中国炫耀新的武装直升机，北京称可以摧毁世界上最强大的坦克 [英国媒体]

-------------译者：mich-审核者：不爱睡觉的猪------------



Beijing has unveiled a homegrown combat chopper that's said to be capable of destroying the most powerful tank in the world.

北京公布了一个本土的武装直升飞机，据说有能力摧毁世界上最强大的坦克。

Two-seat Z-19E also known as 'Black Hurricane' is built to cater to the international market as Beijing aims to expand its presence in the global
market for military aircraft.
双座Z-19E也被称为“黑飓风”，旨在迎合国际市场，北京的目标是扩大在全球军用飞机的市场地位。

Chinese state media claimed that the single-rotor narrow-body aircraft is one of the most advanced helicopters of its kind worldwide. 

中国国家媒体称，这架单旋翼窄体飞机是全球最先进的直升机之一。




















-------------译者：mich-审核者：956245377------------

Roccob
Available at your local Walmart 

此机你的当地沃尔玛可购。

Joe Max
Big deal US has had helicopters that destroy any tank for 30 years. Also Chinese military has zero experience...big deal when talking about armies. Other than that just more MSM hype that's false

大事件啊！大事件！美国30年前就有可以摧毁任何坦克的直升飞机了。 而中国经验是零。 说到中国军队总是大事件啊大事件，比起这些，主流媒体炒作方式真的是不对的

Luke Lu
All the Brits better learn Chinese the old UK is now a failing nation 

所有的大不列颠人最好学学中文，老去的英国现正是失落国度。

Luke Lu
China will dominate it is not a "if" or a "maybe" 

中国会领导世界的，并不是“假设”或者“可能”

 -------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

simon25
It's made in China so no worries.

这是中国“质”造 所以别担心了。。

Kangaroo girl -> simon25
Another typical American never traveled to China

回复楼上
又是一个典型从未去过中国的人.

wisdomtrader
Don;t they have stuff we can steal too? That;s an Apache clone right there

难道他们就没有让我们山寨的东西吗？ 那是克隆阿帕奇。（美国的）（也有可能说的是法国的阿巴斯导弹）

Lizzie borden -> wisdomtrader
Looks like more of a Mangusta

回复楼上
看起来更像猫鼬直升飞机（意大利）

Pete
I wonder who they stole the secrets from?

我只是在想他们从谁那里盗取了机密？

John Smithbristol
Geez that looks awfully familiar. Where have I seen that before?

啧，看起来极其熟悉，忘了在哪里看过这辆直升飞机了。

Chillin
Apache nock off. 

复制了阿帕奇

OPTIMISTIC CYNIC
Just looking at the fit and finish of the metalwork is enough to know it's nothing but a junk prop. 

单看金属制品的拼接和抛光就足以了解它只不过是一个垃圾道具。

 -------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

bankofdad
If Chinese technology is so great how come most of it ends up in landfill?..............................cheers

如果中国技术那么牛掰为什么大部分都是扔进垃圾堆的结局？。。。。。。。。。。拍掌大笑

Singlakshmisingh

Looks cheap 
看起来很廉价

Habrok
China is making nuclear power plantshigh speed trainsjet fighters and building space stations.China has built the 500m aperture spherical telescopethe largest in the world.If Chinese technology is so bad then why are all these things working.People are either ignorant or jealous of Chinahence all the jokes about China.

中国正在建造核电站，高铁，喷气式战斗机和空间站。中国已经建成了世界上最大的500米孔径球形望远镜。如果中国的技术如此糟糕，那么为什么这些都做成了？你们是愚昧还是嫉妒中国，因此总想看中国的笑话。

Chillin -> Habrok
We laugh because China copied all that. This helicopter looks just like the American Apache helo. 

回复楼上，
我们笑只是因为中国山寨了所有一切东西，这个武战直升飞机看起来像美国的阿帕奇。

IIIPurrrsentKitty
"Marry 4 missiles" really DM? Wow. Bad editing aside that's a pretty kick a@@ chopper

“嫁接4枚导弹”真没关系吗？ 哇。 糟糕的编辑，这是一个很棒的一个直升飞机

-------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Hai Dozo
Stolen US technology of course. 

当然是窃取了美国的技术

Ilmari42 -> Hai Dozo
Which part is stolen from the US? Can you please elaborate. And just so you know the first functioning helicopter was invented by a Russian in 1939. So you could say stolen from Russia or even Leonardo Da Vinci.

