韩国法院裁定在推特上关注朝鲜不是罪 [英国媒体]

Following NorthKorea on Twitter is not a crime, court rules

韩国法院裁定在推特上关注朝鲜不是罪



A South Koreancourt said on Thursday it had acquitted a man of sympathising with North Korea forfollowing its Twitter account, arguing that simply reading Pyongyang’s socialmedia posts did not violate Seoul’s security laws.

韩国一家法院周四称已经释放了一名男子，该男子在推特上关注和同情朝鲜。法院称阅读朝鲜的社交媒体帖子并不违反韩国的安全法。

Seoulprosecutors earlier charged the 73-year-old journalist with “distributing”materials that praised the communist North by following Pyongyang’s officialTwitter account, @uriminzok.

韩国检察官早先以关注朝鲜推特账号@uriminzok、散布赞美共产主义朝鲜的材料为由起诉这名73岁的记者。

Lee was,however, found guilty of supporting the North in his own blog postings and wassentenced to a one-year jail term, suspended for two years.

然而，李由于在自己的博客中支持北朝鲜被判一年刑期，缓刑两年。

South Korea’sNational Security Laws, enacted in 1948 to protect the fledgling state frominfiltration by the communist North, ban its citizens from praising orsympathising with Pyongyang.

为保护新建成的国家免遭朝鲜的渗透，颁布于1948年的韩国国家安全法禁止其公民赞美或同情朝鲜。


GordonBrownStain1m ago
King Jong Un isa god! come and arrest me you bastards

金正恩是神！你们这些混账来逮捕我吖。

HairyDan 14m ago
Quiz question:in which country has a man been put on trial for reading stuff on the internetand jailed for a year for expressing his opinions in a blog - the EvilCommunist Dictatorship of Korea or the Nice Free Democracy of Korea?

问：哪个国家的男子因为阅读帖子被起诉以及因为在博客中发表观点被判刑一年？是邪恶的共产主义朝鲜独裁政权还是美好自由的民主国家韩国？

kisunssi  HairyDan 5m ago
He got a trial?So obviously not the DPRK then...
It may haveescaped your notice, but the Korean war is still ongoing. During WWII weimprisoned fascists.
So, your pointis?

他只是接受了审判而已？那这显然不是发生在朝鲜。。。。
你可能忘记了朝鲜战争还没结束呢。二战期间，我们也关押法西斯分子。
所以你的看法是？

Kevinpond 19mago
I think we shouldcut South Korea some slack.
They are bang-upagainst, cheek by jowl, the most totalitarian state in the world. One run by aclown who makes the emperor Nero seem like a contemporary figure.
To make mattersworse, these military gangsters and hereditary loons are developing ( or atleast so they tell us ) a H-bomb - and have proven they have little concern forthe wellbeing of their own people ( millions starve while they spend on weapons) let alone that of anyone else's people.
We of allsocieties should know, when threatened by a totalitarian enemy - our owngovernments get ever so slightly authoritarian in response - sometimesnecessarily so.

我认为我们不应该批评韩国。
韩国在认真的对抗这个世界上最极权的国家。这个国家现在由一个小丑掌权，他让古罗马暴君尼禄看起来就像是个当代人物。
更糟糕的是，这些军事匪徒和世袭无赖正在发展氢弹（至少他们自己是这么说的），他们也表明他们对自己人民的福祉一点都不关心（人民在饥肠辘辘，可他们还把钱花在武器上），更别提其他国家人民的福祉了。
我们应该明白，当我们受到极权主义敌人威胁时，我们的政府也会以极权的手段作出回应——有时候这是必要的。

Hottentot 2m ago
Have southKorea, really got nothing better to do, than try and prosecute someone fromreading or following what another country is doing? or are they, becoming liketheir allies, paranoid?
As for nationalsecurity, the term has been so over-used, that it has become a joke! It's abouttime south Korea and the west tried, although it will be very difficult, togrow up.

韩国真的没有更好的事情可干了吗，竟然煞费苦心的去起诉某个关注其他国家的人？或者说韩国像其盟友一样变成了一个偏执狂了？
国家安全这个词真的被过渡滥用了，都成一个笑话了！韩国和西方是时候变成熟点了，尽管这会非常困难。

ThePeoplesPoet31m ago
North Koreafollows me.
Is that a crime?

朝鲜关注我。
这也是罪行吗？

MauditFrancais1979  ThePeoplesPoet 16m ago
Yes.

是罪行。

ogsy41 32m ago
It must be soliberating having the freedom to say what you like in South Korea compared tothose bastard commies over the border. Oh wait.....

比起朝鲜的王八共产主义分子，在韩国的人们肯定觉得非常自由，因为可以畅所欲言。哦，等等。。。。。

43bikeguy 40mago
Free speech inthe US seems like a panacea but the inequality is so great that that a richminority of voices are able to control the agenda. In the US the richer you arethe more 'Free' you are and that ain't fair or sustainable.

美国的言论自由看起来就像个万能药，但是美国的不平等太严重了，导致那些少数富人控制了话语权。在美国，你越是富有，你就越“自由“，这不公平，也是不可持续的。

Shelfunit 41mago
Should give theloonies who bang on about the UK being some sort of authoritarian regime a bitof perspective. It won't though.

有些疯子总是批评英国是某种形式的独裁政权，现在拿韩国来对比一下吧。但是这些疯子可能会执迷不悟。

thebigchil  Shelfunit 29m ago
At least the SKgovernment aren't repeatedly sidestepping parliamentary process andimplementing legislation that wasn't in their pre-election manifesto though...

至少韩国政府不会老是避开议会程序，也不会执行竞选宣言中所没有的法律。。。

perry_larsen 1hago
Falsecomparison, eh? Choosing not to issue a visa is rather different than tossing aresident in jail.

你的这个对比就不对了。不给颁发签证与将公民送进监狱二者之间可是有很大区别的吖。

perry_larsen 1hago
I really preferthe US model. Free speech, even if we don't like it.

我更倾向于美国的言论自由，尽管我们不喜欢。