低紧张氛围。而安倍对这种声明的反对是不可原谅的，因为这违背了日本的反核传统，也因为他的这种做法会产生适得其反的效果。

katsu78AUG. 16, 2016 - 06:21PM JST
Survivors of the U.S. atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 and members of antinuclear groups, meanwhile, expressed their anger over the Japanese government’s opposition to Obama’s move, saying it runs counter to their efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons.
Good. The Hibakusha need to get on this, and Abe needs to be banned from cynically exploiting their memorials for political benefit if he's going to immediately turn around and undermine everything they're calling for.

“广岛和长崎轰炸的幸存者和反核团体成员就日本政府对奥巴马举动的反对表示愤怒，称这与他们消灭核武器的努力背道而驰。”
很好。核爆幸存者需要继续加油，同时也要禁止安倍利用他们来为自己谋取私利。

Peter QinghaiAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:25PM JST
People are forgetting that whoever takes the Oval Office in November will most likely nix this policy.

人们似乎忘了，11月份无论谁入主白宫，都非常有可能否定这项政策。

LagunaAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:30PM JST
Peter, the next US President is almost certainly Clinton. If Obama does make this mostly symbolic but very historical gesture, doubt she would reverse it.

下一届美国总统几乎可以肯定是希拉里。如果奥巴马实行了这个非常象征性而又非常历史性的举动的话，那么我认为希拉里不会去否定。

1glennAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:40PM JST
After reading the article, it seems that the rationale for opposing a "no first use" nuclear policy is that it would, theoretically, increase the likelihood of a conventional attack by Russia or China.
Perhaps the name of the change in policy should be something like, "no first use, except in response to a conventional military attack, if absolutely needed. Especially, no first use to start a war."

读了文章后，我的感觉是日本之所以反对“不首先使用”核政策是因为这在理论上可能会增加日本遭中国或俄罗斯常规攻击的可能性。
或许这个政策转变的名字应该是“不首先使用，但是如有必要可对常规军事攻击作出回击。特别是不首先使用核武器发起战争”。

Uwe PaschenAUG. 16, 2016 - 06:52PM JST
Is Prime Minister Abe mad? It would be a good policy for all involved. Especially for Japan.

首相安倍疯了吗？对于所有各方来来说这都是好政策。特别是日本。

Ghost riderAUG. 16, 2016 - 07:15PM JST
Japan herewith officially declared the first use in Hiroshima was appropriate according Japan's view.

所以根据日本的看法，日本官方认为在广岛首先使用核武器是正确的做法。

kurisupisuAUG. 16, 2016 - 08:09PM JST
North Korea has already stated publicly that it has a no-first -use policy but here is Abe trying to overturn the cart with his maniacal militaristic pretensions!
Clearly, he desires conflict.....

朝鲜已经公开宣布自己实行不首先使用政策，但是安倍却想用自己疯狂的军国主义自负来推翻这种局面！
显然，他想要战争。。。。