回复楼上
哦，那一部分窃取了美国的？烦请你解说下？你知道第一架功能性直升飞机是苏联1939年发明的？然后你可以说美国是从苏联窃取的，或者从达芬奇那里窃取的。

Ilmari42 -> Hai Dozo
Notice the rotor blade. It was used by the Russians in the 30s

看看转叶片。 它在30年代被俄罗斯人用过

PusherMan
All my "made in china" products are horribly inferior than everything else. Should we assume the same here?

我所有的中国“质”造产品都比其他东西糟糕，我们该假设这个会有不一样吗？

LedZep
"Made in China" ... no quality issues there to be considered.

中国“质”造。。。质量问题毋庸置疑

Galaxar -> LedZep
Like every phone iPad computer electrical component motor battery - your entire technical existence is "Made in China".

回复楼上，
所有的iPhone，iPad，电脑，电器组件。电机。电池-你所有的科技产品都是中国制造的。

-------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

ChuChuPhan
A blatant threat to Russia. I wonder how they will react.

对俄罗斯的公然挑衅。 我不知道他们会如何反应。

Trainwreck
an old stinger will blast that right out of the air . chopper warfare is an art

一架老式毒刺（导弹武器）就能在空中轰掉它。 直升机战只能当一门艺术看啦

Trainwreck
where are the tanks its going to blast? unless their going to forward deploy its useless

他要轰炸哪里的坦克？ 除非他们提前部署否则它根本没用， 


Mavrick
More stolen designs! That tail section was the same as the copter that crashed when Ben Laden was taken out

又一个被盗设计，那个尾部与当本拉登被带走时撞倒的直升机是一样的

bigbarf -> Mavrick
回复楼上
NO. Fenstron tail from a Gazelle

不这是"小羚羊"的fenstron尾桨(美法联合研制)

Galaxar -> Mavrick
Looks like a Eurocopter 'parts-bin-special' Half Tiger Half Gazelle.

回复Mavrick
看起来像欧洲直升飞机的拼装版，一半虎式一般是羚羊式 （意思是中国分别采购了现有的欧洲零件，进行了组装，借此让成本更加便宜。）

 -------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

Galaxar
So it's a cloned Eurocopter Tiger from the early 90s?

所以他是克隆了90年代早期的欧洲虎式？（法德）

pirateslife99
Tanks are sitting ducks for any attack helicopter. They have very few ways of defending themselves against one. But most tanks don't operate without an airforce flying overhead.

在攻击直升机面前坦克只能坐以待毙。坦克几乎没有什么办法对付直升机。但是，大部分坦克在没有空中火力掩护的情况下是不会出来溜达的。  

Skittles88
It's pretty but made in China.

他很漂亮但是是 中国“质”造

Lanesteele240
The copter is not the question. It is the weapons on the copter that matters. Did they copy those correctly 

直升机不是问题，重要的是直升机上的武器。 他们山寨对了吗？

-------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

JT123
I wouldnt discount this helicopter as being "junk" because its made in China. That expression might have worked 20 years ago these days they are highly advanced in certain areas and their military has a lot of funding. The US military has plenty of its own tech issues....the F35 program for one example. 

我不会因为它是在中国制造的就把这架直升机当成“垃圾”。 可能在20年前还可以这么说了，现在中国在某些领域是高度先进的，他们的军队有很多资金。 美军有很多自己的技术问题.... F35项目就是一个例子。

Solomon Kane -> JT123
Actually now that the pilots have learned the operational limits of the F35 they're not saying such bad things about them anymore.

实际上现在，飞行员已经了解了F35的运行极限，他们不再宣传这种坏消息了。

-------------译者：mich-审核者：龙腾翻译总管------------

2 A. Deplorable -> JT123
Funny thing about F-35's tech issues... Not about tech but rather social engineering and politics. Most recent cost and delay was the ejection seats. When woman pilots there body weight being less than men's the ejection force was too great causing death and injury. So they had to redesign the seat with different motors and sextor switches to toggle between male or female pilots. Now watch someone will forget to flip the switch and someone will still get hurt!

回复JT123
关于F-35的技术问题还蛮有趣的...与其说是技术难关，更像社会工程和政治范畴。 最近成本争议和推迟发布原因是关于弹出席位。 女性飞行员重量往往小于男性，弹射力太大会导致她们死亡或受伤。 所以不得不重新设计座椅，采用不同的电机和性别开关以切换男性模式或女性模式。 看看现在有人如果忘记翻转开关，就会被伤到！

Lancelot Jones
looks like a blackhawk. they can't come up with anything original

兰斯洛特琼斯
看起来像黑鹰直升飞机（美国）。 他们拿不出任何原创的东西